Literature DB >> 33235690

Immunopathology, host-virus genome interactions, and effective vaccine development in SARS-CoV-2.

Desh Deepak Singh1, Ihn Han2, Eun-Ha Choi2, Dharmendra Kumar Yadav3.   

Abstract

Coronaviruses are a group of enveloped RNA viruses that are diversely found in humans and now declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. The population's susceptibility to these highly pathogenic coronaviruses has contributed to large outbreaks, evolved into public health events, and rapidly transmitted globally. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapies and vaccines against this disease. In the primary stage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) infection, the signs and symptoms are nonspecific, and many more cases have been observed than initially expected. Genome sequencing is performed regularly to identify genetic changes to SARS-COV-2, and vaccine development is focused on manufacture, production, and based on specific problems, and very few are available on recent developments in the prevention of outbreaks. The aim of this review article to explore recent updates on SARS-COV-2 in the context of pathogenesis during disease progression, and innate acquired mechanisms of defense, This includes advances in diagnostics, susceptibility, and severity of host-virus genome interactions, modes of transmission, active compounds being used in pre-clinical and clinical trials for the treatment of patients, vaccine developments, and the effectiveness of SARS-COV-2 prevention and control measures. We have summarized the importance of pathophysiology immune response, Diagnostics, vaccine development currently approaches explored for SARS-COV-2.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostics; Immune response; Pathophysiology; SARS-COV-2; Vaccine development.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33235690      PMCID: PMC7677077          DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J        ISSN: 2001-0370            Impact factor:   7.271


Introduction

The highly contagious and pathogenic novel SARS-CoV-2, causative agent ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, has spread rapidly and posed a health threat of unprecedented magnitude on the global population. This group includes more than 100 viruses commonly found in various animal species, including bats, pangolins, horses, cats, cattle, camels, goats, and humans [1], [2], [3]. Coronaviruses are classified in order Nidovirales, family Coronaviridae, and positive-sense, single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) viruses with a large genome size of approximately 30 kb. There are seven types of coronavirus found in humans, belonging to “alpha and beta” groups, which frequently mutate and show cross-species transmission. Like the other two highly pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 also caused severe respiratory illness and even death. The first human coronavirus (alpha-HCoV-229E) was identified in the 1960 s and caused an upper respiratory tract infection, like the common cold [4], [5]. Most people are infected with one or more types of viruses. Rarely, coronaviruses infect animals and become new zoonoses, which can infect people and spread in the human population [5]. A new alpha human coronavirus was discovered in 2003, which was associated with pneumonia, rhinorrhea, and laryngotracheobronchitis in children, particularly in immune-compromised individuals. The beta coronaviruses (type 2) are categorized into lineages A, B, C, and D. One member of lineage A (HCoV-OC-43) was discovered in 1967, and a second (HCoV-HKU) was identified in 2005, associated with diarrhea, acute rhinitis, and infection of the lower respiratory tract. From lineage B, SARS-CoV was identified in 2002–03 and its mode of transmission was bat to civet and then, via civet, to humans [2], [3], [4], [5]. A second highly transmissible virus from lineage B was discovered in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and now known as SARS-CoV-2. Another coronavirus of interest belongs to lineage C and caused an outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in 2012, from camels to humans [6]. In 2019 in Wuhan, China there were several unusual cases of pneumonia, presenting with a dry cough, dyspnea, fever, and lung tissue damage [3]. The source of many of these cases was recorded as being the Wuhan wild animal and seafood market [7]. On 12th January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the infectious agent. China reported virus originated from wild bats and was similar to SARS, hence the infectious agent became known as SARS-CoV-2 at the end of January [8] and declared an emergency a pandemic (global outbreak) of disease [1], [9]. SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible and 15,296,926 cases and 628,903 deaths from SARS-CoV-2 were recorded in over 200 counties on 24th July 2020. We compared these figures with other coronavirus outbreaks, such as SARS in 2003, where the number of infected persons was approximately 8000, with a 9.5% case fatality rate. MERS in 2012 had approximately 2,500 cases, with a mortality rate of approximately 35% [10], [11]. The virus targets the respiratory system and its transmission is by contact, droplets, and fomites from another infected person who may be symptomatic or asymptomatic [12]. The incubation period is around 2 to 14 days [9]. The main symptoms are dry cough, fever, sore throat, and shortness of breath, leading to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress (ARDS), which may require intensive care as shown in Fig. 1 [13]. Overall, the mortality rate is approximately 3%, and increases with age, over 60. The mortality rate is also higher in people with diabetes, heart disease, and kidney disease [14]. In COVID-19 patients, a characteristic feature is a lymphocytopenia and CT chest scans show ground glass-like features, indicative of viral pneumonia [15], [16]. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is made with real-time PCR, by identifying the RNA load via nasal swab (NS) and throat swab (TS), and/or by X-ray and CT scans [15]. The main treatments are supportive, such as antivirals, antimalarials, steroids, and antibiotics [17]. At present, no approved treatments or vaccines are available against SARS-CoV-2 as shown in Fig. 1. However, randomized multicentric clinical trials are under way to look for treatment and vaccine options.
Fig. 1

Flow Diagram of transmission, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and treatment for COVOD-19.

Flow Diagram of transmission, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and treatment for COVOD-19.

Pathogenesis during the progression of SARS-COV-2 infection

MERS and SARS share the same mechanism as SARS-CoV-2. Spike protein (S2) binds to the Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM-1) receptor protein, which is expressed in epithelial cells [18]. The virus enters the host cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis and is uncoated, releasing RNA genome into the cytoplasm see human SARS-COV-2 life cycle as shown in Fig. 2 [15]. Spike protein also has another function; binds to ACE2, causing down-regulation, which leads, eventually, to lung injury [19]. The liver produces an inactive form of angiotensin, which circulates in the blood in response to the enzyme renin released by the kidney, and which converts angiotensin to angiotensin-I [13], [14]. This circulates in blood in an inactive form and converted to angiotensin-II by an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE or ACE1) [20]. This enzyme maintains blood pressure and mediates tissue injury via a series of non-hemodynamic effects [21]. ACE2 would normally cleave angiotensin-II, as part of a negative feedback loop. tTherefore, if ACE2 is downregulated, this would increase blood pressure in SARS-COV-2 patients. Furthermore, angiotensin-II can bind to receptors in the lungs, called type 1a angiotensin-II receptors (AGTR1A), which increases the permeability of the lungs. Here, a problem arises when the downregulation of ACE2 simultaneously upregulates ACE1, due to negative feedback [22], [23], [24], and this leads to excessive angiotensin-II. This binds to the AGTR1A receptors, which then causes excessive vascular pulmonary activity, the pathology observed in lung tissue associated with pulmonary destruction [22], [23], [24].
Fig. 2

Life Cycle of Highly Pathogenic Human Coronaviruses. the figure was created using BioRender ().

