| Literature DB >> 33235234 |
J K Wenderott1,2,3, Carmen G Flesher4, Nicki A Baker4, Christopher K Neeley4, Oliver A Varban4, Carey N Lumeng5,6,7, Lutfiyya N Muhammad8, Chen Yeh3, Peter F Green9,10,11, Robert W O'Rourke12,13.
Abstract
Obesity-related type 2 diabetes (DM) is a major public health concern. Adipose tissue metabolic dysfunction, including fibrosis, plays a central role in DM pathogenesis. Obesity is associated with changes in adipose tissue extracellular matrix (ECM), but the impact of these changes on adipose tissue mechanics and their role in metabolic disease is poorly defined. This study utilized atomic force microscopy (AFM) to quantify difference in elasticity between human DM and non-diabetic (NDM) visceral adipose tissue. The mean elastic modulus of DM adipose tissue was twice that of NDM adipose tissue (11.50 kPa vs. 4.48 kPa) to a 95% confidence level, with significant variability in elasticity of DM compared to NDM adipose tissue. Histologic and chemical measures of fibrosis revealed increased hydroxyproline content in DM adipose tissue, but no difference in Sirius Red staining between DM and NDM tissues. These findings support the hypothesis that fibrosis, evidenced by increased elastic modulus, is enhanced in DM adipose tissue, and suggest that measures of tissue mechanics may better resolve disease-specific differences in adipose tissue fibrosis compared with histologic measures. These data demonstrate the power of AFM nanoindentation to probe tissue mechanics, and delineate the impact of metabolic disease on the mechanical properties of adipose tissue.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33235234 PMCID: PMC7686328 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77498-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of AFM nanoindentation measurement with example raw force-indentation data. At point 1, the cantilever is removed from interaction with the tissue surface. The cantilever approaches the tissue surface (point 2), ultimately contacting and indenting into the tissue (points 3 and 4). Once the set point cantilever deflection has been reached (corresponding with a set force), the tip is retracted from the tissue surface (points 5 and 6). On the retraction curve, it is not uncommon to see a small spike in deflection as the tip pulls away from the sample (between points 4 and 5).
Subject demographics.
| AFM, adipocyte sizing, Sirius Red | Hydroxyproline | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM (n = 8) | NDM (n = 9) | DM (n = 12) | NDM (n = 15) | |||
| Age | 45 (6.5) | 44 (5.2) | 0.676 | 46 (7.5) | 42 (4.3) | 0.156 |
| BMI | 45 (8.1) | 42 (6.6) | 0.453 | 45 (7.4) | 48 (6.5) | 0.283 |
| HbA1c | 6.3 (0.8) | 5.2 (0.3) | 0.003 | 6.7 (0.7) | 5.3 (0.2) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 50% | 22% | 0.335 | 58% | 20% | 0.057 |
| Sleep apnea | 50% | 56% | > 0.999 | 58% | 33% | 0.258 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 25% | 0% | 0.206 | 42% | 7% | 0.060 |
| ACE inhibitor | 25% | 22% | > 0.999 | 17% | 20% | > 0.999 |
| β-Blocker | 0% | 0% | > 0.999 | 17% | 0% | 0.188 |
| Statin | 50% | 0% | 0.029 | 50% | 7% | 0.024 |
| Insulin | 25% | 0% | 0.206 | 42% | 0% | 0.010 |
| Metformin | 100% | 0% | < 0.001 | 67% | 13% | 0.007 |
| Sulfonylurea | 12% | 0% | 0.471 | 8% | 0% | 0.444 |
| Thiazolidine-dione | 12% | 0% | 0.471 | 8% | 0% | 0.444 |
*Independent t-test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare continuous and dichotomous variables respectively between DM and NDM groups; age (years), BMI (kg/m2), and HbA1c (%) shown as mean with standard deviation in parentheses.
Figure 2Raw DM and NDM moduli data with Gauss, GaussMod, and LogNormal distribution fits (left). LogNormal distribution fits shaded for both DM and NDM adipose tissues (right).
Figure 3(a) Jitter plots of log-transformed elastic moduli of tissues from NDM and DM populations, center bar represents means, boxes represent interquartile ranges, and error bars represent standard deviations. (b) Box plots of log-transformed elastic moduli for individual subjects (subjects from each population that were measured twice are marked black) center circles represents means, boxes represent interquartile ranges, and error bars represent standard deviations. (c) Locoregional elastic moduli maps for two representative DM (dark grey dots) and NDM (light grey dots) 5 × 5 µm tissue samples. One dot represents a single elastic modulus value extracted from a 5 × 5 µm region of tissue.
Adipose tissue moduli statistics.
| NDM log outcome (kPa) | NDM outcome (kPa) | DM log outcome (kPa) | DM outcome (kPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 764 | 560 | ||
| Mean | 1.15 | 4.48 | 1.87 | 11.50 |
| SD | 0.79 | 4.81 | 1.00 | 16.79 |
| Median | 1.14 | 3.12 | 1.71 | 5.51 |
N number of data points measured, SD standard deviation.
Figure 4(a) Representative fluorescence images of sectioned VAT (scale bars: 100 µm) used for quantifying adipocyte area; (b) average adipocyte area (µm2) displayed as bar graphs (left, **p = 0.004 comparing DM and NDM average adipocyte area, controlling for age and BMI; error bars display standard error of mean), and adipocyte area frequency as histograms (right, p = 0.003 (**), 0.08, 0.184 (ns), 0.013 (*) respectively for each sizing group comparing DM and NDM adipocyte area frequency and controlling for age and BMI, generalized linear mixed model with negative binomial distribution); (c) hydroxyproline content in VAT: ordinate; hydroxyproline (µg/mg tissue); *p = 0.022 comparing DM and NDM groups, independent t-test; error bars display standard error of mean; (d) representative standard light microscopy (left) and polarized light (right) images of sectioned, Sirius Red-stained human VAT (scale bars: 100 µm); (e) quantified Sirius Red staining in VAT comparing DM and NDM groups; p = 0.437 comparing DM and NDM groups, independent t-test; error bars display standard error of mean.