| Literature DB >> 33234401 |
Alessandro Conforti1, Silvia Picarelli2, Luigi Carbone2, Antonio La Marca3, Roberta Venturella4, Alberto Vaiarelli5, Danilo Cimadomo5, Fulvio Zullo2, Laura Rienzi5, Filippo Maria Ubaldi5, Carlo Alviggi2.
Abstract
The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts is increasing in IVF centres. However, little is known about the perinatal and obstetric outcomes of this procedure. In an attempt to further elucidate these issues, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare cryopreserved transfer with fresh blastocyst embryo transfer. The results show that the risk of both preterm (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99, P = 0.04) and low birthweight births (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.04) was significantly lower after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer than after fresh blastocyst transfer. The rate of large for gestational age births was significantly higher (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.55-1.82, P < 0.00001) and the rate of small for gestational age births significantly lower (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, P < 0.00001) after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer. The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts was associated with a significantly lower risk of placental abruption (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83, P = 0.003) but a significantly higher risk of Caesarean section (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.43, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes associated with the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts differ from those associated with fresh blastocyst transfer.Entities:
Keywords: ART; Blastocyst; Cryopreserved cycles; Fresh cycles; Perinatal outcome
Year: 2020 PMID: 33234401 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biomed Online ISSN: 1472-6483 Impact factor: 3.828