Life Cycle of Highly Pathogenic Human Coronaviruses. the figure was created using BioRender ().

Innate and acquired mechanisms of defense against SARS-CoV-2

The entry of immune cells into the lungs to fight SARS-CoV-2 leads to ARDS [25], [26] and it's associated with the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines shown in Fig. 3 [27]. In SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, IL-1β, IL-16, CXC chemokines, and ligand 2 (CCL2) levels are high [28]. Individuals recovred from SARS-CoV-2 have shown an early expression of interferons IFN-α, IFN-γ, CXCL-10, and CCL2 [29]. IFN-α is an antiviral protein released by infected cells and serves as a signal to produce other anti-viral proteins, so that nearby host cells are more protected. It activates other immune cells, such as macrophages [29]. IFN-γ is a part of the immune system that destroys particular cells that are infected with SARS-CoV-2 [30]. Chemo attractants such as CXCL-10 and CCL2 are released to guide other cells to destroy infected cells [31], [32]. The adaptive immune response is known to be vital to survival, severe SARS-CoV-2 infection is related to a failure to switch from an innate immune response to an adaptive immune response. Infected people lose their memory cells, effector cells, or enough antibodies to reduce the viral load, unbalancing the host-pathogen interaction [33]. NF-kB an important pro-inflammatory cytokine that regulates some genes encoding other cytokines and chemokines as shown in Fig. 3 [34] that are released by cells and which trigger an immune response against the infection. Nucleocapsid proteins (N-proteins) of SARS-CoV-2 bind to viral RNA, as part of the assembly process, and this may be prevented by host proteins such as MDAS and RIG-1 [35]. These proteins detect viral RNA and trigger cell destruction [36] The EB protein of SARS-CoV-2 inhibited by MAD-5 and RIG-1. If MAD-5 and RIG-1 proteins can function, they activate the mitochondrial surface protein MAVS, and this protein activates E3 ubiquitin ligases, leading to the production of NF-kB, which enters the nucleus and activates pro-inflammatory cytokines [37]. The E3 ubiquitin ligases also activate IRF-3 and IRF-7 transcription factors, which enter the nucleus and upregulate interferon α, γ, and activate immune cells (Fig. 3) [3], [38]. However, the M−protein of SARS-CoV-2 inhibits the phosphorylation of IRF-3 and IRF-7 [36]. Therefore, these transcription factors cannot go to the nucleus and cannot up-regulate the interferon at transcription level [3]. The PLPro protein of SARS-CoV-2 is capable of inhibiting the activation of NF-kB, therefore no response in the nucleus and upregulation of pro-inflammatory proteins. In some cases, the production of sufficient cytokines decreases the number of interferons [35], [39], [40], [41].
Fig. 3

Immune response the SARS-Co-V2 infection.

Immune response the SARS-Co-V2 infection.

Advances in the diagnosis of SARS-COV-2

The gold standard for diagnosis is RT-PCR, and the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an RT-PCR kit based on a specific target sequence as shown in Fig. 1 [42], [43]. Various countries have developed their RT-PCR kits, such as Germany (targeting RdRP, E, and N genes), China (targeting ORF1ab and N), Hong Kong (targeting nsp14 and N genes), Japan (targeting multiple proteins), and Thailand (targeting the N gene). Various diagnostic assays are being developed to detect the virus. Some kits are only able to detect one strain of SARS-CoV-2, and some are sensitive to any SARS agent. The specificity of RT-PCR depends on the expertise of individuals, and samples must be taken from the lower or upper respiratory tract. Moreover, single negative samples do not rule out MERS-CoV infection [15], [17] RT-PCR can often miss the identification together and has some time less sensitivity senstive for acute infection [42]. Tested sample, approximately 3% of those who have negative PCR results have SARS-CoV-2. There could be reasons, for this, perhaps early at the pandemic not enough virus samples for detection and the diagnostic kits were not used correctly [44]. The RT-PCR test may improve over time and suggested, meanwhile, that chest CT is used to identify patients for further testing, which will help to inform isolation and treatment as shown in Fig. 1 [45], [46]. CT scan is also good technology to screening for testing but due to poor access to laboratory testing, or in a situation where centralized public health workers are overstretched [47]. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 symptoms, such as fever, cough, and shortness of breath, clinicians often carry out chest X-rays, which are relatively cheap and easy. The most common abnormal finding that of ground-glass opacities, portions of the lungs show up on X-ray images as a hazy shade of gray, like frosted glass, instead of being black [48], [49]. It is important to know that chest X-rays are not very sensitive to SARS-CoV-2. Patients who are highly suspected of having SARS-COV-2 viral pneumonia should probably receive chest CT, even if their chest X-ray is negative [27], [50]. Chest CT provides a more detailed view, with the most common finding, again, being ground-glass opacities scattered throughout the lungs [51], [52]. These represent tiny air sacs or alveoli that are filled with fluid and that turn a shade of grey on the CT scan. In severe and advanced infections, more fluid accumulates in the lobes of the lungs, and the appearance progresses to a solid, white consolidation and finally a crazy-paving pattern, with swelling of the interstitial space along the walls of the lung lobules [53], [54]. A chest X-ray is informative but not very sensitive or specific to SARS-CoV-2; therefore, individuals should undergo RT-PCR [54], [55]. Many countries have been isolating patients with classic CT findings until laboratory tests help to identify the cause of disease. It is also important to evaluate each patient, based on the severity of the disease [55]. Individuals can be asymptomatic or have a very mild form of the disease; the sensitivity of a chest CT falls to about 50% in the first 48 h of symptoms or with individuals with the mild disease [51]. ELISA was used to detect antibodies to MERS-CoV for earlier detection, which is based on the N and S proteins of MERS-Co-V. Micro-neutralization is used to detect specific antibodies in the serum sample, this test is considered more sensitive and specific for the analysis of neutralizing antibodies. The presence of antibodies indicates that the immune response has developed in the infected person, but serology tests are recommended for observation purposes only, not for a diagnosis.

