Literature DB >> 3322071

Objective knee evaluation using the Genucom Knee Analysis System. Clinical implications.

J H Oliver1, L P Coughlin.   

Abstract

The Genucom Knee Analysis System was used in a clinical setting to study the clinical practicality of the Genucom instrument, and the degree of correlation between Genucom and clinical knee examinations. The Genucom evaluation performed by an experienced examiner required 25 to 30 minutes for a 14 test bilateral examination. The instrument provided detailed graphical and tabular data of the test results. One hundred "normal knees" were examined in a series of seven Genucom tests. Normal "laxity bands" for both males and females were generated for a range of load applications for the seven tests. There was no significant difference observed between the male and female laxity distributions. However, a slightly lesser laxity was observed for the male population in general. A group of 38 subjects with 1 injured knee were assessed concurrently using clinical and instrument techniques. Comparisons were made for the 90 degrees anterior-posterior (AP) drawer, the 30 degrees AP drawer (Lachman), and the varus/valgus stress test. For the 90 degrees AP drawer test, 16 subjects were found clinically to have less than or equal to 5 mm of excess laxity based on comparison with the opposite normal knee. The instrumented measurement concurred in 10 cases. In the other six cases it was noted that laxity on the uninjured knee reached the maximum of the "normal" instrumented population, that is with higher than normal laxities. Fifteen subjects were clinically tested with greater than 5 mm of excess laxity. The instrumented test concurred in all but one.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3322071     DOI: 10.1177/036354658701500609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Jüri Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jón Karlsson; Ninni Sernert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The relationship of anterior and rotatory laxity between surgical navigation and clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Shingo Ohkawa; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Atsuo Nakamae; Tomoyuki Nakasa; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichi Hoshino; Daisuke Araki; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Kouki Nagamune; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

6.  Knee-laxity measurements examined by a left-hand- and a right-hand-dominant physiotherapist, in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ninni Sernert; Janett Helmers; Catarina Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Assessment of anterior cruciate laxity using the Genucom System.

Authors:  H N Andersen; P A Frandsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.