Nicholas L Wood1, Amber B Kernodle2, Andrew J Hartley3, Dorry L Segev2,4, Sommer E Gentry1. 1. Department of Mathematics, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 2. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. 3. Department of Mathematics, Furman University, Greenville, SC. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In February 2020, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network replaced donor service area-based allocation of livers with acuity circles, a system based on three homogeneous circles around each donor hospital. This system has been criticized for neglecting to consider varying population density and proximity to coast and national borders. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from July 2013 to June 2017, we designed heterogeneous circles to reduce both circle size and variation in liver supply/demand ratios across transplant centers. We weighted liver demand by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) because higher MELD/PELD candidates are more likely to be transplanted. Transplant centers in the West had the largest circles; transplant centers in the Midwest and South had the smallest circles. Supply/demand ratios ranged from 0.471 to 0.655 livers per MELD-weighted incident candidate. Our heterogeneous circles had lower variation in supply/demand ratios than homogeneous circles of any radius between 150 and 1,000 nautical miles (nm). Homogeneous circles of 500 nm, the largest circle used in the acuity circles allocation system, had a variance in supply/demand ratios 16 times higher than our heterogeneous circles (0.0156 vs. 0.0009) and a range of supply/demand ratios 2.3 times higher than our heterogeneous circles (0.421 vs. 0.184). Our heterogeneous circles had a median (interquartile range) radius of only 326 (275-470) nm but reduced disparities in supply/demand ratios significantly by accounting for population density, national borders, and geographic variation of supply and demand. CONCLUSIONS: Large homogeneous circles create logistical burdens on transplant centers that do not need them, whereas small homogeneous circles increase geographic disparity. Using carefully designed heterogeneous circles can reduce geographic disparity in liver supply/demand ratios compared with homogeneous circles of radius ranging from 150 to 1,000 nm.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In February 2020, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network replaced donor service area-based allocation of livers with acuity circles, a system based on three homogeneous circles around each donor hospital. This system has been criticized for neglecting to consider varying population density and proximity to coast and national borders. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from July 2013 to June 2017, we designed heterogeneous circles to reduce both circle size and variation in liver supply/demand ratios across transplant centers. We weighted liver demand by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) because higher MELD/PELD candidates are more likely to be transplanted. Transplant centers in the West had the largest circles; transplant centers in the Midwest and South had the smallest circles. Supply/demand ratios ranged from 0.471 to 0.655 livers per MELD-weighted incident candidate. Our heterogeneous circles had lower variation in supply/demand ratios than homogeneous circles of any radius between 150 and 1,000 nautical miles (nm). Homogeneous circles of 500 nm, the largest circle used in the acuity circles allocation system, had a variance in supply/demand ratios 16 times higher than our heterogeneous circles (0.0156 vs. 0.0009) and a range of supply/demand ratios 2.3 times higher than our heterogeneous circles (0.421 vs. 0.184). Our heterogeneous circles had a median (interquartile range) radius of only 326 (275-470) nm but reduced disparities in supply/demand ratios significantly by accounting for population density, national borders, and geographic variation of supply and demand. CONCLUSIONS: Large homogeneous circles create logistical burdens on transplant centers that do not need them, whereas small homogeneous circles increase geographic disparity. Using carefully designed heterogeneous circles can reduce geographic disparity in liver supply/demand ratios compared with homogeneous circles of radius ranging from 150 to 1,000 nm.
Authors: Christine E Haugen; Tanveen Ishaque; Abel Sapirstein; Alexander Cauneac; Dorry L Segev; Sommer Gentry Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Abbas Rana; Bruce Kaplan; Irbaz B Riaz; Marian Porubsky; Shahid Habib; Horacio Rilo; Angelika C Gruessner; Rainer W G Gruessner Journal: Transplantation Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Neehar D Parikh; Wesley J Marrero; Christopher J Sonnenday; Anna S Lok; David W Hutton; Mariel S Lavieri Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: S E Gentry; A B Massie; S W Cheek; K L Lentine; E H Chow; C E Wickliffe; N Dzebashvili; P R Salvalaggio; M A Schnitzler; D A Axelrod; D L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Sommer E Gentry; Eric K H Chow; Corey E Wickliffe; Allan B Massie; Tabitha Leighton; Dorry L Segev Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.799