| Literature DB >> 33228185 |
Larisa V Politanskaya1, Pavel A Fedyushin1, Tatyana V Rybalova1, Artem S Bogomyakov2, Nargiz B Asanbaeva1, Evgeny V Tretyakov1,3.
Abstract
New stable polyfluorinated nitroxide radicals for use in cross-coupling reactions, namely, N-tert-butyl-N-oxyamino-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-iodobenzene and N-tert-butyl-N-oxyamino-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-ethynylbenzene, were prepared from perfluoroiodobenzene. The reaction of the polyfluoro derivative with tert-butylamine under autoclaving conditions leading to the formation of N-tert-butyl-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-iodoaniline proved to be the key stage of the whole process. The fluorinated tert-butyl iodophenyl nitroxide was found to form in a solid state via N-O···I halogen bonds, a one-dimensional assembly of the radicals. The acceptor role of the nitroxide group in the halogen bonding changes to a donor role when the nitroxide reacts with Cu(hfac)2. In the last case, zero-dimensional assembly prevails, giving a three-spin complex with axial coordinated nitroxide groups and, as a consequence, causing ferromagnetic intramolecular exchange interactions between Cu(II) and radical spins.Entities:
Keywords: aromatic nucleophilic substitution; fluoroarenes; functionalized nitroxides; stable organic radicals; tert-butylarylnitroxides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33228185 PMCID: PMC7699513 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Synthesized polyfluorinated tert-butylarylnitroxides.
Scheme 1Synthesis of polyfluorinated tert-butylarylnitroxides 4 and 5.
Figure 2Experimental (black curve) and simulated (red curve) electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of 4.
Figure 3Experimental (black curves) and simulated (red curves) ESR spectra of 5; (a) the whole spectrum; (b) the central component.
Figure 4Molecular structure (a) and fragments of crystal structure (b,c) of nitroxide radical 4 (the thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level).
XRD data for compounds 4, [Cu(hfac)2(4)2] and [Cu(hfac)2(5)].
| Compound | 4 | [Cu(hfac)2(4)2] | [Cu(hfac)2(5)] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C10H9F4INO | C30H20CuF20I2N2O6 | C22H12CuF16NO5 |
| Formula weight | 362.08 | 1201.82 | 737.87 |
| Crystal system | Orthorhombic | Triclinic | Triclinic |
| Space group |
| ||
| Unit cell dimensions | 11.5462(4) | 10.0763(9) | 9.132(1) |
| 12.1680(5) | 13.784(1) | 10.472(1) | |
| 17.8601(7) | 16.009(2) | 17.273 (2) | |
| 90 | 96.469(3) | 75.370(6) | |
| 90 | 102.396(4) | 83.253(6) | |
| 90 | 104.941(3) | 65.505(5) | |
| Volume, Å3 | 2509.2(2) | 2064.7(3) | 1454.3(3) |
|
| 8 | 2 | 2 |
| 1384 | 1154 | 728 | |
| Density (calcd.), Mg·m−3 | 1.917 | 1.933 | 1.685 |
| Abs. coefficient, mm−1 | 2.59 | 2.16 | 0.89 |
| Crystal size, mm | 0.90 × 0.30 × 0.10 | 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.01 | 0.25 × 0.24 × 0.14 |
| 0.544, 0.862 | 0.722, 0.862 | 0.825, 0.928 | |
| Reflections collected | 28215 | 34134 | 28365 |
| Independent reflections [ | 3516 | 7322 | 5688 |
| Reflections observed (I > 2σ(I)) | 2741 | 3850 | 2856 |
|
| 0.048 | 0.089 | 0.074 |
| θ range for data collection (°) | 2.3–30.4 | 1.6–25.2 | 2.194–26.088 |
| Range of | −13→16 | −12→11 | −11→11 |
| −16→16 | −16→16 | −12→12 | |
|
| −23→24 | −19→18 | −21→21 |
| Completeness to θ 50° (%) | 100 | 99.1 | 99.7 |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 3516/0/157 | 7322/0/553 | 5688/6/503 |
| Final | 0.040 | 0.062 | 0.087 |
| Final | 0.115 | 0.173 | 0.324 |
| Goodness-of-fit on | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.05 |
| Largest diff. peak/hole, e·Å−3 | 1.44, −1.12 | 0.71, −0.64 | 0.64, −0.56 |
Selected geometrical parameters for 4 and [Cu(hfac)2(4)2] (two independent molecules).
| Compound | 4 | [Cu(hfac)2(4)2] | [Cu(hfac)2(4)2]′ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bond lengths, Å | |||
| Cu1–O1 | - | 2.401(8) | 2.380(7) |
| Cu1–O2 | - | 1.933(6) | 1.954(6) |
| Cu1–O3 | - | 1.955(6) | 1.954(5) |
| C4–I1 | 2.079(4) | 2.062(9) | 2.060(8) |
| N1–O1 | 1.278(4) | 1.29(1) | 1.283(9) |
| N1–C1 | 1.428(4) | 1.43(1) | 1.41(1) |
| N1–C7 | 1.493(5) | 1.47(1) | 1.50(1) |
| Bond angles, ° | |||
| O2–Cu1–O1 | - | 95.7(2) | 98.6(2) |
| O3–Cu1–O1 | - | 91.5(3) | 91.2(2) |
| O2–Cu1–O3 | - | 92.3(2) | 92.3(2) |
| O1–N1–C1 | 115.7(3) | 115.8(7) | 115.9(6) |
| O1–N1–C7 | 118.0(3) | 117.2(7) | 116.8(6) |
| C1–N1–C7 | 125.3(3) | 125.7(7) | 126.4(6) |
Figure 5Molecular structure ((a) one of the independent molecules) and fragments of crystal structure (b) of the [Cu(hfac)2(4)2] complex (the thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level).
Figure 6The µeff(T) (●) and 1/χ(T) (□) dependences for the [Cu(hfac)2(4)2] complex (solid curves are theoretical ones).