Literature DB >> 33224823

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound area ratio in identifying benign and malignant small breast masses.

Wei Wang1, Yan Zheng1, Xiao-Feng Wu1, Dan Zhao1, Li-Zhu Hou1, Fei Shi1, Jin-Jin Liu1, Feng-Lin Dong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor size affects clinical staging and is closely related to prognosis. Therefore, early diagnosis of breast cancer is one of the most important methods to reduce mortality and improve prognosis. However, minimal breast cancer is difficult to differentiate from small benign breast masses due to insufficient typical malignant signs. The significantly increased range of enhancement can be an important indication for the prediction of malignancy; however, quantitative studies on the extent of enhancement are rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) area ratio in finding benign and malignant small breast masses.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 patients with breast masses confirmed by surgery or needle biopsy (the maximal diameter not over 1 cm). 88 breast masses were divided into the younger age group (not over 40 years old) and older age group (over 40 years old) according to the patient's age. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cutoff values of CEUS area ratio in diagnosing benign or malignant small breast masses in each group. The efficiency of different cutoff values in finding benign and malignant small breast masses of the distinct groups was analyzed.
RESULTS: The CEUS area ratio of malignant mass was larger than benign masses (P<0.05). The CEUS area ratio of malignant masses in the younger age group was larger than that in the older age group (P<0.05). The results of the ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) and the cutoff values of the entire group, the younger age group, and the older age group were 0.887, 1.65; 0.909, 1.95; and 0.908, 1.22, respectively. When the cutoff value of the older age group was reduced from 1.65 to 1.22, its diagnostic sensitivity was improved significantly (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: CEUS area ratio has specific application value in finding benign and malignant small breast masses. Proper reduction of the cutoff value of elderly patients can further improve its diagnostic sensitivity without significantly reducing the specificity. 2020 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal breast mass; area ratio; contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)

Year:  2020        PMID: 33224823      PMCID: PMC7667067          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  19 in total

1.  Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  YongMei Wang; Wei Fan; Song Zhao; Kai Zhang; Li Zhang; Ping Zhang; Rong Ma
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1-cm breast lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.

Authors:  He Liu; Yuxin Jiang; Qing Dai; Qingli Zhu; Liang Wang; Jing Zhang; Qian Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Qiongchao Jiang; Huan Wu; Xiaofeng Guan; Wei Qin; Baoming Luo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Perfusion heterogeneity in breast tumors for assessment of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Ying-Jia Li; Ge Wen; Ying Wang; Dong-Xiao Wang; Li Yang; Yong-Jian Deng; Hong-Qin Wei; Jie He; Xia Zhang; Ying-Shi Gu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  A review of global cancer burden: trends, challenges, strategies, and a role for surgeons.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Shireen Rajaram; Madhuri Are; Hemanth Raj; Benjamin O Anderson; Ramesh Chaluvarya Swamy; Manavalan Vijayakumar; Tianqiang Song; Manoj Pandey; James A Edney; Eduardo L Cazap
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  New potential and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Own investigations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; Paule Opolon; Marie Christine Mathieu; Alexandra Athanasiou; Jean Rémi Garbay; Suzette Delaloge; Clarisse Dromain
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.

Authors:  Hongjia Zhao; Rong Xu; Qiufang Ouyang; Lidian Chen; Baowei Dong; Ye Huihua
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Breast cancer features in women under the age of 40 years.

Authors:  Deise Santiago Girão Eugênio; Juliana A Souza; Rubens Chojniak; Almir G V Bitencourt; Luciana Graziano; Elvira F Souza
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.209

9.  Breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound: is a scoring system feasible? A preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Bing Ou; Haiyun Yang; Huan Wu; Baoming Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.