BACKGROUND: Prophylactic mastectomy is an effective approach to breast cancer risk reduction in patients at high risk. Further studies using standardized measures for quality of life are needed to better understand the effect of prophylactic mastectomy on individual patients and, thereby, allow for better patient counseling and selection. METHODS: In this prospective study patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy were asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire before and 1 year after surgery. All patients underwent bilateral mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction. Patient- and surgery-related information was collected in a database. RESULTS: In total, 48 patients underwent bilateral skin-sparing mastectomy. Of these, 29 (60.4%) suffered from breast cancer. A 2-stage reconstruction with intermediate expander implantation was conducted in 19 (39.6%) patients. All patients completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The domain "psychosocial well-being" was significantly improved from a mean score of 74.98 preoperatively to a postoperative score of 81.56 (p = 0.021). In contrast, the domain "physical well-being" dropped -8.38 points on average to a postoperative score of 74.96 (p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients with the lowest preoperative score in the domain "satisfaction with breast" showed the greatest increase after surgery (50.31 vs. 67.25, p < 0.001). On the contrary, patients with the highest preoperative values experienced the strongest decrease in satisfaction (91.60 vs. 75.27, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Implant-based prophylactic mastectomy leads to good quality-of-life results in patients at high risk for breast cancer. Especially, patients with a low preoperative satisfaction with their breasts have a significantly higher chance of experiencing substantial improvements in their quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic mastectomy is an effective approach to breast cancer risk reduction in patients at high risk. Further studies using standardized measures for quality of life are needed to better understand the effect of prophylactic mastectomy on individual patients and, thereby, allow for better patient counseling and selection. METHODS: In this prospective study patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy were asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire before and 1 year after surgery. All patients underwent bilateral mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction. Patient- and surgery-related information was collected in a database. RESULTS: In total, 48 patients underwent bilateral skin-sparing mastectomy. Of these, 29 (60.4%) suffered from breast cancer. A 2-stage reconstruction with intermediate expander implantation was conducted in 19 (39.6%) patients. All patients completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The domain "psychosocial well-being" was significantly improved from a mean score of 74.98 preoperatively to a postoperative score of 81.56 (p = 0.021). In contrast, the domain "physical well-being" dropped -8.38 points on average to a postoperative score of 74.96 (p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients with the lowest preoperative score in the domain "satisfaction with breast" showed the greatest increase after surgery (50.31 vs. 67.25, p < 0.001). On the contrary, patients with the highest preoperative values experienced the strongest decrease in satisfaction (91.60 vs. 75.27, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Implant-based prophylactic mastectomy leads to good quality-of-life results in patients at high risk for breast cancer. Especially, patients with a low preoperative satisfaction with their breasts have a significantly higher chance of experiencing substantial improvements in their quality of life.
Authors: Ann M Geiger; Carmen N West; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lisa J Herrinton; In-Liu A Liu; Andrea Altschuler; Sharon J Rolnick; Emily L Harris; Sarah M Greene; Joann G Elmore; Karen M Emmons; Suzanne W Fletcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Colleen M McCarthy; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: D Casella; G Di Taranto; M Marcasciano; S Sordi; A Kothari; T Kovacs; F Lo Torto; E Cigna; D Ribuffo; C Calabrese Journal: Breast Date: 2018-02-18 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Amie M Scott; Jennifer A Klok; Peter G Cordeiro; Stefan J Cano Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Andrea Altschuler; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Sharon J Rolnick; Sarah M Greene; Joann G Elmore; Carmen N West; Lisa J Herrinton; Emily L Harris; Suzanne W Fletcher; Karen M Emmons; Ann M Geiger Journal: Breast J Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: G Llort; I Chirivella; R Morales; R Serrano; A Beatriz Sanchez; A Teulé; E Lastra; J Brunet; J Balmaña; B Graña Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 3.405