Literature DB >> 33230308

Genotype-first approach to the detection of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk, and effects of risk disclosure to biobank participants.

Liis Leitsalu1, Marili Palover1,2, Timo Tõnis Sikka1,2, Anu Reigo1, Mart Kals1,3, Kalle Pärn1,3, Tiit Nikopensius1, Tõnu Esko1, Andres Metspalu1,2, Peeter Padrik4,5, Neeme Tõnisson6,7.   

Abstract

Genotype-first approach allows to systematically identify carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 genes conferring a high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer. Participants of the Estonian biobank have expressed support for the disclosure of clinically significant findings. With an Estonian biobank cohort, we applied a genotype-first approach, contacted carriers, and offered return of results with genetic counseling. We evaluated participants' responses to and the clinical utility of the reporting of actionable genetic findings. Twenty-two of 40 contacted carriers of 17 pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants responded and chose to receive results. Eight of these 22 participants qualified for high-risk assessment based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Twenty of 21 counseled participants appreciated being contacted. Relatives of 10 participants underwent cascade screening. Five of 16 eligible female BRCA1/2 variant carriers chose to undergo risk-reducing surgery, and 10 adhered to surveillance recommendations over the 30-month follow-up period. We recommend the return of results to population-based biobank participants; this approach could be viewed as a model for population-wide genetic testing. The genotype-first approach permits the identification of individuals at high risk who would not be identified by application of an approach based on personal and family histories only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33230308      PMCID: PMC7940387          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00760-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  6 in total

1.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Returning individual genomic results to population-based cohort study participants with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Kinuko Ohneda; Yohei Hamanaka; Hiroshi Kawame; Nobuo Fuse; Fuji Nagami; Yoichi Suzuki; Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata; Muneaki Shimada; Atsushi Masamune; Yoko Aoki; Takanori Ishida; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Returning actionable genomic results in a research biobank: Analytic validity, clinical implementation, and resource utilization.

Authors:  Carrie L Blout Zawatsky; Nidhi Shah; Kalotina Machini; Emma Perez; Kurt D Christensen; Hana Zouk; Marcie Steeves; Christopher Koch; Melissa Uveges; Janelle Shea; Nina Gold; Joel Krier; Natalie Boutin; Lisa Mahanta; Heidi L Rehm; Scott T Weiss; Elizabeth W Karlson; Jordan W Smoller; Matthew S Lebo; Robert C Green
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Reaching for Precision Healthcare in Finland via Use of Genomic Data.

Authors:  Tiina Wahlfors; Birgit Simell; Kati Kristiansson; Sirpa Soini; Terhi Kilpi; Marina Erhola; Markus Perola
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Precise, Genotype-First Breast Cancer Prevention: Experience With Transferring Monogenic Findings From a Population Biobank to the Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Hannes Jürgens; Laura Roht; Liis Leitsalu; Margit Nõukas; Marili Palover; Tiit Nikopensius; Anu Reigo; Mart Kals; Kersti Kallak; Riina Kütner; Kai Budrikas; Saskia Kuusk; Vahur Valvere; Piret Laidre; Kadri Toome; Kadri Rekker; Mikk Tooming; Tiina Kahre; Krista Kruuv-Käo; Katrin Õunap; Peeter Padrik; Andres Metspalu; Tõnu Esko; Krista Fischer; Neeme Tõnisson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Do Biobank Recall Studies Matter? Long-Term Follow-Up of Research Participants With Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Miriam Nurm; Anu Reigo; Margit Nõukas; Liis Leitsalu; Tiit Nikopensius; Marili Palover; Tarmo Annilo; Maris Alver; Aet Saar; Toomas Marandi; Tiia Ainla; Andres Metspalu; Tõnu Esko; Neeme Tõnisson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.772

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.