Literature DB >> 33230739

Comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities in presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy patients: a multicenter study.

Jafar Mehvari Habibabadi1, Abtin Doroudinia2, Abbas Yousefi Koma2, Sayed Sohrab Hashemi Fesharaki3, Sobhan Aarabi4.   

Abstract

Intractable drug-resistant magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) negative epilepsy in one of the complicated issues in neurology. Epilepsy surgery is beneficial treatment of intractable seizures, but precise localization of epileptogenic zone is a major concern. Thirty-four MRI negative drug-resistant epilepsy patients underwent video electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission tomography (PET) scan, and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) MRI from 2014 to 2019. Then, the findings of PET scan and VBM were compared with semiology and long-term electrophysiology. Cohen's kappa-coefficient (k) test was utilized to measure the agreement between our modalities. Among 34 patients with age ranging from 8 to 49 (mean: 29.00 ± standard deviation: 10.35), 19 were male (55.9%) and 15 were female (44.1%). Twenty-one patients (61.76%) had right temporal, 12 patients (35.3%) had left and one patient had bilateral temporal ictal focus according to video EEG. Inter-rater agreement analysis showed that the kappa index between video EEG and PET scan was of almost acceptable (more than 0.4) and there was poor agreement between video EEG and VBM (kappa index = 0.099). PET is highly concordant with video EEG in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and has a considerable agreement in localizing epileptogenic zone while VBM is less.
© 2020. Belgian Neurological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET scan; Refractory drug-resistant epilepsy; Voxel-based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33230739     DOI: 10.1007/s13760-020-01550-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg        ISSN: 0300-9009            Impact factor:   2.396


  5 in total

1.  (18)F-FDG PET in localization of frontal lobe epilepsy: comparison of visual and SPM analysis.

Authors:  Yu Kyeong Kim; Dong Soo Lee; Sang Kun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; June-Key Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Burden of intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Samuel Wiebe
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  2006

3.  Intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison of positron emission tomography with qualitative and quantitative MR.

Authors:  W Helveston; R Gilmore; S Roper; S Mastin; R Quisling; W Drane; E Eikman; C Leonard; S Browd; D Childress
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Voxel-based morphometric magnetic resonance imaging postprocessing in non-lesional pediatric epilepsy patients using pediatric normal databases.

Authors:  W Wang; Y Lin; S Wang; S Jones; R Prayson; A N V Moosa; A McBride; J Gonzalez-Martinez; W Bingaman; I Najm; A Alexopoulos; Z I Wang
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 6.089

5.  Clinical FDG-PET Findings in Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Concordance with EEG and MRI.

Authors:  Zeenat Jaisani; Robert S Miletich; Murali Ramanathan; Arie L Weinstock
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.486

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  International consensus on the use of [18F]-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients affected by epilepsy.

Authors:  Mei Tian; Yasuyoshi Watanabe; Keon Wook Kang; Koji Murakami; Arturo Chiti; Ignasi Carrio; A Cahid Civelek; Jianhua Feng; Yuankai Zhu; Rui Zhou; Shuang Wu; Junming Zhu; Yao Ding; Kai Zhang; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.