BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy has theoretical benefits for pancreatic cancer; however, its association with perioperative outcomes remains controversial. This study sought to evaluate variation in use of neoadjuvant therapy and outcomes following pancreatic resection. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (1998-2011) was queried for patients with Stage I or II pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Subjects were classified by use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Factors associated with use of neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A 18 243 patients were identified; 1375 (7.5%) received neoadjuvant therapy. From 1998 to 2011, use of neoadjuvant therapy increased from 4.3% to 17.0%. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were younger (63.1 vs 66.1 years, P = 0.001) and more likely to receive treatment at an academic facility (64.4% vs 51.4%, P < 0.001). Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were more likely to have negative margins (77.8% vs 85.5%), negative lymph nodes (42.9% vs 59.3%) and tumors confined to the pancreas (65.8% vs 70.6%, all P < 0.001). Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy had lower 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 4.6%, P < 0.001) and readmission rates (7.4% vs 9.5%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy use is increasing and associated with comparable short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy has theoretical benefits for pancreatic cancer; however, its association with perioperative outcomes remains controversial. This study sought to evaluate variation in use of neoadjuvant therapy and outcomes following pancreatic resection. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (1998-2011) was queried for patients with Stage I or II pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Subjects were classified by use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Factors associated with use of neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A 18 243 patients were identified; 1375 (7.5%) received neoadjuvant therapy. From 1998 to 2011, use of neoadjuvant therapy increased from 4.3% to 17.0%. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were younger (63.1 vs 66.1 years, P = 0.001) and more likely to receive treatment at an academic facility (64.4% vs 51.4%, P < 0.001). Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were more likely to have negative margins (77.8% vs 85.5%), negative lymph nodes (42.9% vs 59.3%) and tumors confined to the pancreas (65.8% vs 70.6%, all P < 0.001). Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy had lower 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 4.6%, P < 0.001) and readmission rates (7.4% vs 9.5%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy use is increasing and associated with comparable short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.
Authors: Jae P Jung; Mazen S Zenati; Ahmad Hamad; Melissa E Hogg; Richard L Simmons; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Brian A Boone Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Asmita Chopra; Mazen Zenati; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Nathan Bahary; Amer H Zureikat; Joal D Beane Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-05-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Susanna W L de Geus; Gyulnara G Kasumova; Mariam F Eskander; Sing Chau Ng; Tara S Kent; A James Moser; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sara L Zettervall; Tammy Ju; Jeremy L Holzmacher; Lisbi Rivas; Paul P Lin; Khashayar Vaziri Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Timothy J Vreeland; Florencia McAllister; Sanaz Javadi; Laura R Prakash; David R Fogelman; Linus Ho; Gauri Varadhachary; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Michael P Kim; Matthew H G Katz; Ching-Wei D Tzeng Journal: Pancreas Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Courtney J Pokrzywa; Daniel E Abbott; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Emily R Winslow; Sharon M Weber; Alexander V Fisher Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Patrick W Underwood; Michael H Gerber; Kathy Nguyen; Daniel Delitto; Song Han; Ryan M Thomas; Christopher E Forsmark; Jose G Trevino; William E Gooding; Steven J Hughes Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 6.113