Case classification and clinical complications with SARS-CoV-2 infection

The new CDC and WHO list of possible SARS-CoV-2 symptoms includes fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, repeated shaking with chills, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, and loss of taste and smell as shown in Fig. 1. In a few cases, patients experience extreme fatigue, diarrhea, and fever 37.8 °C or above [3], [9], [10], [11], [13], [56]. Symptoms usually occur 2–14 days after exposure to the virus, but may also be observed for up to 28 days. Not all individuals with SARS-CoV-2 show all symptoms and these range from mild to severe [56]. The test result showed viral nucleic acid declared as a positive SARS-CoV-2 test [14], [15], [16]. Suspected cases are those with symptoms who have been exposed to infected cases [13]. Clinically diagnosed cases are those having symptoms, prior exposure, and the presence of a lung imaging feature consisting of coronavirus pneumonia [34], [46]. Asymptomatic cases are free from symptoms but test positive for viral nucleic acid. SARS-CoV-2 infection is classified into three categories mild, severe, and critical. Mild cases have either no sign of pneumonia or mild pneumonia [27]. Severe cases show problems of oxygenation, breathing, and characteristic radiological findings on a CT-Scan [57], [58]. In severe cases, breathing problems are classified as dyspnea, and patients have a respiratory frequency (RF) > 30/Min [12], [14], [55], [58]. Severity also classified as an oxygen saturation < 93% and PF ratio < 300 [55]. The illness is considered to be severe if lung infiltration or pneumonia occupying more than 50% of their lung field and is seen on a chest radiograph or CT-scan [55], [59]. In critical cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major clinical complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection [60]. This syndrome is characterized by hypoxic respiratory failure and bilateral infiltration due to diffuse alveolar damage [61]. This damage can cause respiratory failure, which is associated with V/Q mismatch and pulmonary shunting [62], [63]. Large immune-mediated cytokine cascades cause lung alveolar damage, patients are unable to successfully ventilate, and develop respiratory failure [64]. Septic shock causes vasodilation and leads to multiple organ dysfunction, especially in the kidney. Some SARS-CoV-2 patients develop renal failure, in addition to respiratory failure, and may require life support [65]. Patients who develop these complications with SARS-COV-2 have much higher mortality rates [66]. The overall case fatality rate in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic near about 3.5%, but in elderly patients, this rises to 14%. Fatality is higher for patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes , chronic respiratory disease , and cancer [67], [68]. Some clinicians have reported the presence of blood clots in young adults (aged < 50 years), which causes serious problems such as heart attack and stroke [69].

Susceptibility to mutation and severity of host-virus genome interactions

SARS-CoV-2 has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variants. Of these, 19 are novel strains, including six mutations in the spike protein. Different strains have affected different parts of the world. This may lead to potential difficulties in finding a universal method of diagnosis or treatment. Strains from 11 randomly chosen SARS-CoV-2 patients from Hangzhou were isolated and analyzed by deep sequencing [70], [71], [72]. Researchers said that the virus has acquired mutations that are capable of substantially changing its pathogenicity. Some of the most pathogenic strains of the virus are more pathogenic than normal strains [73], [74]. One mutated strain of SARS-CoV-2 has been more lethal across Europe and New York than in other parts of the United States and other countries [75]. The diversity of viral strains under investigation leads to a consideration of the impact of these mutations on the development of vaccines and drugs. Mutations in the virus genome might cause the disease to be more virulent, more severe, or more transmissible [18], [76]. Microbiologists from the Peking School of Life Sciences in Beijing, and the Institute Pasteur of Shanghai, have studied the genome of 103 samples of SARC-CoV-2 [18]. They analyzed the evolutionary relationship between the virus strains and their sequenced genomes. They identified two lineages the milder or less infectious S type and the highly infectious, more virulent, and more severe L type [77]. The genetic difference between S and L lineages is in the receptor-binding domain. The L type is more prevalent (70%) in current cases [78], [79]. The L type was prevalent in the early stages of the outbreak in Wuhan. Later on, the S type became prevalent in China because of lockdown control [80]. The Chinese lockdown successfully closed down the spread by isolating people, and this approach seemed to reduce the number of cases of L type SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan after January 2020 [79], [80]. If the Chinese lockdown halted the L type, the subsequent pandemic may be of the S type, which is believed to be less virulent [79], [80], [81]. There are also the possibility of infection with both viral types in an individual with SARS-CoV-2. One patient in the US has tested positive for both the S and L types, so it appears that both lineages are persisting in the pandemic [81], [82].

Drugs used in pre-clinical and clinical therapy

There is no specific treatment currently available drugs for SARS-CoV-2 [70], [71], [77]. Some drugs are under investigation and being tested as a potential treatment of SARS-COV-2, as shown in Table 1, Table 2. The antiviral agent famvir has shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, and clinical trials have been conducted in 70 patients in Shenzhen, Guangdong province [72], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87]. Another drug option is remdesevir, an adenosine analog, which is incorporated into the nascent viral RNA chain and results in premature termination. However, the drug is still in a clinical trial [88], a randomized control trial involving 1063 patients, funded by the US, improved recovery from advanced SARS-CoV-2. Preliminary results indicate that patients treated with remdesevir showed a 31% improvement in recovery time over placebo [88]. Chloroquine widely used as an anti-malarial and as a treatment for autoimmune disease, and also reported as having anti-viral activity, blocking virus infection by increasing the endosomal pH required for virus-cell fusion as well as interference with glycosylation of the cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2 [89]. In addition to its anti-viral activity, chloroquine has immune-modulating activity, which may synergistically enhance anti-viral effects in vivo. Meanwhile, a clinician from South Korea has reported the use of an anti-HIV drug combination, lopinavir, and ritonavir, to successfully treat SARS-CoV-2 shown in Fig. 1 [90], [91]. Researchers in China have reported full recovery from SARS-CoV-2 their blood plasma for possible use as a new treatment of the virus [87], [92], an approach is known as hyperimmune globin therapy. Corticosteroids should be avoided because of their potential in prolonging viral replication, as previously observed in MERS-CoV patients. These are the treatment options currently available, but all are under trial, as part of an effort to test more than 60 types of potential therapeutic drugs, as shown in Table 2.
Table 1

List of potential therapeutic option for SARS-COV-2.

