Literature DB >> 33221989

Inter-muscle differences in modulation of motor evoked potentials and posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked from lower-limb muscles during agonist and antagonist muscle contractions.

Akira Saito1,2,3, Kento Nakagawa4, Yohei Masugi5,6, Kimitaka Nakazawa5.   

Abstract

Voluntary contraction facilitates corticospinal and spinal reflex circuit excitabilities of the contracted muscle and inhibits spinal reflex circuit excitability of the antagonist. It has been suggested that modulation of spinal reflex circuit excitability in agonist and antagonist muscles during voluntary contraction differs among lower-limb muscles. However, whether the effects of voluntary contraction on the excitabilities of corticospinal and spinal reflex circuits depend on the tested muscles remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine inter-muscle differences in modulation of the corticospinal and spinal reflex circuit excitabilities of multiple lower-limb muscles during voluntary contraction. Eleven young males performed isometric plantar-flexion, dorsi-flexion, knee extension, and flexion at low torque levels. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and posterior root-muscle reflexes from seven lower-leg and thigh muscles were evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, respectively, at rest and during weak voluntary contractions. MEP and posterior root-muscle reflex amplitudes of agonists were significantly increased as agonist torque level increased, except for the reflex of the tibialis anterior. MEP amplitudes of antagonists were significantly increased in relation to the agonist torque level, but those of the rectus femoris were slightly depressed during knee flexion. Regarding the posterior root-muscle reflex of the antagonists, the amplitudes of triceps surae and the hamstrings were significantly decreased, but those of the quadriceps femoris were significantly increased as the agonist torque level increased. These results demonstrate that modulation of corticospinal and spinal reflex circuit excitabilities during agonist and antagonist muscle contractions differed among lower-limb muscles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticospinal excitability; Electromyography; Posterior root-muscle reflex; Quadriceps femoris; Spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221989      PMCID: PMC7936942          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05973-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Corrado Cescon; Roberto Merletti
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Specific modulation of corticospinal and spinal excitabilities during maximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions in synergist muscles.

Authors:  Julien Duclay; Benjamin Pasquet; Alain Martin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Post-activation depression in the human soleus muscle using peripheral nerve and transcutaneous spinal stimulation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Andrews; Richard B Stein; François D Roy
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Reliability of H-reflex in vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles during passive and active isometric conditions.

Authors:  Valentin Doguet; Marc Jubeau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Unique activation of the quadriceps femoris during single- and multi-joint exercises.

Authors:  Ryoichi Ema; Masanori Sakaguchi; Ryota Akagi; Yasuo Kawakami
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  A Abdelmoula; S Baudry; J Duchateau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans.

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Susan J Harkema; Christine J Dy; Yuri P Gerasimenko; Poul Dyhre-Poulsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Josef Ladenbauer; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.094

9.  An allometric analysis of the number of muscle spindles in mammalian skeletal muscles.

Authors:  R W Banks
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Body Position Influences Which Neural Structures Are Recruited by Lumbar Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Matthias Krenn; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Andrea Toth; Winfried Mayr; Karen Minassian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of Spine Curvature on the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Lumbar Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Veronika E Binder; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Anna Rienmüller; Zoltán Száva; Matthias J Krenn; Karen Minassian; Simon M Danner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Intra-limb modulations of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked from the lower-limb muscles during isometric voluntary contractions.

Authors:  Akira Saito; Kento Nakagawa; Yohei Masugi; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.