Literature DB >> 33233152

How consumers' perception and information processing affect their acceptance of genetically modified foods in China: A risk communication perspective.

Qiaozhe Guo1, Nengzhi Yao2, Weiwei Zhu3.   

Abstract

This study aims to explore the roles of consumers' risk and benefit perception and food information processes in predicting their acceptance of genetically modified food. We integrate the protective action decision and heuristic systematic models to develop a conceptual model to predict customers' purchase intention. We conducted a survey questionnaire with measures adapted from existing Likert scales. We used a sample of 573 respondents from Shandong Province, China, comprising people who had ever purchased genetically modified products. We tested our hypotheses using a structural equation model. Results suggest that perceived risk is a negative determinant of purchase intention, while perceived benefit is a positive factor of purchase intention. Moreover, perceived benefit is an important predictor of purchase intention. Perceived risk significantly affects information need, information seeking, and systematic processing. Perceived benefit has a positive relationship with information need and systematic processing. Information seeking is stimulated by information need and further predicts systematic processing. Our results suggest the effectiveness of the protective action decision and heuristic systematic models in predicting people's intention to purchase genetically modified food and highlight the importance of risk communications in this context.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetically modified food; Information processing; Risk communication; Risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33233152     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Res Int        ISSN: 0963-9969            Impact factor:   6.475


  6 in total

1.  No Control, No Consumption: Association of Low Perceived Control and Intention to Accept Genetically Modified Food.

Authors:  Shen-Long Yang; Feng Yu; Kai Li; Ting-Ting Rao; Da-Peng Lian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.

Authors:  Sumran Ali; Muhammad Asim Nawaz; Muhammad Ghufran; Sumaira Nazar Hussain; Aljaifi Saddam Hussein Mohammed
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Framing and Tailoring Prefactual Messages to Reduce Red Meat Consumption: Predicting Effects Through a Psychology-Based Graphical Causal Model.

Authors:  Patrizia Catellani; Valentina Carfora; Marco Piastra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-09

4.  Media Source Characteristics Regarding Food Fraud Misinformation According to the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) in China: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Angela Chang; Peter Johannes Schulz; Wen Jiao; Guoming Yu; Ya Yang
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-16

5.  Path relationship of consumers' perceived susceptibility and severity of health problems with their purchase of buckwheat functional foods in China.

Authors:  Yixin Nong; Minjuan Zhao; Hsiaoping Chien
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-20

6.  An Experimental Evidence on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food through Advertisement Framing on Health and Environmental Benefits, Objective Knowledge, and Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Syed Hassan Raza; Umer Zaman; Paulo Ferreira; Pablo Farías
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.