S.N.DrugMechanismRiskRemarkReferences
1LopinavirLopinavir bind to membrane protein and enzyme for coronavirus replicationCardiac arrhythmias. Carefulness in patients with liver diseasesPreclinical[16], [93]
2RemdesivirInhibit the activity of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases; excise nucleotide analog inhibitors.Nausea and vomitingPreclinical[88]
3Chloroquine (Antimalarial)Viral DNA and RNA polymerase, viral protein, glycosylation, ACE2 cellular receptor inhibition, immunomodulation of cytokine release.Cardiac arrhythmias, retinal damage, especially, G6PD deficiency, Caution in diabeticsChloroquine has activity against pneumonia patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, specific data are not available.[89]
4Antimalarial (Hydroxychloroquine)In vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, inhibition of viral enzymes or processes such as viral DNA and RNA polymerase; 5ACE2 inhibition.Diabetics Significant drug interactionsHydroxychloroquine has activity against SARS-CoV-2.[93]
5AzithromycinReducing chemotaxis of neutrophils (PMNs) to the lungs by inhibiting cytokines (i.e., IL-8), inhibitionRisk of cardiac arrhythmiasReduce the excessive cytokine production associated with respiratory viral infections[93]
6Azithromycin Macrolide AntibacterialDownregulate inflammatory responsesBlocking the activation of nuclear transcription factors.Reduce the excessive cytokine production associated with respiratory viral infections[93]
7TocilizumabIL-6 Receptor-Inhibiting Monoclonal AntibodyGI perforation, hepatotoxicityTocilizumab inhibits IL-6-mediated receptors[94]
8SARS-COV-2 Convalescent PlasmaContain antibodies to SARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers may be conducted (optimally greater than 1:320)FDA approval required[95]
Table 2

List of probable drug targets against SARS-CoV-2.

Targeted viral componentsMechanism of actionStatusReferences
Viral spike glycoprotein S
S1Monoclonal antibodies against RBD inhibits virus-host cell binding.Under progress[97]
S2HR2P and P1 peptides inhibit fusion of S with a host cell receptorUnder progress[98]
Oligosaccharides (S)Griffithsin binds to oligosaccharides on S and inhibits virus-host cell bindingUnder progress[99]
SsiRNA based dsRNA inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2.Under progress[100]



Viral envelope, membrane, nucleocapsid, and accessory proteins
EsiRNA based dsRNA inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2.Under progress[101]
Hexamethylene amiloride ion act as ion channel inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2.Under progress[102]
MsiRNA based dsRNA, inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2.Under progress[103]
NsiRNA, PJ34, Monoclonal antibodiesUnder progress[104]
Accessory proteinssiRNA – dsRNA act as ORF protein inhibitors, SARS-CoV-2.Under progress[17]



Viral enzymes-based inhibiters
PLproGRL0617, Inhibitors of PLpro activity (Optimal activty)Under progress[105]
3CLproLopinavir, Inhibitors of 3CLpro activity; Broad spectrum effective in SARS-CoV-2. patients in non-randomized trialsUnder progress[10]
RdRpRibavirin, inhibits viral RNA synthesis found effective SARS-CoV-2.; dose need to optimizeUnder progress[106]
BCX4430Based on analogue to adenosine and inhibit viral RNA polymerase activity; Broad spectrumUnder progress[107]
RdRpAnalogues of acyclovir inhibit RdRp, effective against MERS–CoV and HCoV-NL63 • Further investigations required.Under progress[108]
Helicase5-Hydroxychromone derivatives disable the function of helicaseUnder progress[109]
SSYA10-001 and ADKs, disable the function of helicase Broad spectrum, effective against SARS-CoV-2.Under progress[110]
Angiotensin converting enzymeBenazepril (Lotensin), perindopril (Aceon), quinapril (Accupril), trandolapril (Mavik) Angiotensin -converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor BlockerUnder progress[111]
List of potential therapeutic option for SARS-COV-2. List of probable drug targets against SARS-CoV-2.

Vaccine development for SARS-CoV-2: hope against hope

Scientists are designing vaccines at various laboratories and institutions around the world as shown in Table 2. Vaccines are made using a highly conserved part of the viral genome, and more than 90 vaccines are under progress against SARS-CoV-2. Some technologies are being used that have never been used before for developing licensed vaccines. Other research groups have begun clinical trials on humans, while others are testing in animal models [96]. Potential vaccines needed to be work for all strains and any mutated variants, and likely to be very challenging to find a single vaccine that works for all [88]. The aim of vaccine development to expose the body to the antigen, without causing the disease. However, antigens will still cause an immune response that can block or kill the virus, if persons become infected later. One challenge that the antibody response against S and L is slightly different [112], and L type vaccine induces slightly different antibodies, it is unclear if this will confer cross-immunity to S type and vice versa [83]. In the context of the current waves of infection, unclear whether becoming co-infected with both L and S types at the same time leads to more serious illness [113]. SARS-CoV-2 are RNA-based viruses with a 3.4 kbp genome and a couple of changes in the genome of this virus [96], [113]. Mutations have been observed in S2 receptors, which are proteins responsible for the infection of host cells. Unfortunately, these viruses are more transmissible and provided challenges to vaccine development, and also need more study in this field [10]. There are several types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine currently under trial as shown in Table 3, based on genome. Seven research groups are working on inactivated vaccines of SARS-CoV-2 [164]. Twenty-five teams are developing viral vector vaccines, where the virus is genetically altered to induce the body to produce viral proteins. Some viral vector vaccines can destroy replicates inside the host cell, while others prevent replication due to the inactivation of viral genes. Almost 20 groups use the genetic sequences for SARS-CoV-2 proteins, which induce the immune response. Once these genetic instructions (RNA/DNA) are inserted into human cells, the host cells produce viral proteins. The viral spike protein is the main target of RNA/DNA vaccines. Another type of vaccine involves injecting SARS-CoV-2 proteins directly into the body. They can also use small fragments of protein (peptides) or the isolated outer-shell protein of SARS-CoV-2, such proteins can induce an immune response without damaging cells. Germany and the United Kingdom have approved their first two SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) approved for the first clinical trial of RNA-based BNT162b1 vaccine, developed with the use of a lipid nanoparticle, non-viral gene delivery system. The cell then transcribes and translates this genetic information into proteins, which generates an immune response. A team of research scientists working on three other, similar, mRNA vaccines. Similarly, Oxford also launching a trial of the chadOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, which is based on chimpanzee adenovirus, which includes the spike or S protein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2. The mRNA vaccine candidate developed by Imperial College is being tested in an animal model.
Table 3

List of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine under clinical trial.

