| Literature DB >> 31817965 |
Evgeny Tretyakov1,2, Pavel Fedyushin1, Elena Panteleeva1,2, Larisa Gurskaya1, Tatyana Rybalova1,2, Artem Bogomyakov2,3, Elena Zaytseva1,2, Maxim Kazantsev1, Inna Shundrina1,2, Victor Ovcharenko3.
Abstract
The interaction of octafluorotoluene (1a), as well as pentafluorobenzonitrile (1b) with tert-butylamine, followed by the oxidation of thus formed tert-butylanilines (2a,b) with meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid led to functionalized perfluorinated phenyl tert-butyl nitroxides [namely, 4-(N-tert-butyl(oxyl)amino)heptafluorotoluene (3a) and 4-(N-tert-butyl(oxyl)amino)tetrafluorobenzonitrile (3b)] with nearly quantitative total yields. The molecular and crystal structures of nitroxide 3a were proved by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The radical nature of both nitroxides was confirmed by ESR data. The interaction of Cu(hfac)2 with the obtained nitroxides 3a,b gave corresponding trans-bis(1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoropentane-2,4-dionato-κ2O,O')bis{4-(N-tert-butyl(oxyl)amino)perfluoroarene-κO}copper (II) complexes ([Cu(hfac)2(3a)2] and [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2]). X-ray crystal structure analysis showed square bipyramid coordination of a centrally symmetric Cu polyhedron with the axial positions occupied by oxygen atoms of the nitroxide groups. Magnetic measurements revealed intramolecular ferromagnetic exchange interactions between unpaired electrons of Cu(II) ions and paramagnetic ligands, with exchange interaction parameters JCu-R reaching 53 cm-1.Entities:
Keywords: aromatic nucleophilic substitution; copper-nitroxide complexes; fluoroarenes; magneto-structural correlations; nitroxides; tert-butylanilines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817965 PMCID: PMC6943699 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthetic approaches to phenyl tert-butyl nitroxides.
Scheme 2Synthesis of fluorinated nitroxides 3a,b.
Figure 1Experimental (black curve) and simulated (red curve) ESR spectra of 3a: (a) the whole spectrum, and (b) only the central component.
Half-wave potentials for the studied compounds.
| Compound | E1/2ox, V | E1/2Red, V |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 | −1.44 | |
| 1.00 | −1.14 | |
| [Cu(hfac)2( | 1.04 | −1.40 |
| [Cu(hfac)2( | 1.06 | −1.20 |
| 0.38 | −1.63 | |
| 0.53 | −1.37 |
* Data obtained in a CH2Cl2/0.1 M n-Bu4NPF6 solution at 298 K vs. Fc/Fc+. ** Data obtained in a MeCN/0.1 M n-Bu4NBF4 solution [33].
XRD data on radical 3a and complexes [Cu(hfac)2(3a)2] and [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2].
| Compound | 3a | [Cu(hfac)2(3a)2] | [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C11H9F7NO | C32H20CuF26N2O6 | C32H20CuF20N4O6 |
| Formula weight | 304.19 | 1086.04 | 1000.06 |
| Crystal system | Orthorhombic | Triclinic | Monoclinic |
| Space group | Pbca | P-1 | P |
| 11.6131(7) | 10.0680(3) | 11.3678(8) | |
|
| 10.9047(7) | 13.8773(5) | 8.6913(7) |
|
| 19.7695(12) | 16.1651(6) | 20.219(1) |
| 90.00 | 96.289(2) | 90.00 | |
| 90.00 | 102.367(2) | 90.158(3) | |
| 90.00 | 104.872(2) | 90.00 | |
| Volume, Å3 | 2503.6(3) | 2099.6(1) | 1997.6(2) |
| Z | 8 | 2 | 2 |
| Density (calcd.), mg·m−3 | 1.614 | 1.718 | 1.663 |
| Abs. coefficient, mm−1 | 0.174 | 0.680 | 0.687 |
| F(000) | 1224 | 1074 | 994 |
| Crystal size, mm3 | 0.40 × 0.70 × 1.00 | 0.30 × 0.40 × 0.50 | 0.10 × 0.12 × 0.80 |
| Θ range for data collection, ° | 2.76–26.07 | 1.31–26.43 | 1.79–25.05 |
| Index ranges | −14 ≤ h ≤ 14, | −12 ≤ h ≤ 12, | −13 ≤ h ≤ 13, |
| Reflections collected | 34,642 | 64,762 | 26,173 |
| Independent reflections | 2473 R(int) 0.0266 | 8633 R(int) 0.052 | 3530 R(int) 0.069 |
| Completeness to θ 50º, % | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 2473/0/184 | 8633/0/613 | 3530/48/376 |
| Goodness-of-fit on | 1.044 | 1.007 | 1.03 |
| Reflections with | 2057 | 5535 | 2587 |
| Final R indices at | |||
| Final R indices (all data) | |||
| Largest diff. peak/hole, e·Å−3 | 0.59/−0.27 | 0.73/−0.47 | 0.58/−0.38 |
Figure 2Molecular structure (a) and a fragment of the crystal structure (b) of nitroxide 3a (the thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level).
Scheme 3Complexation of Cu(hfac)2 with nitroxides 3a,b.
Figure 3XRD structures of [Cu(hfac)2(3a)2], one of two independent molecules (a), and [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2] with omitted minor positions of CF3 and tert-butyl groups (b).
Selected geometrical parameters of complexes [Cu(hfac)2(3a)2] and [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2].
| Parameter | [Cu(hfac)2(3a)2] 1 | [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bond Lengths, Å | |||
| Cu1–O1 | 2.411(5) | 2.398(4) | 2.452(4) |
| Cu1–O2 | 1.942(3) | 1.946(3) | 1.944(2) |
| Cu1–O3 | 1.935(3) | 1.935(3) | 1.937(2) |
| Bond angles, ° | |||
| O1–Cu1–O2 | 89.0(1) | 88.1(1) | 86.6(1) |
| O1–Cu1–O3 | 84.1(1) | 82.3(1) | 83.9(1) |
| O2–Cu1–O3 | 92.4(1) | 92.4(1) | 92.7(1) |
1 For two independent moieties.
Figure 4XRD structure of [Cu(hfac)2(2b)2].
Figure 5The µeff(T) dependences for complexes [Cu(hfac)2(3a)2] (a) and [Cu(hfac)2(3b)2] (b). Solid lines are theoretical curves.