| Literature DB >> 33224137 |
Fernanda Cristofori1, Ruggiero Francavilla1, Daniela Capobianco2, Vanessa Nadia Dargenio1, Simone Filardo2, Paola Mastromarino2.
Abstract
Gluten is a mixture of proteins highly resistant to hydrolysis, resulting in the emergence of toxic peptides responsible for gluten-related disorders. Currently, a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the unique proven therapy for celiac disease (CD). Several research groups and pharmaceutical companies are developing new nondietetic therapeutic strategies for CD. Probiotics are viable microorganisms thought to have a healthy effect on the host. The proteolytic mechanism of lactic acid bacteria comprises an extracellular serine protease, di- and oligopeptide-specific transport systems, and several intracellular peptidases that might affect gluten degradation. Therefore, probiotic supplementation is an attractive therapy because of its possible anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Several studies have been performed to assess the effectiveness of various specific probiotic strains, showing positive effects on immune-modulation (inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α) restoring gut microbiota and decrease of immunogenic peptides. The present review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the ability of probiotic strain (single or mixtures) to digest gliadin peptides in vitro and to modulate the inflammatory response in the gut.Entities:
Keywords: celiac disease; gluten digestion; gluten hydrolysis; microbiota; probiotics
Year: 2020 PMID: 33224137 PMCID: PMC7669986 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.567801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
In vitro and in vivo studies on lactobacilli and bifidobacteria strains capable of hydrolyzing gluten proteins reducing their toxicity and/or inflammatory effect.
| Microorganism | Identified enzymes | Hydrolysis effect | Biological effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixture of | Iminopeptidase, dipeptidyl-peptidase, prolylendopeptidase, prolidase, prolinase, aminopeptidase P | Complete hydrolysis of α2-gliadin-derived epitopes 62–75 and 33-mer | No alteration of intestinal permeability after ingestion of bread produced with wheat flour fermented with lactobacilli in CD patients on a GDF | Di Cagno et al. ( |
| Mixture of | Proline iminopeptidase, aminopeptidase N and A, dipeptidase, prolinase, prolidase, dipeptidyl peptidase, tripeptidase, prolylendopeptidase endopeptidase | Complete hydrolysis of α2-gliadin-derived epitopes 62–75 and 33-mer | Reduced alteration of gliadin-induced increase of intestinal cell cultures permeability | De Angelis et al. ( |
| Mixture of | Aminopeptidase N, iminopeptidase, prolyl endopeptidyl peptidase, tripeptidase, prolidase, prolinase, dipeptidase | Complete hydrolysis of α9-gliadin peptide 57-68, 33-mer, A-gliadin peptide 62-75, γ-gliadin peptide 62-75 | Reduction to basal level of IL-2, IL-10, and IFN-γ increase induced by untreated wheat bread gluten in duodenal biopsy specimens from CD patients | Francavilla et al. ( |
| Mixture of | – | Hydrolysis of gliadin peptides generated by digestive proteases into smaller fragments. | Inhibition of the inflammatory state and disruption of tight junctions induced by gliadin in intestinal epithelial cells. | Giorgi et al. ( |
|
| – | Different peptide patterns with lower molecular mass compared to those noninoculated with bacteria | Reduction of the cytotoxic effect and inhibition of NF-kB activation and TNF-α production induced by gliadin in intestinal epithelial cells especially by | Laparra et al. ( |
|
| – | Hydrolysis of gluten in different peptide patterns | Reduction of the cytotoxic effect and inhibition of NF-kB activation and TNF-α production induced by gluten in intestinal epithelial cells especially by | Castilho de Almeida et al. ( |
Figure 1α-gliadin structure and toxic epitopes (33-mer and p31-43). A, B, C represent the peptides hydrolyzed by a different mixture of probiotic strains. (A) Hydrolyzed by a mixture of L. paracasei, L. plantarum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, B. breve Bbr8, B. breve BL10 (18). (A, B) Hydrolyzed by a mixture of L. alimentarius, L. brevis, L. sanfranciscensis, L. hilgardii (15); mixture of Streptococcus thermophilus, L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium breve, B. infantis, B. longum (16). (A–C) Hydrolyzed by a mixture of L. casei, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, L. paracasei LPC01 and BGP2, L. plantarum BGP12, LP27, LP35, LP40, LP47, and SP1 (17).