S.N.Vaccine developmentProduct category of vaccineType of candidate vaccine descriptionCurrent status-DeveloperReferences
1INO-4800DNA basedDNA plasmid delivered by electroporation targeted for S1-RBD-proteinPhase-II and IIInovio Pharmaceuticals, CEPI, Korea National Institute of Health, International Vaccine Institute (IVI); Thermo Fisher Scientific; Beijing Advaccine Biotechnology; Richter-Helm BioLogic[114]
2BNT162 (a1, b1, b2, c2)RNA BasedS1-RBD-protein targetedPhase-II and III(BioNTech, Fosun Pharma,Pfizer); Rentschler ; Biopharma ; Fosun Pharma[115]
3SARS-CoV-2/aAPClentiviral vectorlentiviral vector, pathogen-specific artificial antigen-presenting dendritic cells targeted spike (S) glycoproteinPhase I(Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute)[116]
4LV-SMENP-DClentiviral vectorlentiviral minigene vaccine, dendritic cells modified with lentiviral vector and based on multiple viral antigensPhase I(Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute)[117]
5bacTRL-SpikeDNA basedDNA; bacTRL-targeted on Spike proteinPhase I(Symvivo Corporation, University of British Columbia, Dalhousie University)[118]
6Ad5-nCoVNon-replicating viral vectorRecombinant adenovirus type 5 vector targeted on Spike proteinPhase-III(CanSino Biologics,Institute of Biotechnology of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences); Beijing Institute of Biotechnology; Canada's National Research Council; Petrovax[43]
7ChAdOx1 nCoV-19Adenoviral vectorChAdOx1 is a replication-deficient simian adenoviral vector derived from isolate Y25 targeted on Spike proteinPhase-IIIUnited Kingdom[119]
8mRNA-1273RNA Vaccinelipid nanoparticle dispersion containing messenger RNA targeted on Spike proteinPhase I(Moderna, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases)[120]
9Ad5-nCoVSpike proteinrecombinant adenovirus type 5 vectorPhase I(CanSino Biologics, Institute of Biotechnology of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences)[121]
10Ad5-nCoVNon-ReplicatingNon-Replicating Viral Vector 2nd Gen E2b- Ad5 Spike, RBDPhase 2 ChiCTR2000031781 Phase 1 ChiCTR2000030906Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, PLA of China; CanSino Biological Inc./Beijing Institute of Biotechnology[122]
11DNA plasmid vaccine Electroporation deviceDNADNA plasmid. Vaccine encoding spike (S) protein delivered by ElectroporationPhase 1 NCT04336410Inovio Pharmaceuticals[115]
12d TBDInactivatedLive Attenuated Virus DeoptimizedPreclinicalOsaka University/ BIKEN/ NIBIOHN[123]
13Dendritic cell-based vaccineNon-replicatingNon-replicating viral vector; dendritic cell-based vaccinePre-clinicalVaxart / Emergent BioSolutions[124]
14Parainfluenza virus 5Non-replicating viral vectorparainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-based vaccine expressing the spike proteinPre-clinicalCentro Nacional Biotecnologia (CNB-CSIC), Spain130)
15Dendritic cell-based vaccineVirus-like particleVirus-like particle-based Dendritic Cell (DC)- targeting vaccinePre-clinicalUniversity of Manitoba[125]
16GX-19DNADNA Vaccine expressing SARC-CoV-2 S-proteinPre-ClinicalGenexine Consortium[126]
17DNA with electroporationDNA VaccineAdenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteinPre-ClinicalKarolinska Institute / Cobra Biologics (OPENCORONA Project)[127]
18Recombinant SARS CoV-2 glycoprotein nanoparticle vaccineProtein SubunitRecombinant SARS CoV-2 glycoprotein nanoparticle vaccine adjuvanted with Matrix MPhase-INovavax[128]
19Recombinant deactivated rabies virus containing S1Protein SubunitNon-replicating viral vectorPre-clinicalBharat Biotech/ Thomas Jefferson University (INDIA)[129]
20Adenovirus Type 5 VectorReplicating viral vectorAd5-nCoV is a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector (Ad5) vaccinePre-clinicalZydus Cadila (INDIA)[130]
21ChAdOx1-SNon-Replicating Viral VectorThe immune response generated against the spike proteinPhase-IIIUniversity of Oxford/AstraZeneca[131]
22LNPencapsulated mRNARNALipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA (mRNA-LNP) encoding the receptor-binding domain (RBD)Phase-IModerna/NIAID[132]
23Plasmid DNADNAMicroneedle array for delivery spike protein basedPre-ClinicalImmunomic Therapeutics, Inc./EpiVax, Inc./PharmaJet[133]
24NasoVAXNon-Replicating Viral Vectoradenovirus-based NasoVAX expressing SARS2-CoV spike proteinPre-ClinicalAltimmune[134]
25Deoptimized live attenuated vaccinesLive Attenuated VirusCodon deoptimized live attenuated vaccinesPre-ClinicalCodagenix/Serum Institute of India[135]
26Inactivated + alumInactivated viral proteinAs viral subunit protein InactivatedPhase -IISinovac[136]
273 LNP-mRNAsRNA basedmRNA vaccines encode antigensPhase-IIIBioNTech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer[137]
28mRNARNAa vaccine targeting the Spike protein receptor-binding domainPre-ClinicalCurevac[138]
29Plant-derived VLPVirus-like particleQVLP vaccine induced a substantial and sustained increase of hemagglutinin-specific polyfunctional CD4 T cells,Phase IMedicago Inc.[139]
30VLPVLPThe target antigen on the surface of the virus like particlePre-ClinicalARTES Biotechnology[140]
31Codon deoptimized live attenuated virusLive attenuated viruslive-attenuated vaccine, it has the potential to stimulate a robust T cell and antibody immune responsePre-ClinicalCodagenix / Serum Institute of India (INDIA)[141]
32Codon deoptimized live attenuated virusLive attenuated virusLive Attenuated Covid-19 vaccine based on codon de-optimized technology.Pre-ClinicalIndian Immunologicals Ltd/ Griffith University (INDIA)[142]
33VLA2001, InactivatedInactivatedInactivated + CpG 1018, Spike protein receptor-binding domainPre-clinicalValneva/ Dynavax[143]
34Ad5 vectorNon-Replicating Viral VectorAd5 adjuvanted Oral Vaccine platformPre-ClinicalVaxart[144]
35protein-based adjuvantedProtein SubunitNative like Trimeric subunit Spike Protein vaccinePre-ClinicalClover Biopharmaceuticals Inc./GSK/Dynavax[145]
36Microneedle arrays S1 subunitProtein SubunitMNA-MERS-S1 subunit vaccinesPre-ClinicalUniv. of Pittsburgh[146]
37OMV-based vaccineProtein subunitReceptor-binding domain (RBD) in the N-terminal surface subunit (S1), and then employs its C-terminal transmembrane subunit (S2) to fuse with the host cell membranePre-ClinicalBiOMViS Srl/Univ. of Trento[147]
39S proteinProtein SubunitProtein Subunit S protein (baculovirus production), Ii-Key peptide targeted for S proteinPre-ClinicalSanofi Pasteur/GSK[148]
40gp-96 backboneProtein SubunitActivates CD8 T cells, antigen presentingPre-ClinicalHeat Biologics/Univ. Of Miami[149]
41Peptide vaccineProtein SubunitSynthetic Long Peptide Vaccine candidate for S and M proteinsPre-ClinicalFBRI SRC VB VECTOR,Rospotrebnadzor, Koltsovo[150]
42SARS-COV-2 XWG-03 truncated SProtein subunitCOVID-19 XWG-03 truncated S (spike) proteins.Pre-ClinicalInnovax/Xiamen Univ./GSK[151]
43OMV-based vaccineProtein subunitOuter Membrane Vesicle (OMV)-subunitPre-ClinicalQuadram Institute Biosciences[152]
44Measles VectorReplicating Viral VectorNon-Replicating Viral Vector Oral Vaccine platform. (S, N targets).Pre-ClinicalInstitute Pasteur/Themis/Univ. of Pittsburg Center for Vaccine Research/Merck[153]
45Replication competent VSV chimeric virus technology (VSVΔG)Replicating Viral VectorReplication competent VSV chimeric virus technology (VSVΔG) delivering the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) glycoprotein.Pre-ClinicalIAVI/Merck[154]
46M2SRReplicating Viral VectorM2-deficient single replication (M2SR) influenza vectorPre-ClinicalUW-Madison/FluGen/Bharat Biotech[155]
47Ii-Key peptideProtein SubunitThe peptide sequence includes at least one cell-permeable peptide (CPP) domainPre-ClinicalGenerex/EpiVax[156]
48Molecular clamp stabilized Spike proteinProtein SubunitMolecular clamp stabilized Spike protein iis a COVID-19 protein-based vaccinePre-ClinicalUniversity of Queensland/GSK/Dynavax[157]
49Oral Ad5 SNon-Replicating Viral VectorAdenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5)-based vaccine vectorsPre-ClinicalStabilitech Biopharma Ltd[158]
50Spike-basedProtein subunitProtein Subunit RBD-based.Pre-ClinicalUniversity of Alberta[159]
51Measles VirusRNALive attenuated measles virus (S, N targets) is a COVID-19 viral-vector vaccine (S, N targets)Pre-ClinicalDZIF - German Center for Infection Research[160]
52Live viral vectored vaccine based on attenuated influenza virus backbone (intranasal)Replicating Viral VectorLive viral vectored vaccine based on attenuated influenza virus backbone (intranasal)Pre-ClinicalBiOCAD and IEM[161]
53Ad26.COV2-SNon-Replicating Viral VectorAd26 (alone or with MVA boost)Pre-ClinicalJanssen Pharmaceutical Companies[162]
54MVA-S encodedNon-replicating viral vectorNon-replicating viral vector MVA-S encoded SARS-CoV2; MVA-S encodedPre-clinicalDZIF – German Center for Infection Research[163]
List of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine under clinical trial.

