Literature DB >> 33219658

Coyotes as Reservoirs for Onchocerca lupi, United States, 2015-2018.

Chandler C Roe, Hayley Yaglom, April Howard, Jennifer Urbanz, Guilherme G Verocai, Lela Andrews, Veronica Harrison, Riley Barnes, Ted Lyons, Jolene R Bowers, David M Engelthaler.   

Abstract

The Onchocerca lupi nematode infects dogs, cats, and humans, but whether it can be spread by coyotes has been unknown. We conducted surveillance for O. lupi nematode infection in coyotes in the southwestern United States. We identified multiple coyote populations in Arizona and New Mexico as probable reservoirs for this species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arizona; Canis latrans; Nevada; New Mexico; Onchocerca lupi; United States; amplicon sequencing; coyotes; nematodes; onchocerciasis; parasites; phylogenetics; zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33219658      PMCID: PMC7706981          DOI: 10.3201/eid2612.190136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Onchocerca lupi is a species of zoonotic, filarial nematode that causes onchocerciasis in dogs, cats, and humans. It was first described in 1967 in Georgia, then part of the USSR, in the periocular tissues of a wolf (Canis lupus lupus) () and has been reported in dogs (C. lupus domesticus). Since 2013, increased detection of O. lupi infections in dogs and humans in the United States and Europe has renewed interest in this parasite, its geographic distribution, and the range of its natural hosts (). The geographic distribution and prevalence of the O. lupi nematode in the United States is unknown. US veterinarians are not required to report O. lupi infections in canines, making it difficult to identify the parasite’s geographic distribution. The first documented case of O. lupi infection in the United States affected a dog in California in 1991 (); since then, O. lupi infections have been reported in dogs, cats, and humans in Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah (,,,). This parasitic nematode is now endemic in domesticated canines in the southwestern United States (). Reports of O. lupi infection in Canada (Alberta and Prince Edward Island) () associated with dog importation from the southwestern United States and travel of US companion animals suggest an anthropogenic spread of the O. lupi nematode. Whether wild canids, including coyotes (C. latrans), might be reservoirs for the O. lupi nematode is unknown. Because of the growing number of O. lupi infections in canines and humans, public health officials must understand the prevalence and distribution of this parasite in wildlife. Toward that goal, we investigated coyote populations in Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada as potential primary hosts and natural reservoirs for the O. lupi nematode.

The Study

From December 2015 through July 2018, we collected skin tissue samples from coyotes harvested for predation management and from a hunt in Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada conducted by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. We did not euthanize any coyotes for the specific purpose of this study. Skin tissue from the interocular frontal area of the animal’s head was removed and stored in 80% ethanol until we extracted the DNA. We screened 707 DNA sequences for an O. lupi cytochrome c oxidase (COI) gene () using SYBR Green–real-time PCR on a QuantStudio 7 Flex Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com). We used DNA from an adult worm from an infected dog in northern Arizona as a positive control (GenBank accession no. MT878136). We included a no-template control in every real-time PCR reaction plate. We compared the product’s melting curve to the positive control using a dissociation curve. We prepared every sample that had a melting curve resembling that of the positive control for amplicon sequencing using neat DNA and Illumina (https://www.illumina.com) technologies. Thirty-seven (5.2%) samples from 8 counties in Arizona and New Mexico (Table) had sequences that aligned with the reference gene. Of these samples, 36 were from Arizona and 1 was from Hildago County, New Mexico. In Arizona, the highest prevalences of O. lupi infection were in Navajo County (17 [35.4%] positive coyotes) and Apache County (10 [9.4%]) (Figure 1). Coconino County had the third highest number (5) of coyotes that tested positive for the O. lupi nematode but a lower positivity rate (2.7%) than other counties. For example, in Hidalgo County we sampled only 2 coyotes, 1 of which tested positive.
Table

Coyotes tested for Onchocerca lupi nematodes, United States, 2015–2018

LocationNo. samplesNo. (%) positive samples Coyote sex
Coyote age group
MFAdultYouth
Arizona
Coconino1895 (2.7)979217712
Apache10610 (9.4)56508818
Yavapai861 (1.2)4937788
Cochise7504431669
Mohave*561 (1.8)2926533
Navajo*4817 (35.4)3116453
Graham4802424462
Maricopa421 (2.4)19233210
La Paz141 (7.1)59122
Pima602460
Pinal301230
Yuma101010
Unknown†100110
Unknown†
1
0
0
1

1
0
New Mexico
Catron705261
McKinley100110
San Juan401340
Torrence403131
Tucamari301230
Quay303030
Hildago21 (50.0)1120
Zuni
1
0
1
0

1
0
Nevada
Elko403140
Nye201120

*Mohave and Navajo Counties each had 1 sample for which host sex was not recorded.
†2 samples from Arizona did not have a recorded county.

