| Literature DB >> 33235037 |
Michele A Manahan1, Fred Fedok1, Caryn Davidson1, Jamil Ahmad1, Minas Constantinides1, Richard Davis1, Oren Friedman1, Robert Gilman1, Lisa Ishii1, Geoffrey Keyes1, Samuel J Lin1, Benjamin Marcus1, Alan Matarasso1, Sam P Most1, Faisal Quereshy1, Sammy Sinno1, Derek Steinbacher1, Travis Tollefson1, Rod J Rohrich1.
Abstract
SUMMARY: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery commissioned the multidisciplinary Rhinoplasty Performance Measure Development Work Group to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing both functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. One outcome measure and three process measures were identified. The outcome looked at patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty procedures. The process measures look at motivations and expectations of the procedure, airway assessment, and nonnarcotic shared decision-making strategies for pain management. All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Rhinoplasty Society, and the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. The Work Group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Maintenance of Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33235037 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg ISSN: 0032-1052 Impact factor: 4.730