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2

Neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) of coronaviruses tend to target the turmeric spike (S) protein (S1 and S2) and mediate the entry into a host cell. Which is actively involved in the attachment of cell and fusion of the cell membrane via the formation of a six-helix bundle (6-HB) fusion core [164]. The S protein has AA (Amino Acid) that are 77.5% identical and bind to ACE2 on human cells through the S1B domain. S1-RBD and S2 are identified as potential targets for Nabs. To identify antibodies that could potentially neutralize SARS-CoV2. SARS-CoV-2 patents generate immunoglobulin F (IgG) types of antibodies, which is binding to SARS-CoV-2 elements after the onset of disease and blocking SARS-CoV-2 entry of host cells, called neutralizing antibody (NAbs) [164], [165]. Possible targets of nAbs on the S protein of SARS-CoV-2as shown in Fig. 4. Monoclonal antibody (mAb), antigen-binding fragment (Fab), single-chain variable region fragment (scFv), or single-domain antibody binds to the RBD, S1 subunit (non-RBD, including NTD), or S2 of the viral S protein, blocking binding between the RBD and the respective receptor (for RBD-targeting nAbs), interfering with the conformational change of S (for S1-targeting nAbs), or hindering S2- mediated membrane fusion (for S2-targeting nAbs), leading to the inhibition of infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the host cells. Several human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed from memory B cells [166], [167]. A researcher from the field developed 51 cell lines from the humanized mice and evaluate the efficacy and 47D11 were found active and targeted against the S1B receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2. Pseudo typed lentiviral-based neutralization assay was performed to identify the efficacy of Nabs. The potential of pseudo-virus-neutralizing efficacy suggested that the neutralizing capacity of SARS-CoV-2-specific depends on the magnitude and binding affinity of antibodies [165]. Representative SARS-CoV RBD and MERS-CoV RBD-Targeting nAbs are mentioned in table 4.
Fig. 4

Potential targets of nAbs against SARS-CoV-2. This figure was created by using BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

Table 4

Representative SARS-CoV RBD- and MERS-CoV RBD-Targeting nAbs.

