Literature DB >> 33221151

Clinicopathological correlation of radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size and tumor volume for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Dongguang Wei1, Mohamed M Zaid2, Matthew H Katz3, Laura R Prakash3, Michael Kim3, Ching-Wei D Tzeng3, Jeffrey E Lee3, Anshuman Agrawal2, Asif Rashid1, Hua Wang4, Gauri Varadhachary4, Robert A Wolff4, Eric P Tamm5, Priya R Bhosale5, Anirban Maitra6, Eugene J Koay7, Huamin Wang8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tumor size measurement is critical for accurate tumor staging in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, accurate tumor size measurement is challenging in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before resection, due to treatment-induced fibrosis and tumor invasion beyond the grossly identified tumor area. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between the tumor size and tumor volume measured on post-therapy computed tomography (CT) scans and the pathological measurement. Also, we investigated the correlation between these measurements and clinicopathological parameters and survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we evaluated 343 patients with PDAC who received neoadjuvant therapy, followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy and had pre-operative pancreatic protocol CT imaging. We measured the longest tumor diameter (RadL) and the radiological tumor volume (RadV) on the post-therapy CT scan, then we categorized RadL into four radiologic tumor stages (RTS) based on the current AJCC staging (8th edition) protocol and RadV based on the median. Pearson correlation or Spearman's coefficient (δ), T-test and ANOVA was used to test the correlation between the radiological and pathological measurement. Chi-square analysis was used to test the correlation with the tumor pathological response, lymph-node metastasis and margin status and Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard for survival analysis. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: As a continuous variable, RadL showed a positive linear correlation with the post-therapy pathologic tumor size in the overall patient population (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.72, P < 0.001) and RadV (δ: 0.63, p < 0.0001). However, there was no correlation between RadL and pathologic tumor size in patients with ypT0 and those with pathologic tumor size of ≤1.0 cm. Post-therapy RTS and RadV group correlated with ypT stage, tumor response grades using either CAP or MDA grading system, distance of superior mesenteric artery margin and tumor recurrence/metastasis.
CONCLUSION: Although RadL tends to understage ypT in PDAC patients who had no radiologically detectable tumor or small tumors (RTS0 or RTS1), radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size may be used as a marker for the pathologic tumor staging and tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Copyright © 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic cancer; Radiologic tumor size; Radiologic tumor volume; Tumor response grade; Tumor stage

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221151      PMCID: PMC7855532          DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  27 in total

1.  Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Huamin Wang; Aparna Balachandran; Priya Bhosale; Christopher H Crane; Xuemei Wang; Peter W T Pisters; Jeffrey E Lee; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Robert Wolff; James Abbruzzese; Gauri Varadhachary; Xavier Chopin-Laly; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging.

Authors:  Susanna I Lee; Mostafa Atri
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Nationwide trends and outcomes associated with neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: An analysis of 18 243 patients.

Authors:  Linda M Youngwirth; Daniel P Nussbaum; Samantha Thomas; Mohamed A Adam; Dan G Blazer; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ari Kassardjian; Nicholas Stanzione; Timothy R Donahue; Zev A Wainberg; Lauren Damato; Hanlin L Wang
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Comparison of computed tomography and pathologic examination for evaluation of response of primary lung cancer to neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  M Seto; K Kuriyama; T Kasugai; S Kido; Y Sawai; C Kuroda; K Kodama; O Doi; T Horai; M Ando
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Impact of hypofractionated and standard fractionated chemoradiation before pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Christopher H Crane; Eugene J Koay; Prajnan Das; Sunil Krishnan; Laura Prakash; Rebecca A Snyder; Gauri R Varadhachary; Robert A Wolff; Milind Javle; Rachna T Shroff; David Fogelman; Michael Overman; Huamin Wang; Anirban Maitra; Jeffrey E Lee; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Pancreatic gross tumor volume contouring on computed tomography (CT) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Results of an international contouring conference.

Authors:  William A Hall; Hanne D Heerkens; Eric S Paulson; Gert J Meijer; Alexis N Kotte; Paul Knechtges; Parag J Parikh; Michael F Bassetti; Percy Lee; Katharine L Aitken; Manisha Palta; Sten Myrehaug; Eugene J Koay; Lorraine Portelance; Edgar Ben-Josef; Beth A Erickson
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29

9.  Modification of the 8th AJCC staging system of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Teddy Sutardji Nagaria; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 10.  Detecting tumour response and predicting resectability after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Savio G Barreto; Benjamin Loveday; John A Windsor; Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Critical issues in pathologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resected after neoadjuvant treatment: a narrative review.

Authors:  Mehran Taherian; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 2.  Role of imaging in evaluating the response after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Zi-Xing Huang; Bin Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.