Literature DB >> 33227427

Anti-toxin antibody is not associated with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Julie Gilbert1, Jhansi Leslie2, Rose Putler2, Shayna Weiner3, Alexandra Standke3, Aline Penkevich3, Micah Keidan3, Vincent B Young4, Krishna Rao5.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurs in ∼20% of patients. Prior studies indicated that antibody responses directed against the C. difficile toxins A and B were potentially associated with lower risk of recurrent CDI. Here we tested the hypothesis that circulating anti-toxin IgG antibody levels associate with reduced risk of recurrent CDI. A cohort study with prospective enrollment and retrospective data abstraction examined antibody levels in 275 adult patients at the University of Michigan with CDI. We developed an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay to detect IgG antibodies against toxin A and toxin B in sera obtained at the time of diagnosis. Logistic regression examined the relationship between antibody levels and recurrence, and sensitivity tests evaluated for follow-up and survivor biases, history of CDI, and PCR ribotype. Follow-up data were available for 174 subjects, of whom 36 (20.7%) had recurrence. Comparing antibody levels vs. recurrence and CDI history, anti-toxin A levels were similar, while anti-toxin B levels had a greater range of values. In unadjusted analysis, detection of anti-toxin A antibodies, but not anti-toxin B antibodies, associated with an increased risk of recurrence (OR 2.71 [1.06, 8.37], P = .053). Adjusting for confounders weakened this association. The results were the same in sensitivity analyses. We observed a borderline increased risk of recurrence in patients positive for anti-toxin A antibodies, and sensitivity analyses showed this was not simply a reflection of prior exposure status. Future studies are needed to assess how neutralizing antibody or levels after treatment associate with recurrence.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibodies; Bacterial toxins; Clostridium difficile; Healthcare-associated infections

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33227427      PMCID: PMC8094835          DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever.

Authors:  Ciarán P Kelly; J Thomas LaMont
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Clostridium difficile ribotype 027: relationship to age, detectability of toxins A or B in stool with rapid testing, severe infection, and mortality.

Authors:  Krishna Rao; Dejan Micic; Mukil Natarajan; Spencer Winters; Mark J Kiel; Seth T Walk; Kavitha Santhosh; Jill A Mogle; Andrzej T Galecki; William LeBar; Peter D R Higgins; Vincent B Young; David M Aronoff
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Risk of Subsequent Sepsis Within 90 Days After a Hospital Stay by Type of Antibiotic Exposure.

Authors:  James Baggs; John A Jernigan; Alison Laufer Halpin; Lauren Epstein; Kelly M Hatfield; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  An ELISA method for detection of human antibodies to an immunotoxin.

Authors:  Doris M Benbrook
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 5.  Bezlotoxumab.

Authors:  Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile and serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A.

Authors:  L Kyne; M Warny; A Qamar; C P Kelly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Mark H Wilcox; Dale N Gerding; Ian R Poxton; Ciaran Kelly; Richard Nathan; Thomas Birch; Oliver A Cornely; Galia Rahav; Emilio Bouza; Christine Lee; Grant Jenkin; Werner Jensen; You-Sun Kim; Junichi Yoshida; Lori Gabryelski; Alison Pedley; Karen Eves; Robert Tipping; Dalya Guris; Nicholas Kartsonis; Mary-Beth Dorr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Fecal microbiota transplant for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Colleen R Kelly; Chioma Ihunnah; Monika Fischer; Alexander Khoruts; Christina Surawicz; Anita Afzali; Olga Aroniadis; Amy Barto; Thomas Borody; Andrea Giovanelli; Shelley Gordon; Michael Gluck; Elizabeth L Hohmann; Dina Kao; John Y Kao; Daniel P McQuillen; Mark Mellow; Kevin M Rank; Krishna Rao; Arnab Ray; Margot A Schwartz; Namita Singh; Neil Stollman; David L Suskind; Stephen M Vindigni; Ilan Youngster; Lawrence Brandt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  A mathematical model to evaluate the routine use of fecal microbiota transplantation to prevent incident and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Eric T Lofgren; Rebekah W Moehring; Deverick J Anderson; David J Weber; Nina H Fefferman
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 10.  Risk factors for recurrence, complications and mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire Nour Abou Chakra; Jacques Pepin; Stephanie Sirard; Louis Valiquette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antigen-Specific vs. Neutralizing Antibodies Against Conditioned Media of Patients With Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Prospective Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Sophie Roth; Philipp Jung; James Boone; Alexander Mellmann; Anna Nimmesgern; Sören L Becker; Fabian K Berger; Lutz von Müller
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.