Giuseppe Gasparre1,2,3,4, Claudio Ceccarelli5,6, Giulia Girolimetti7,8,5,9, Lorena Marchio7,8,5,9, Antonio De Leo5,6, Miriam Mangiarelli7,9, Laura Benedetta Amato7,8,5,9, Simone Zanotti10, Mario Taffurelli7,10, Donatella Santini5,11. 1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. giuseppe.gasparre3@unibo.it. 2. Center for Applied Biomedical Research (CRBA), University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. giuseppe.gasparre3@unibo.it. 3. Centro di Studio e Ricerca sulle Neoplasie Ginecologiche, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. giuseppe.gasparre3@unibo.it. 4. Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via G. Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, BO, Italy. giuseppe.gasparre3@unibo.it. 5. Centro di Studio e Ricerca sulle Neoplasie Ginecologiche, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 6. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 7. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 8. Center for Applied Biomedical Research (CRBA), University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 9. Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via G. Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, BO, Italy. 10. Breast Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Urological Diseases, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 11. Operative Unit of Pathology, Sant'Orsola Hospital, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In daily practice, a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is usually considered as a new independent tumor despite the indications of several studies showing that the second neoplasia may be a metastatic spread of the primary tumor. Recognition of clonal masses in the context of multiple synchronous or metachronous tumors is crucial for correct prognosis, therapeutic choice, and patient management. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing shows high informative potential in the diagnosis of synchronous neoplasms, based on the fact that somatic mtDNA mutations are non-recurrent events, whereas tumors sharing them have a common origin. We here applied this technique to reveal clonality of the CBC with respect to the first tumor. METHODS: We analyzed 30 sample pairs of primary breast cancers and synchronous or metachronous CBCs with detailed clinical information available and compared standard clinico-pathological criteria with mtDNA sequencing to reveal the metastatic nature of CBCs. RESULTS: MtDNA analysis was informative in 23% of the cases, for which it confirmed a clonal origin of the second tumor. In addition, it allowed to solve two ambiguous cases where histopathological criteria had failed to be conclusive and to suggest a clonal origin for two additional cases that had been classified as independent by pathologists. CONCLUSION: Overall, the mtDNA-based classification showed a more accurate predictive power than standard histopathology in identifying cases of metastatic rather than bilateral breast cancers in our cohort, suggesting that mtDNA sequencing may be a more precise and easy-to-use method to be introduced in daily routine to support and improve histopathological diagnoses.
PURPOSE: In daily practice, a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is usually considered as a new independent tumor despite the indications of several studies showing that the second neoplasia may be a metastatic spread of the primary tumor. Recognition of clonal masses in the context of multiple synchronous or metachronous tumors is crucial for correct prognosis, therapeutic choice, and patient management. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing shows high informative potential in the diagnosis of synchronous neoplasms, based on the fact that somatic mtDNA mutations are non-recurrent events, whereas tumors sharing them have a common origin. We here applied this technique to reveal clonality of the CBC with respect to the first tumor. METHODS: We analyzed 30 sample pairs of primary breast cancers and synchronous or metachronous CBCs with detailed clinical information available and compared standard clinico-pathological criteria with mtDNA sequencing to reveal the metastatic nature of CBCs. RESULTS: MtDNA analysis was informative in 23% of the cases, for which it confirmed a clonal origin of the second tumor. In addition, it allowed to solve two ambiguous cases where histopathological criteria had failed to be conclusive and to suggest a clonal origin for two additional cases that had been classified as independent by pathologists. CONCLUSION: Overall, the mtDNA-based classification showed a more accurate predictive power than standard histopathology in identifying cases of metastatic rather than bilateral breast cancers in our cohort, suggesting that mtDNA sequencing may be a more precise and easy-to-use method to be introduced in daily routine to support and improve histopathological diagnoses.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer metastasis; Contralateral breast cancers; Mitochondrial DNA mutations
Authors: Colin B Begg; Irina Ostrovnaya; Felipe C Geyer; Anastasios D Papanastasiou; Charlotte K Y Ng; Rita A Sakr; Jonine L Bernstein; Kathleen A Burke; Tari A King; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Audrey Mauguen; Irene Orlow; Britta Weigelt; Venkatraman E Seshan; Monica Morrow; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: B Banelli; I Casciano; A Di Vinci; B Gatteschi; A Levaggi; F Carli; C Bighin; S Salvi; G Allemanni; P Ghiorzo; P Pronzato; M Venturini; M Romani; L Del Mastro Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Li Ding; Timothy J Ley; David E Larson; Christopher A Miller; Daniel C Koboldt; John S Welch; Julie K Ritchey; Margaret A Young; Tamara Lamprecht; Michael D McLellan; Joshua F McMichael; John W Wallis; Charles Lu; Dong Shen; Christopher C Harris; David J Dooling; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Ken Chen; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki-Veizer; Vincent J Magrini; Lisa Cook; Sean D McGrath; Tammi L Vickery; Michael C Wendl; Sharon Heath; Mark A Watson; Daniel C Link; Michael H Tomasson; William D Shannon; Jacqueline E Payton; Shashikant Kulkarni; Peter Westervelt; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; John F DiPersio Journal: Nature Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jana Biermann; Toshima Z Parris; Szilárd Nemes; Anna Danielsson; Hanna Engqvist; Elisabeth Werner Rönnerman; Eva Forssell-Aronsson; Anikó Kovács; Per Karlsson; Khalil Helou Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Sara Alkner; Man-Hung Eric Tang; Christian Brueffer; Malin Dahlgren; Yilun Chen; Eleonor Olsson; Christof Winter; Sara Baker; Anna Ehinger; Lisa Rydén; Lao H Saal; Mårten Fernö; Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Lei Bao; Karen Messer; Richard Schwab; Olivier Harismendy; Minya Pu; Brian Crain; Shawn Yost; Kelly A Frazer; Brinda Rana; Farnaz Hasteh; Anne Wallace; Barbara A Parker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240