| Literature DB >> 33234031 |
Jiequn Li1, Zhulin Yang2, Shengfu Huang2, Daiqiang Li3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) is a highly aggressive epithelial malignancy and has a poor prognosis for the insensitivity to therapies and difficulty in detection. Novel targets and biomarkers are urgently needed to develop for functional, diagnostic and prognostic application on EHCC.Entities:
Keywords: BIRC7; STC2; extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; immunohistochemistry
Year: 2020 PMID: 33234031 PMCID: PMC7705185 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820971676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1533-0338
Correlation Between BIRC7/STC2 Expression and the Clinicopathological Features in 100 EHCC Tissues.
| Characteristics | n | BIRC7 | STC2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pos (n, %) | χ2 | P value | Pos (n, %) | χ2 | P value | ||
| Age (year) | |||||||
| ≤45 years | 17 | 10 (58.8) | 0.066 | 0.797 | 11 (64.7) | 0.378 | 0.539 |
| >45 years | 83 | 46 (55.4) | 47 (56.6) | ||||
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 61 | 37 (60.7) | 1.376 | 0.241 | 32 (52.5) | 1.971 | 0.160 |
| Female | 39 | 19 (48.7) | 26 (66.7) | ||||
| Differentiation | |||||||
| Well | 31 | 12 (38.7) | 5.560 | 0.062 | 14 (45.2) | 3.064 | 0.216 |
| Moderately | 34 | 21 (61.8) | 22 (64.7) | ||||
| Poorly | 35 | 23 (65.7) | 22 (62.9) | ||||
| Tumor size | |||||||
| ≤3cm | 62 | 32 (51.6) | 1.274 | 0.259 | 35 (56.5) | 0.161 | 0.689 |
| >3cm | 38 | 24 (63.2) | 23 (60.5) | ||||
| Lymphnode metastasis | |||||||
| No | 62 | 26 (41.9) | 13.098 | 0.000 | 25 (40.3) | 20.930 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 38 | 30 (78.9) | 33 (86.8) | ||||
| Invasion | |||||||
| No | 33 | 13 (39.4) | 5.512 | 0.023 | 12 (36.4) | 9.465 | 0.002 |
| Yes | 67 | 43 (67.2) | 46 (68.7) | ||||
| TNM stage | |||||||
| Ⅰ+Ⅱ | 35 | 13 (37.1) | 10.303 | 0.006 | 11 (31.4) | 18.751 | 0.000 |
| III | 38 | 22 (57.9) | 24 (63.2) | ||||
| IV | 27 | 21 (77.8) | 23 (85.2) | ||||
| Surgery | |||||||
| Radical | 54 | 22 (40.7) | 12.097 | 0.002 | 22 (40.7) | 14.371 | 0.001 |
| Palliative | 36 | 28 (77.8) | 28 (77.8) | ||||
| Biopsy | 10 | 6 (60.0) | 8 (80.0) | ||||
Figure 1.Representative immunohistochemical staining of BIRC7, ×200. The technical negative (IgG) control in EHCC (A); The negative expression of BIRC7 in normal EHBT tissues (B) and well differentiated EHCC (C); The positive expression of BIRC7 in moderately-differentiated EHCC (D), precancerous EHBT (E) and EHBT adenomas (F).
Figure 2.Representative immunohistochemical staining of STC2, ×200, The technical negative (IgG) contorl in EHCC (A); The negative expression of STC2 in normal EHBT tissues (B) and well differentiated EHCC (C); The positive expression of STC2 in moderately-differentiated EHCC (D), precancerous EHBT (E) and EHBT adenomas (F).
Different Levels of BIRC7 and STC2 Expression in EHCC Peritumoral EHBT, EHBT Adenomas and Normal EHBT Tissues.
| Tissue type | n | BIRC7 positive (%) | STC2 positive (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| EHCC | 100 | 56 (56.0) | 58 (58.0) |
| Peritumoral EHBT | 30 | 9 (30.0) * | 10 (33.3) * |
| EHBT adenomas | 10 | 1 (10.0) * | 2 (20.0) * |
| Normal EHBT | 15 | 0 (0.0) † | 0 (0.0) † |
*, P < 0.05, vs EHCC; †, P < 0.01 vs EHCC.