Figure 1

Number of Onchocerca lupi nematode–positive coyotes collected, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. Positivity rates are provided for each county with O. lupi–positive coyotes.

*Mohave and Navajo Counties each had 1 sample for which host sex was not recorded.
†2 samples from Arizona did not have a recorded county. Number of Onchocerca lupi nematode–positive coyotes collected, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. Positivity rates are provided for each county with O. lupi–positive coyotes. We produced a phylogenetic tree of our 43 COI sequences (including 4 that were isolated from infected dogs and 2 from humans [GenBank accession nos. MT878134–9]) in addition to 30 O. lupi COI genes on GenBank spanning 432 total bases containing 12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Figure 2) using IQTREE version 1.6.9 () software with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Examining only this region of the COI gene, we determined the US samples (from dogs, cats, coyotes, and humans) clustered within a single clade with dog samples from Germany, Romania, and Greece. Within this clade, we detected no SNP differences. This clade was separated from a sample from Hungary by 1 SNP and from a single clade containing a human isolate from Turkey and a dog sample from Greece by 1 SNP.
Figure 2

Rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the cytochrome oxidase c gene sequence from 73 Onchocerca lupi nematode samples, including 43 newly obtained samples from 37 coyotes, 4 dogs, and 2 humans, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. This analysis covers 432 bases. Branch lengths indicate the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms; red dots indicate bootstrap values >99; blue dots indicate bootstrap values <65. Countries of collection, host species, and year of collection are indicated. Newly sequenced specimens are in bold. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the cytochrome oxidase c gene sequence from 73 Onchocerca lupi nematode samples, including 43 newly obtained samples from 37 coyotes, 4 dogs, and 2 humans, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. This analysis covers 432 bases. Branch lengths indicate the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms; red dots indicate bootstrap values >99; blue dots indicate bootstrap values <65. Countries of collection, host species, and year of collection are indicated. Newly sequenced specimens are in bold. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Conclusions

O. lupi infection has been reported mainly in domestic dogs and cats in the southwestern United States (,). However, international transportation (purchasing, adopting, and exporting) of dogs from that area has introduced this parasite into environments to which it is not endemic (,). We hypothesize coyotes are reservoirs for the O. lupi nematode and could spread this parasite throughout the southwestern United States. We consider the probable importance of coyotes as natural reservoirs and dispersal agents. In the United States, the average home territory covered by a resident coyote population (either a pack or lone coyote) is 5–41 km2, whereas solitary transient coyote territories are up to 155 km2 (,). The large geographic range and widespread occurrence of not only coyotes, but also the putative black fly vector (Diptera: Simuliidae) (), might facilitate the spread and establishment of the O. lupi nematode in the southwestern United States. Furthermore, many North American wild canids, such as wolves and foxes, have never been assessed for the O. lupi nematode but also should be considered as potential reservoirs. Although the O. lupi nematode is only endemic to the southwestern United States, without appropriate surveillance and mitigation strategies it might spread across the United States and into Canada and Mexico. We are not aware of any reports of O. lupi nematodes in Mexico; however, we identified a coyote that tested positive for O. lupi infection in Hildago County, which borders Mexico. Increasing surveillance in nearby counties upon identification of O. lupi nematode–positive coyotes would be prudent. Furthermore, the overlap of rural human residences with coyote and black fly populations probably increases the risk for human exposure. In summary, canine onchocerciasis is an ongoing emerging infectious threat to wildlife, companion animals, and humans. The expanding range to which the O. lupi nematode is endemic, coupled with increased incidence of onchocerciasis in humans and canines in the southwestern United States, reinforces the need to understand, respond to, and potentially mitigate this threat. This understanding will enable the development of surveillance and mitigation strategies, determine the risk of spread to nonendemic regions, and identify human populations at high risk of infection.
  9 in total

1.  International dog travelling and risk for zoonotic Onchocerca lupi.

Authors:  V Colella; R P Lia; G Di Paola; H Cortes; L Cardoso; D Otranto
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  Onchocerciasis in a California dog.

