Po-Hung Wu1, Mariajose Bedoya2, Jim White3, Christopher L Brace3,4. 1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. 2. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Rm 1005, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intra-procedural monitoring and post-procedural follow-up is necessary for a successful ablation treatment. An imaging technique which can assess the ablation geometry accurately is beneficial to monitor and evaluate treatment. In this study, we developed an automated ablation segmentation technique for serial low-dose, noisy ablation computed tomography (CT) or contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). METHODS: Low-dose, noisy temporal CT and CECT volumes were acquired during microwave ablation on normal porcine liver (four with non-contrast CT and eight with CECT). Highly constrained backprojection (HYPR) processing was used to recover ablation zone information compromised by low-dose noise. First-order statistic features and normalized fractional Brownian features (NBF) were used to segment ablation zones by fuzzy c-mean clustering. After clustering, the segmented ablation zone was refined by cyclic morphological processing. Automatic and manual segmentations were compared to gross pathology with Dice's coefficient (morphological similarity), while cross-sectional dimensions were compared by percent difference. RESULTS: Automatic and manual segmentations of the ablation zone were very similar to gross pathology (Dice Coefficients: Auto.-Path. = 0.84 ± 0.02; Manu.-Path. = 0.76 ± 0.03, P = 0.11). The differences in ablation area, major diameter and minor diameter were 17.9 ± 3.2%, 11.1 ± 3.2% and 16.2 ± 3.4%, respectively, when comparing automatic segmentation to gross pathology, which were lower than the differences of 32.9 ± 16.8%, 13.0 ± 9.8% and 21.8 ± 5.8% when comparing manual segmentation to gross pathology. Manual segmentations tended to overestimate gross pathology when ablation area was less than 15 cm2 , but the automated segmentation tended to underestimate gross pathology when ablation zone is larger than 20 cm2 . CONCLUSION: Fuzzy c-means clustering may be used to aid automatic segmentation of ablation zones without prior information or user input, making serial CT/CECT has more potential to assess treatments intra-procedurally.
PURPOSE: Intra-procedural monitoring and post-procedural follow-up is necessary for a successful ablation treatment. An imaging technique which can assess the ablation geometry accurately is beneficial to monitor and evaluate treatment. In this study, we developed an automated ablation segmentation technique for serial low-dose, noisy ablation computed tomography (CT) or contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). METHODS: Low-dose, noisy temporal CT and CECT volumes were acquired during microwave ablation on normal porcine liver (four with non-contrast CT and eight with CECT). Highly constrained backprojection (HYPR) processing was used to recover ablation zone information compromised by low-dose noise. First-order statistic features and normalized fractional Brownian features (NBF) were used to segment ablation zones by fuzzy c-mean clustering. After clustering, the segmented ablation zone was refined by cyclic morphological processing. Automatic and manual segmentations were compared to gross pathology with Dice's coefficient (morphological similarity), while cross-sectional dimensions were compared by percent difference. RESULTS: Automatic and manual segmentations of the ablation zone were very similar to gross pathology (Dice Coefficients: Auto.-Path. = 0.84 ± 0.02; Manu.-Path. = 0.76 ± 0.03, P = 0.11). The differences in ablation area, major diameter and minor diameter were 17.9 ± 3.2%, 11.1 ± 3.2% and 16.2 ± 3.4%, respectively, when comparing automatic segmentation to gross pathology, which were lower than the differences of 32.9 ± 16.8%, 13.0 ± 9.8% and 21.8 ± 5.8% when comparing manual segmentation to gross pathology. Manual segmentations tended to overestimate gross pathology when ablation area was less than 15 cm2 , but the automated segmentation tended to underestimate gross pathology when ablation zone is larger than 20 cm2 . CONCLUSION: Fuzzy c-means clustering may be used to aid automatic segmentation of ablation zones without prior information or user input, making serial CT/CECT has more potential to assess treatments intra-procedurally.
Authors: Koenraad J Mortelé; Maria-Raquel Oliva; Silvia Ondategui; Pablo R Ros; Stuart G Silverman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Kevin M Johnson; Julia Velikina; Yijing Wu; Steve Kecskemeti; Oliver Wieben; Charles A Mistretta Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: E Schena; P Saccomandi; F Giurazza; M A Caponero; L Mortato; F M Di Matteo; F Panzera; R Del Vescovo; B Beomonte Zobel; S Silvestri Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: G D Dodd; M C Soulen; R A Kane; T Livraghi; W R Lees; Y Yamashita; A R Gillams; O I Karahan; H Rhim Journal: Radiographics Date: 2000 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Richard S Montgomery; Andres Rahal; Gerald D Dodd; John R Leyendecker; Linda G Hubbard Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.959