Literature DB >> 33223363

Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Modality Among Newly Age-Eligible Medicaid Enrollees.

Cynthia M Mojica1, Bonnie Lind2, Yifan Gu2, Gloria D Coronado3, Melinda M Davis4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study examines individual- and practice-level predictors of screening modality among 1,484 Medicaid enrollees who initiated colorectal cancer screening (fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood tests or colonoscopy) within a year of turning age 50 years. Understanding screening modality patterns for patients and health systems can help optimize colorectal cancer screening initiatives that will lead to high screening completion rates.
METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression was conducted in 2019 to analyze Medicaid claims data (January 2013-June 2015) to explore predictors of colonoscopy screening (versus fecal testing).
RESULTS: Overall, 64% of enrollees received a colonoscopy and 36% received a fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Male (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.08, 1.37) compared with female enrollees and those with 4-6 (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.15, 2.15), 7-10 (OR=2.23, 95% CI=1.64, 3.03), and ≥11 (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.22, 2.65) primary care visits compared with 0-3 visits had higher odds of colonoscopy screening. Non-White, non-Hispanic enrollees (OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.58, 0.87) compared with White, non-Hispanics Whites had lower odds of colonoscopy screening. Practices with an endoscopy facility within their ZIP code (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.08, 2.08) compared with practices without a nearby endoscopy facility had higher odds of colonoscopy screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Among newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees who received colorectal cancer screening, non-White, non-Hispanic individuals were less likely and male enrollees and those with ≥4 primary care visits were more likely to undergo colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy also was the more common modality among adults whose primary care clinic had an endoscopy facility in the same ZIP code. Future research is needed to fully understand patient, provider, and practice preferences regarding screening modality.
Copyright © 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33223363      PMCID: PMC8493888          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  42 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Initiation After Age 50 Years in an Organized Program.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Wei Zhao; Michael Goodman; Ahmedin Jemal; Kevin C Ward; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries' health outcomes.

Authors:  Chiang-Hua Chang; Therese A Stukel; Ann Barry Flood; David C Goodman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Using Outreach to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; David P Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Thuy Le; Erin Keast; Jennifer Rivelli; Keshia Bigler; Beverly Green; William M Vollmer; Gloria Coronado
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-02

5.  Oregon's Medicaid Transformation: An Innovative Approach To Holding A Health System Accountable For Spending Growth.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah J Cohen; Neal Wallace; Michael E Chernew; Glenn Kautz; Dennis McCarty; Bentson McFarland; Bill Wright; Jeanene Smith
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-09

6.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Sandeep Vijan; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Jennifer P Thomas; Yunghui V Lin; Roxana Muñoz; Chim Lau; Ma Somsouk; Najwa El-Nachef; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-09

7.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2020-05-13

8.  Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States.

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Amanda F Petrik; William M Vollmer; Stephen H Taplin; Erin M Keast; Scott Fields; Beverly B Green
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald E Myers; Lawrence Paszat; Mardie Serenity; Daniel F Perez; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of cumulative colorectal cancer screening delays: A simulation study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; John M Inadomi; Christopher E Maerzluft
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.687

2.  An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Cynthia M Mojica; Rose Gunn; Robyn Pham; Edward J Miech; Ann Romer; Stephanie Renfro; Khaya D Clark; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.