S.N.Antibody discovery Neutralizing monoclonal antibodiesPalatiformEpitope clustersbinding affinitiesProtective efficacyIC50References
13F11Humanized phage display librarysdAb (a single-domain antibody) llama Animal immunization and sequencing RBD PsV (pseudovirus)neutralizationBlocking RBD–ACE2Protect mice against the challenge of SARSIC50 = 0.14 μg/ml.[165]
2ab1B cells of convalescent patients; Single-cell sequencingNeutralize live SARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBD in the S1.Blocking RBD–ACE2Full protection of mice: 0.3 mg of IgG1 ab1.Reporter Gene neutralization assay: 200 ng/ml; LV neutralization: ND100 < 400 ng/ml[167]
3CB6B cells of convalescent patientsNeutralize live SARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBD in the S1.Blocking RBD–ACE2Protection of rhesus macaques: 50 mg/kg.PsV neutralization: ND50 = 0.036 μg/ml; LV neutralization: ND50 = 0.036 μg/ml;[168]
4P2C-1F11The plasma of convalescing patientsSARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 0.03 μg/ml.[169]
5rRBD-15A synthetic human Fab antibody librarySARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 12.2 nM.[170]
6CC12.1B cells of convalescent patientsSARS-CoV infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Full protection of Syrian hamsters: Antibody serum concentration of ~ 22 μg/ml.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 0.019 μg/ml.[171]
7COVA1-18B cells of convalescent patientsSARS-CoV infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of Syrian hamsters: Antibody serum concentration.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 8 ng/ml[172]
8BD-368–2B cells of convalescent patients; Single cell sequencingNeutralize live SARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBD in the S1.Blocking RBD–ACE2 RBD in the S1 domain with high affinity.B cells of convalescent patients; Single cell sequencingPsV neutralization: IC50 = 1.2 ng/ml; LV neutralization: IC50 = 15 ng/ml[166]
9B38Peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2-infected patientsNeutralize live SARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice: Lung viral load reduced by 32.8% compared with PBS controlLV (live virus) neutralization: IC50 = 0.177 μg/ml;[173]
10H4Peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2-infected patientsNeutralize live SARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice: Lung viral load reduced by 26% compared with PBS control.LV neutralization: IC50 = 0.896 μg/ml;[173]
117B11Animal immunization; hybridoma technologyNeutralize live SARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice, Lung viral load reduced by 26% compared with PBS control.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 10 μg/ml.[174]
12CR3022Gene cloning; Protein expressionSARS-CoV infection RBD.Blocking RBD–ACE2.LV neutralization: IC50 = ~ 0.114 μg/ml.[175]
134A8Peripheral blood of convalescent patientsNTDPsV neutralization: EC50 = 49 μg/ml[176]
14VHH-72-FcAnimal immunization and sequencingSARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice.PsV neutralization: IC50 ~ 0.2 μg/ml.[177]
15311mab–31B5B cells of convalescent patientsSARS-CoV (strain Urbani) infection RBDBlocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 33.8 ng/ml; PsV neutralization: IC50 = 69.8 ng/ml.[173]
16H014Animal immunization and phage displaySARS-CoV infection RBD.Blocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice: Lung viral load reduced by about 10 ~ 100 folds compared with PBS control.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 3 nM;[178]
17COV2-2196Peripheral blood of convalescent patientsSARS-CoV infection RBD.Blocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of hamsters: Viral RNA copy numbers and infectious virus titers in lung tissues were reduced by 4 logs or more compared with PBS control.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 0.7 ng/ml[179]
18COVA2-15A synthetic human Fab antibody librarySARS-CoV infection RBD.Blocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice.LV neutralization: IC50 = 7 ng/ml.[172]
19REGN10989Transgenic mice; Peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients; Next Generation SequencingSARS-CoV infection RBD.Blocking RBD–ACE2.Protection of mice.PsV neutralization: IC50 = 7.23 pM.[180]
Potential targets of nAbs against SARS-CoV-2. This figure was created by using BioRender (https://biorender.com/). Representative SARS-CoV RBD- and MERS-CoV RBD-Targeting nAbs.

Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 prevention and control procedures

According to the WHO and CDC, hand washing is the most effective procedure to prevent infection. Asymptomatic spreaders may be present in the community, feeling quite well but still able to pass on the virus [45], [72]. It is critical to understand that the asymptomatic spreading of the virus has been shown and that it can be transmitted before symptoms or detection [27]. There are three important concepts: identity, isolation, and information. Once a patient identified, they need to take actions regarding personal hygiene and prevention, such as limiting contact with others as much as possible, staying at home, using available PPE (N-Mask or FFP2-standard masks set by the European Union, gloves, and goggles), and avoid touching the eyes, nose, mouth, and wash hands. Used PPE should be discarded properly to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection [62]. Hand hygiene should be maintained, such as washing hands for 30 s with an effective soap or hand sanitizer with at least 70% alcohol [181]. High-touch surfaces that may be contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 can also be cleaned, using EPA-approved disinfectants. There is no any disinfectant currently approved by the EPA specifically for SARS-CoV-2, but several disinfectants are available [182]. Current observations suggest that people of all ages are generally susceptible to this new infectious disease. However, those who are in close contact with patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2, including health care workers and other patients in a hospital, are at higher risk of infection [182]. As of February 14, 2020, a total of 1716 health care workers in China were infected with SARS-CoV-2, comprising 3.8% of all patients nationally, 6 of whom have died [182], [183]. A team of research scientists at the Aix-Marseille University, in France, found that some SARS-CoV-2 strains can replicate at 60 °C, and the virus are not completely eliminated until the temperature rises to 90–100 °C. Peoples with chronic disease may suffer from increased stress due to the coronavirus pandemic because SARS-CoV-2 disease poses higher health risks for them. Stress during the pandemic, including fear, concerns about health and loved ones, changes in routine eating patterns, and difficulty in concentrating, can lead to a worsening of existing health problems, increased use of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Peoples with pre-existing mental health conditions should be aware of worsening caused by the pandemic. Stress can be reduced by taking care of close friends and family, and by helping others to cope, making the community stronger. It will be better to avoid stressful activities that cause anxiety, to keep updated with accurate information, to meditate regularly, try to eat healthy, balanced meals, exercise regularly, sleep more often, and develop an understanding of the actual risk.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 continues to increase its death toll as more people become infected. More than 215 countries are reporting new cases, and many struggle to limit their spread. SARS-CoV-2 has origins in mutations to coronavirus strains in animals, such as bats and pangolin. Poorly treated animals are stressed and are responsible for the emergence of new diseases. Wet markets where animals are in close contact with humans are the perfect breeding grounds for new diseases. Coronavirus not only causes respiratory problems, but may also damage the heart, kidneys, liver, and other organs. Half of the SARS-CoV-2 patients have blood or protein in their urine samples, an indication of early kidney damage. SARS-CoV-2 may also cause inflammation of the heart muscles and can cause disturbances in the heart rhythm, ultimately leading to cardiac arrest. The human gastrointestinal tract contains 100 times more ACE2 receptors than the lungs. Research shows that the virus could use these receptors to gain entry into other organs of the body and this might lead to multi-organ failure. The current scenario of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic proves that the world was not prepared for a disaster on such a scale. In the event of another pandemic in the future, do you believe the world will have learned lessons to prepare for what comes next, such as funding medical research, building better health care systems and infrastructure, and tracking potentially lethal viruses. Researchers are actively working on the characterization of new emerging strains, drug discovery, and the development of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Already, some excellent tools and techniques have been developed for use in the fight against SARS-CoV-2. There are 92 vaccines under development, 45 antibodies, 12 cell-based and, 5 RNA-based therapies, and 52 other therapeutic options are currently being explored to fight the new SARS-CoV-2. Various clinical trials are underway to investigate potential therapies against the SARS-COV-2 pandemic, but no effective treatment is effective available, to date. We hope this work will contribute to protecting and treating people at risk of developing a vaccine for severe SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Author’s contribution

D.D.S and D.K.Y. conceived and designed the project and collected data from the literature and write the manuscript. I.H. and E.H.C, support editing the Manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the results. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  134 in total

1.  Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed.

