Literature DB >> 33223573

A Mathematical Model for the Release, Transport, and Retention of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Vadose Zone.

Bo Guo1, Jicai Zeng1, Mark L Brusseau1,2.   

Abstract

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are emerging contaminants of critical concern. As surfactants, PFAS tend to accumulate at air-water interfaces and may stay in the vadose zone for long times before contaminating groundwater. Yet not well understood, the extent of retention in the vadose zone has critical implications for risk management and remediation strategies. We present the first mathematical model that accounts for surfactant-induced flow and solid-phase and air-water interfacial adsorption. We apply the model to simulate PFOS (a PFAS compound of primary concern) transport in the vadose zone at a model fire-training area site impacted by Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF). Air-water interfacial adsorption is shown to have a significant impact-amplified by the low water content due to gravity drainage-total retardation factors range from 233 to 1355 for the sand and 146 to 792 for the soil used in the study. The simulations illustrate it can take several decades or longer for PFOS to reach groundwater. Counterintuitively, the lower water content in the sand-due to stronger drainage and weaker capillary retention-leads to retardation factors greater than for the soil. Also, most PFOS is adsorbed at air-water interfaces with only 1-2% in the aqueous phase. The implications include 1) fine-texture materials could have lower retardation factors than sand due to higher retained water content, 2) soil PFAS concentrations are likely to be orders of magnitude higher than those in groundwater at source zones. Both implications are consistent with recent field observations at hundreds of AFFF-impacted sites.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33223573      PMCID: PMC7673302          DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Resour Res        ISSN: 0043-1397            Impact factor:   5.240


  29 in total

1.  Adsorption of ionic surfactants at an expanding air-water interface.

Authors:  Dimitrina S Valkovska; Gemma C Shearman; Colin D Bain; Richard C Darton; Julian Eastoe
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 3.882

2.  The influence of surfactant and solution composition on PFAS adsorption at fluid-fluid interfaces.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Sarah Van Glubt
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Nonideal Transport and Extended Elution Tailing of PFOS in Soil.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Naima Khan; Yake Wang; Ni Yan; Sarah Van Glubt; Kenneth C Carroll
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Evaluating air-water and NAPL-water interfacial adsorption and retention of Perfluorocarboxylic acids within the Vadose zone.

Authors:  Jeff A K Silva; William A Martin; Jared L Johnson; John E McCray
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Persistence of perfluoroalkyl acid precursors in AFFF-impacted groundwater and soil.

Authors:  Erika F Houtz; Christopher P Higgins; Jennifer A Field; David L Sedlak
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Sorption of perfluorinated surfactants on sediments.

Authors:  Christopher P Higgins; Richard G Luthy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in soils and groundwater of a U.S. metropolitan area: migration and implications for human exposure.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Matt F Simcik; Thomas R Halbach; John S Gulliver
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  A Never-Ending Story of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)?

Authors:  Zhanyun Wang; Jamie C DeWitt; Christopher P Higgins; Ian T Cousins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Comprehensive retention model for PFAS transport in subsurface systems.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Ni Yan; Sarah Van Glubt; Yake Wang; Wei Chen; Ying Lyu; Barry Dungan; Kenneth C Carroll; F Omar Holguin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  The influence of molecular structure on the adsorption of PFAS to fluid-fluid interfaces: Using QSPR to predict interfacial adsorption coefficients.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  11 in total

1.  Air-water interfacial areas relevant for transport of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  The impact of multiple-component PFAS solutions on fluid-fluid interfacial adsorption and transport of PFOS in unsaturated porous media.

Authors:  Dandan Huang; Hassan Saleem; Bo Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Limitations of Current Approaches for Predicting Groundwater Vulnerability from PFAS Contamination in the Vadose Zone.

Authors:  Matt Rovero; Diana Cutt; Rachel Griffiths; Urszula Filipowicz; Katherine Mishkin; Brad White; Sandra Goodrow; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.870

4.  Contribution of Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids to the Retention and Transport of Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Porous Media.

Authors:  Sarah Van Glubt; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  The influence of molecular structure on PFAS adsorption at air-water interfaces in electrolyte solutions.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Sarah Van Glubt
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.943

6.  Field-Scale Demonstration of PFAS Leachability Following In Situ Soil Stabilization.

Authors:  Jeffrey T McDonough; Richard H Anderson; Johnsie R Lang; David Liles; Kasey Matteson; Theresa Olechiw
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-27

7.  Examining the robustness and concentration dependency of PFAS air-water and NAPL-water interfacial adsorption coefficients.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Impact of a Hydrocarbon Surfactant on the Retention and Transport of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Saturated and Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Yifan Ji; Ni Yan; Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Xilai Zheng; Mengfan Dai; Hejie Liu; Xin Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 11.357

9.  Ideal versus Nonideal Transport of PFAS in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Dandan Huang; Ni Yan; Ying Lyu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 10.  Environmental Sources, Chemistry, Fate, and Transport of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: State of the Science, Key Knowledge Gaps, and Recommendations Presented at the August 2019 SETAC Focus Topic Meeting.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guelfo; Stephen Korzeniowski; Marc A Mills; Janet Anderson; Richard H Anderson; Jennifer A Arblaster; Jason M Conder; Ian T Cousins; Kavitha Dasu; Barbara J Henry; Linda S Lee; Jinxia Liu; Erica R McKenzie; Janice Willey
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.218

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.