Correlation Between BIRC7 and STC2 Expression in 100 EHCC Tissues.
| STC2 | Total | Chi-square |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||
| BIRC7 | 9.421 | 0.002 | |||
| Positive | 40 | 16 | 56 | ||
| Negative | 18 | 26 | 44 | ||
| Total | 58 | 42 | 100 | ||
The Relationship Between Clinicopathological Characteristics, BIRC7/STC2 Expression and Mean Survival Time of Patients With EHCC.
| Characteristics | n | Mean survival (month) | Chi-square |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 61 | 12.67(3-30) | 0.001 | 0.980 |
| Female | 39 | 12.59(4-30) | ||
| Age (year) | ||||
| ≤ 45 | 17 | 13.82(3-30) | 0.667 | 0.414 |
| > 45 | 83 | 12.10(3-30) | ||
| Differentiation | ||||
| Well | 31 | 18.46(5-30) | 27.655 | 0.000 |
| Moderately | 34 | 11.41(3-30) | ||
| Poorly | 35 | 7.97(3-30) | ||
| Tumor size | ||||
| ≤3 cm | 62 | 12.62(3-30) | 0.235 | 0.628 |
| >3 cm | 38 | 12.03 (5-30) | ||
| TNM stage | ||||
| Ⅰ+Ⅱ | 35 | 18.57(7-30) | 57.569 | 0.000 |
| III | 38 | 11.05(3-30) | ||
| IV | 27 | 6.26(3-13) | ||
| Lymphnode metastasis | ||||
| No | 62 | 15.52(4-30) | 39.001 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 38 | 7.18(3-25) | ||
| Invasion | ||||
| No | 33 | 17.52(4-30) | 17.399 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 67 | 9.87 (3-30) | ||
| Surgery | ||||
| Radical | 54 | 16.62(3-30) | 48.388 | 0.000 |
| Palliative | 36 | 7.58(4-24) | ||
| Biopsy | 10 | 6.90(3-14) | ||
| BIRC7 | ||||
| Negative | 44 | 17.86(6-30) | 23.060 | 0.000 |
| Positive | 56 | 9.07(3-28) | ||
| STC2 | ||||
| Negative | 42 | 18.07(5-30) | 22.514 | 0.000 |
| Positive | 58 | 9.22(3-28) |
Figure 3.The correlation between the expression of BIRC7 or STC2 and OS of EHCC patients. A, The OS of EHCC patients with BIRC7-positive and BIRC7-negative expression; B, The OS of EHCC patients with STC2-positive and STC2-negative expression.
Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients With EHCC.
| Characteristics | Factors | B | SE | Wald | P | RR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Differentiated degree | Well/moderately/poorly | 0.537 | 0.154 | 12.159 | 0.000 | 1.711 | 1.265 | 2.314 |
| Tumor size | ≤3cm/>3cm | 0.530 | 0.248 | 4.567 | 0.033 | 1.699 | 1.045 | 2.762 |
| Lymphnode metastasis | No/yes | 0.917 | 0.295 | 9.663 | 0.002 | 2.502 | 1.403 | 4.460 |
| Invasion | No/yes | 1.078 | 0.368 | 8.581 | 0.003 | 2.939 | 1.429 | 6.045 |
| TNM stage | I, II/III/IV | 0.756 | 0.264 | 8.200 | 0.004 | 2.130 | 1.269 | 3.573 |
| Surgery | Radical/ Palliative/ Biopsy | 0.601 | 0.188 | 10.220 | 0.001 | 1.824 | 1.262 | 2.637 |
| BIRC7 | Negative /Positive | 0.912 | 0.289 | 9.959 | 0.002 | 2.489 | 1.413 | 4.386 |
| STC2 | Negative /Positive | 0.740 | 0.283 | 6.837 | 0.009 | 2.096 | 1.204 | 3.650 |
Figure 4.Multivariate analysis. ROC of Diagonal segments was produced by ties of BIRC7 (A) and STC2 (B) in EHCC patients.