Authors:  Nicole Lurie; Melanie Saville; Richard Hatchett; Jane Halton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Utility of feline coronavirus antibody tests.

Authors:  Diane D Addie; Sophie le Poder; Paul Burr; Nicola Decaro; Elizabeth Graham; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Oswald Jarrett; Michael McDonald; Marina L Meli
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.015

3.  Activity of and effect of subcutaneous treatment with the broad-spectrum antiviral lectin griffithsin in two laboratory rodent models.

Authors:  Christopher Barton; J Calvin Kouokam; Amanda B Lasnik; Oded Foreman; Alexander Cambon; Guy Brock; David C Montefiori; Fakhrieh Vojdani; Alison A McCormick; Barry R O'Keefe; Kenneth E Palmer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Broad-spectrum in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of the antiviral protein griffithsin against emerging viruses of the family Coronaviridae.

Authors:  Barry R O'Keefe; Barbara Giomarelli; Dale L Barnard; Shilpa R Shenoy; Paul K S Chan; James B McMahon; Kenneth E Palmer; Brian W Barnett; David K Meyerholz; Christine L Wohlford-Lenane; Paul B McCray
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Yuan Yu; Jiqian Xu; Huaqing Shu; Jia'an Xia; Hong Liu; Yongran Wu; Lu Zhang; Zhui Yu; Minghao Fang; Ting Yu; Yaxin Wang; Shangwen Pan; Xiaojing Zou; Shiying Yuan; You Shang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 30.700

6.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Shuofeng Yuan; Kin-Hang Kok; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Hin Chu; Jin Yang; Fanfan Xing; Jieling Liu; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Simon Kam-Fai Lo; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Wan-Mui Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Jian-Piao Cai; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Honglin Chen; Christopher Kim-Ming Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Children Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Ali Amanati; Abdollah Karimi; Alireza Fahimzad; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri; Fatemeh Fallah; Alireza Mahdavi; Mahshid Talebian
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-03

8.  Structural Basis for Potent Neutralization of Betacoronaviruses by Single-Domain Camelid Antibodies.

Authors:  Daniel Wrapp; Dorien De Vlieger; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Gretel M Torres; Nianshuang Wang; Wander Van Breedam; Kenny Roose; Loes van Schie; Markus Hoffmann; Stefan Pöhlmann; Barney S Graham; Nico Callewaert; Bert Schepens; Xavier Saelens; Jason S McLellan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Infection Taking ACEI/ARB.

Authors:  Juan Simon Rico-Mesa; Averi White; Allen S Anderson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Studies in humanized mice and convalescent humans yield a SARS-CoV-2 antibody cocktail.

Authors:  Johanna Hansen; Alina Baum; Kristen E Pascal; Vincenzo Russo; Stephanie Giordano; Elzbieta Wloga; Benjamin O Fulton; Ying Yan; Katrina Koon; Krunal Patel; Kyung Min Chung; Aynur Hermann; Erica Ullman; Jonathan Cruz; Ashique Rafique; Tammy Huang; Jeanette Fairhurst; Christen Libertiny; Marine Malbec; Wen-Yi Lee; Richard Welsh; Glen Farr; Seth Pennington; Dipali Deshpande; Jemmie Cheng; Anke Watty; Pascal Bouffard; Robert Babb; Natasha Levenkova; Calvin Chen; Bojie Zhang; Annabel Romero Hernandez; Kei Saotome; Yi Zhou; Matthew Franklin; Sumathi Sivapalasingam; David Chien Lye; Stuart Weston; James Logue; Robert Haupt; Matthew Frieman; Gang Chen; William Olson; Andrew J Murphy; Neil Stahl; George D Yancopoulos; Christos A Kyratsous
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Novel Human Neutralizing mAb Recognizes Delta, Gamma and Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2 and Can Be Used in Combination with Sotrovimab.

Authors:  Margherita Passariello; Veronica Ferrucci; Emanuele Sasso; Lorenzo Manna; Rosa Rapuano Lembo; Stefano Pascarella; Giovanna Fusco; Nicola Zambrano; Massimo Zollo; Claudia De Lorenzo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  SARS-CoV-2: Emergence of New Variants and Effectiveness of Vaccines.

Authors:  Desh Deepak Singh; Amna Parveen; Dharmendra Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 3.  Current Potential Therapeutic Approaches against SARS-CoV-2: A Review.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar Yadav; Desh Deepak Singh; Ihn Han; Yogesh Kumar; Eun-Ha Choi
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-11-04

Review 4.  Therapeutic Potential of Ursolic Acid in Cancer and Diabetic Neuropathy Diseases.

Authors:  Manzar Alam; Sabeeha Ali; Sarfraz Ahmed; Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali; Mohd Adnan; Asimul Islam; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan; Dharmendra Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Rapid diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) detection: an evidence-based report.

Authors:  Manish Kumar Verma; Parshant Kumar Sharma; Henu Kumar Verma; Anand Narayan Singh; Desh Deepak Singh; Poonam Verma; Areena Hoda Siddiqui
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  SARS-CoV-2: Recent Variants and Clinical Efficacy of Antibody-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Desh Deepak Singh; Anshul Sharma; Hae-Jeung Lee; Dharmendra K Yadav
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 7.  COVID-19 Vaccines (Revisited) and Oral-Mucosal Vector System as a Potential Vaccine Platform.

Authors:  Muhammad Umer Ashraf; Yeji Kim; Sunil Kumar; Dongyeob Seo; Maryam Ashraf; Yong-Soo Bae
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 8.  Natural products can be used in therapeutic management of COVID-19: Probable mechanistic insights.

Authors:  Sabeeha Ali; Manzar Alam; Fatima Khatoon; Urooj Fatima; Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali; Mohd Adnan; Asimul Islam; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan; Mejdi Snoussi; Vincenzo De Feo
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.529

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.