BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients have a cumulative lifetime risk of 2%-15% of developing a contralateral metastatic or ex novo primary cancer. From prognostic and therapeutic viewpoints, it is important to differentiate metastatic from second primary. To distinguish these entities, we investigated whether the pattern of X chromosome inactivation could determine whether the two tumors derived from different progenitor cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clonality of bilateral breast cancer was evaluated through the X-inactivation analysis using the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) polymorphism and the histopathologic and molecular results were compared. A different or an identical pattern of X inactivation was considered as indicator of a second primary cancer or not informative, respectively. We considered morphological indicators of a new primary cancer the absence of concordance in the histological type or a better histological differentiation. RESULTS: Ten patients with bilateral breast cancer were evaluated. Morphological criteria indicated that eight were second primary, a conclusion confirmed by the X-inactivation analysis. Two cases classified as recurrence according to morphological criteria were classified as second tumor by molecular analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the HUMARA clonality assay can improve the histological parameters in differentiating metastatic cancer from second primary cancer.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancerpatients have a cumulative lifetime risk of 2%-15% of developing a contralateral metastatic or ex novo primary cancer. From prognostic and therapeutic viewpoints, it is important to differentiate metastatic from second primary. To distinguish these entities, we investigated whether the pattern of X chromosome inactivation could determine whether the two tumors derived from different progenitor cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clonality of bilateral breast cancer was evaluated through the X-inactivation analysis using the humanandrogen receptor gene (HUMARA) polymorphism and the histopathologic and molecular results were compared. A different or an identical pattern of X inactivation was considered as indicator of a second primary cancer or not informative, respectively. We considered morphological indicators of a new primary cancer the absence of concordance in the histological type or a better histological differentiation. RESULTS: Ten patients with bilateral breast cancer were evaluated. Morphological criteria indicated that eight were second primary, a conclusion confirmed by the X-inactivation analysis. Two cases classified as recurrence according to morphological criteria were classified as second tumor by molecular analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the HUMARA clonality assay can improve the histological parameters in differentiating metastatic cancer from second primary cancer.
Authors: Benjamin A Weinberg; Kyle Gowen; Thomas K Lee; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Robert Bristow; Lauren Krill; M Isabel Almira-Suarez; Siraj M Ali; Vincent A Miller; Stephen V Liu; Samuel J Klempner Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-02-13
Authors: Colin B Begg; Irina Ostrovnaya; Felipe C Geyer; Anastasios D Papanastasiou; Charlotte K Y Ng; Rita A Sakr; Jonine L Bernstein; Kathleen A Burke; Tari A King; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Audrey Mauguen; Irene Orlow; Britta Weigelt; Venkatraman E Seshan; Monica Morrow; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ida Casciano; Angela Di Vinci; Barbara Banelli; Claudio Brigati; Alessandra Forlani; Giorgio Allemanni; Massimo Romani Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: D Brock Hewitt; Yaming Li; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; James L Fisher; Daniel Stover; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: Sara Alkner; Man-Hung Eric Tang; Christian Brueffer; Malin Dahlgren; Yilun Chen; Eleonor Olsson; Christof Winter; Sara Baker; Anna Ehinger; Lisa Rydén; Lao H Saal; Mårten Fernö; Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 6.466