Literature DB >> 29455110

Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop® Bra mesh in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

D Casella1, G Di Taranto2, M Marcasciano3, S Sordi4, A Kothari5, T Kovacs5, F Lo Torto6, E Cigna7, D Ribuffo6, C Calabrese8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although demand for prophylactic mastectomy is increasing over time among women at a high risk for breast cancer, there is a paucity of studies on long term patient-reported outcomes after this procedure.
METHODS: Between January 2011 and January 2015, 46 patients documented BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, eligible for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate breast prosthetic reconstruction were registered at our Institution. Patients underwent NSM and subcutaneous reconstruction with implant covered by a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop®). The BREAST-Q questionnaire was given to patients prior to surgery and at 1 and 2 years follow-up points. Capsular contracture was evaluated by Baker scale. Surgical outcomes along with the changes in BREAST-Q score were analyzed over time.
RESULTS: Complications were reported in only one case and after two years the capsular contracture rates were acceptable (grade I: 65,2%; grade II: 32,6%; grade III 2,2%). At one year and two year follow-ups patients reported high rates in the measures of overall satisfaction with breasts (72,5 and 73,7 respectively), psychosocial well-being (78,4 and 78,6), sexual well-being (58,8 and 59,4), physical well-being (77,6 and 80,6) and overall satisfaction with outcome (75,7 and 79,7). A statistically significant increase in all BREAST-domains from the preoperative to the postoperative period was reported at one and two years follow-ups (p < 0,05).
CONCLUSION: Following bilateral prophylactic NSM and immediate subcutaneous reconstruction with TiLoop®, patients demonstrated high levels of satisfaction and quality of life as measured by BREAST-Q. 2-years outcomes confirmed high patient comfort with increased scores from the preoperative baseline level.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA mutation; Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM); Prophylactic mastectomy; Subcutaneous breast reconstruction; TiLoop

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29455110     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  9 in total

1.  Quality of Life after Bilateral and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rüdiger Klapdor; Christina Weiß; Elna Kuehnle; Fabian Kohls; Julia von Ehr; Anja Philippeit; Ursula Hille-Betz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The PreQ-20 TRIAL: A prospective cohort study of the oncologic safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Benigno Acea-Nebril; Alejandra García-Novoa; Lourdes García Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Extended Latissimus Dorsi Kite Flap (ELD-K Flap): Revisiting an Old Place for a Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Medium to Large Breasts.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Jacopo Nanni; Federico Lo Torto; Leonardo Barellini; Ugo Redi; Juste Kaciulyte; Dario Cassetti; Diego Ribuffo; Marco Marcasciano
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Influence of Incision Site on Postoperative Outcome in Skin-/Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Is There a Difference between Radial and Inframammary Incision?

Authors:  Monika Lanthaler; Rossella Spinelli; Christoph Tasch; Michael Sieb; Manuel Harfmann; Agnese Nitto; Gerhard Pierer; Thomas Bauer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gauthier Rathat; Christian Herlin; Christophe Bonnel; Guillaume Captier; Martha Duraes
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 6.  Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ishith Seth; Nimish Seth; Gabriella Bulloch; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis Update.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Maurice Y Nahabedian; Allen Gabriel; Michael Sporck; Mousam Parekh; David Macarios; Jason Hammer; Steven Sigalove
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-10-26

8.  Upper limb rehabilitation system based on virtual reality for breast cancer patients: Development and usability study.

Authors:  Zijun Zhou; Jiaxin Li; He Wang; Ze Luan; Yuan Li; Xin Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early Clinical Outcomes of Polydioxanone Mesh for Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cecil S Qiu; Akhil K Seth
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.