Authors:  T C Orihel; L R Ash; H J Holshuh; S Santenelli
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Canine ocular onchocercosis in the United States is associated with Onchocerca lupi.

Authors:  Amber L Labelle; Carol W Maddox; Joshua B Daniels; Saraswathi Lanka; Therese E Eggett; Richard R Dubielzig; Philippe Labelle
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 4.  Zoonotic Onchocerca lupi infection in a 22-month-old child in Arizona: first report in the United States and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark L Eberhard; Gholamabbas Amin Ostovar; Kote Chundu; Dan Hobohm; Iman Feiz-Erfan; Blaine A Mathison; Henry S Bishop; Paul T Cantey
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Canine ocular onchocerciasis: a retrospective review of the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of 16 cases in New Mexico (2011-2015).

Authors:  Nancy Johnstone McLean; Kimberly Newkirk; Coenraad M Adema
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.644

6.  The Emergence of Zoonotic Onchocerca lupi Infection in the United States--A Case-Series.

Authors:  Paul T Cantey; Jessica Weeks; Morven Edwards; Suchitra Rao; G Amin Ostovar; Walter Dehority; Maria Alzona; Sara Swoboda; Brooke Christiaens; Wassim Ballan; John Hartley; Andrew Terranella; Jill Weatherhead; James J Dunn; Douglas P Marx; M John Hicks; Ronald A Rauch; Christiana Smith; Megan K Dishop; Michael H Handler; Roy W R Dudley; Kote Chundu; Dan Hobohm; Iman Feiz-Erfan; Joseph Hakes; Ryan S Berry; Shelly Stepensaski; Benjamin Greenfield; Laura Shroeder; Henry Bishop; Marcos de Almeida; Blaine Mathison; Mark Eberhard
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Isolation of Onchocerca lupi in Dogs and Black Flies, California, USA.

Authors:  Hassan K Hassan; Shanna Bolcen; Joseph Kubofcik; Thomas B Nutman; Mark L Eberhard; Kelly Middleton; Joseph Wakoli Wekesa; Gimena Ruedas; Kimberly J Nelson; Richard Dubielzig; Melissa De Lombaert; Bruce Silverman; Jamie J Schorling; Peter H Adler; Thomas R Unnasch; Emily S Beeler
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies.

Authors:  Lam-Tung Nguyen; Heiko A Schmidt; Arndt von Haeseler; Bui Quang Minh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Onchocerca lupi Nematodes in Dogs Exported from the United States into Canada.

Authors:  Guilherme G Verocai; Gary Conboy; Manigandan Lejeune; Fany Marron; Paul Hanna; Erin MacDonald; Brian Skorobohach; Brian Wilcock; Susan J Kutz; John S Gilleard
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.883

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Confirmed cases of human Onchocerca lupi infection: a systematic review of an emerging threat.

Authors:  Ali Asghari; Ghazaaleh Adhami; Seyyed Ali Shariatzadeh; Bahareh Kordi; Davood Anvari; Morteza Shams; Hamidreza Majidiani; Mohammad Mahdi Darvishi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.383

2.  Complete mitochondrial genome of Onchocerca lupi (Nematoda, Onchocercidae).

Authors:  Chandler C Roe; Jennifer Urbanz; Lela Andrews; Guilherme G Verocai; David M Engelthaler; Crystal M Hepp; Jason W Sahl
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 0.610

Review 3.  Zoonotic Ocular Onchocercosis by Onchocerca lupi.

Authors:  Alicia Rojas; Fernando Morales-Calvo; Harold Salant; Domenico Otranto; Gad Baneth
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2021-06-30

4.  Presence of a cryptic Onchocerca species in black flies of northern California, USA.

Authors:  Matthew Kulpa; Kimberly J Nelson; Alana M Morales; Bonnie M Ryan; Michelle L Koschik; Jamesina J Scott; Guilherme G Verocai
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.876

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.