Literature DB >> 3323719

[The devil's advocate--commentary on sutures].

H Troidl1, S Büechl, J Kusche, P Gauda.   

Abstract

The decision between hand suture or stapler was tested for the large bowel in randomized trials whereas retrospectively only in the upper gastrointestinal and respiratory tract. No clear difference was seen concerning patient's security and cost-time consumption. The stapler is more comfortable but the handsuture technique is still recommended. By the stapler anatomically very difficult anastomoses can be performed. Whether this is an advantage for the patient has to be tested because the technical progress may decrease physical function (incontinence!) and quality of life. In summary, the stapler, if applied critically, seems to be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3323719     DOI: 10.1007/BF01297800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  27 in total

1.  [Anorectal continence following manual and mechanical anastomosis suture. Results of a controlled study of rectal surgery].

Authors:  L Jostarndt; A Thiede; G Lau; H Hamelmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Pouch and Roux-Y reconstruction following gastrectomy. A time-saving stomach replacement technic with the systematic use of staplers].

Authors:  A Thiede; K H Fuchs; H Hamelmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R W Beart; K A Kelly
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog.

Authors:  A L Polglase; E S Hughes; F T McDermott; E Pihl; F R Burke
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-06

5.  Diamine oxidase (DAO) activity and intestinal mucosa integrity: influence of suture techniques.

Authors:  R Mennigen; J Kusche; L Leisten; K Erpenbach
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1987-04

6.  Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.

Authors:  N S Williams; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Current trends in the use of sphincter-saving excision in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  J C Goligher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  [Esophagojejunostomy--how safe is manual suture today?].

Authors:  R Bittner; M Butters; R Roscher; H G Beger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Carcinogenesis at colonic anastomotic sites. An animal study.

Authors:  C A Rubio; G Nylander; B Wallin; M Sveander; M L Alun; A Duvander
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Bronchopleural fistula following pneumonectomy for carcinoma of the bronchus: mechanical stapling versus hand suturing.

Authors:  C P Forrester-Wood
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.