Literature DB >> 33235405

Goals, beneficiaries, and indicators of waterfront revitalization in Great Lakes Areas of Concern and coastal communities.

Ted R Angradi1, Kathleen C Williams1, Joel C Hoffman1, David W Bolgrien1.   

Abstract

Cleanup of Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOCs) restores environmental benefits to waterfront communities and is an essential condition for revitalization. We define waterfront revitalization as policies or actions in terrestrial waterfront or adjacent aquatic areas that promote improvements in human socioeconomic well-being while protecting or improving the natural capital (the stocks of natural assets, biodiversity) that underlies all environmental, social, and economic benefits. Except for economic measures such as development investments, visitation rates, or commercial activity, evidence of waterfront revitalization in the Great Lakes is mostly anecdotal. We offer a perspective on waterfront revitalization that links indicators and metrics of sustainable revitalization to community goals and human beneficiaries. We compiled environmental, social, economic, and governance indicators and metrics of revitalization, many of which are based on or inspired by Great Lakes AOC case studies and community reutilization or sustainability plans. We highlight the role of indicators in avoiding unintended consequences of revitalization including environmental degradation and social inequity. Revitalization indicators can be used in planning for comparing alternative designs, and to track restoration progress. The relevancy of specific indicators and metrics will always depend on the local context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area of Concern; Great Lakes; Indicators; Natural capital; Unintended consequences; Waterfront revitalization

Year:  2019        PMID: 33235405      PMCID: PMC7681537          DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Great Lakes Res        ISSN: 0380-1330            Impact factor:   2.480


  13 in total

Review 1.  Linking ecosystem services and human health: the Eco-Health Relationship Browser.

Authors:  Laura E Jackson; Jessica Daniel; Betsy McCorkle; Alexandra Sears; Kathleen F Bush
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature.

Authors:  Danielle F Shanahan; Brenda B Lin; Robert Bush; Kevin J Gaston; Julie H Dean; Elizabeth Barber; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Empowering marginalized communities in water resources management: addressing inequitable practices in Participatory Model Building.

Authors:  Cameron Butler; Jan Adamowski
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Recruiting, integrating, and sustaining stakeholder participation in environmental management: A case study from the Great Lakes Areas of Concern.

Authors:  Ryan Holifield; Kathleen C Williams
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Alan D Steinman; Bradley J Cardinale; Wayne R Munns; Mary E Ogdahl; J David Allan; Ted Angadi; Sarah Bartlett; Kate Brauman; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Matt Doss; Diane Dupont; Annie Johns; Donna Kashian; Frank Lupi; Peter McIntyre; Todd Miller; Michael Moore; Rebecca Logsdon Muenich; Rajendra Poudel; James Price; Bill Provencher; Anne Rea; Jennifer Read; Steven Renzetti; Brent Sohngen; Erika Washburn
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Rivers and streams in the media: a content analysis of ecosystem services.

Authors:  Matthew A Weber; Shannon Caplan; Paul Ringold; Karen Blocksom
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.403

7.  Dramatic improvements in beach water quality following gull removal.

Authors:  Reagan R Converse; Julie L Kinzelman; Elizabeth A Sams; Edward Hudgens; Alfred P Dufour; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo-Domingo; Catherine A Kelty; Orin C Shanks; Shawn D Siefring; Richard A Haugland; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Community Theories of Change: Linking Environmental Justice to Sustainability through Stakeholder Perceptions in Milwaukee, (WI, USA).

Authors:  Kaitlyn Hornik; Bethany Cutts; Andrew Greenlee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits.

Authors:  Gust M Annis; Douglas R Pearsall; Katherine J Kahl; Erika L Washburn; Christopher A May; Rachael Franks Taylor; James B Cole; David N Ewert; Edward T Game; Patrick J Doran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Urban Health Indicator Tools of the Physical Environment: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Helen Pineo; Ketevan Glonti; Harry Rutter; Nici Zimmermann; Paul Wilkinson; Michael Davies
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.671

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Beneficial Use Impairments, Degradation of Aesthetics, and Human Health: A Review.

Authors:  Erik D Slawsky; Joel C Hoffman; Kristen N Cowan; Kristen M Rappazzo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

3.  Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern.

Authors:  Peter J Alsip; John H Hartig; Gail Krantzberg; Kathleen C Williams; Julia Wondolleck
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.