Literature DB >> 29365357

Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.

Kristopher P Croome1, David D Lee1, Justin M Burns1, Andrew P Keaveny1, C Burcin Taner1.   

Abstract

Variation in average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at liver transplantation (LT) by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) regions is well documented. The present study aimed to investigate MELD variation at the interregional, intraregional, and intra-donation service area (DSA) levels. Patients undergoing LT between 2015 and 2016 were obtained from the UNOS standard analysis and research file. The distribution of allocation MELD score including median, skew, and kurtosis was examined for all transplant programs. Intraregional median allocation MELD varied significantly within all 11 UNOS regions. The largest variation between programs was seen in region 5 (MELD 24.0 versus 38.5) and region 3 (MELD 20.5 versus 32.0). Regions 1, 5, and 9 had the largest proportion of programs with a highly negative skewed MELD score (50%, 57%, and 57%, respectively), whereas regions 3, 6, 10, and 11 did not have any programs with a highly negative skew. MELD score distribution was also examined in programs located in the same DSA, where no barriers exist and theoretically no significant difference in allocation should be observed. The largest DSA variation in median allocation MELD score was seen in NYRT-OP1 LiveOnNY (MELD score variation 11), AZOB-OP1 Donor Network of Arizona (MELD score variation 11), MAOB-OP1 New England Organ Bank (MELD score variation 9), and TXGC-OP1 LifeGift Organ Donation Ctr (MELD score variation 9). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that this MELD disparity is not only present at the interregional level but can be seen within regions and even within DSAs between programs located as close as several city blocks away. Although organ availability likely accounts for a component of this disparity, the present study suggests that transplant center behavior may also play a significant role. Liver Transplantation 24 488-496 2018 AASLD.
© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29365357     DOI: 10.1002/lt.25021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  7 in total

1.  Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.

Authors:  Christine E Haugen; Tanveen Ishaque; Abel Sapirstein; Alexander Cauneac; Dorry L Segev; Sommer Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Brittany A Shelton; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Kimberly A Forde; Deirdre Sawinski; Meagan Gray; Nancy L Ascher
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  The Changing Landscapes in DCD Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2020-07-13

4.  Impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease allocation system on outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Han Sang Park; Jeong-Moo Lee; Kwangpyo Hong; Eui Soo Han; Suk Kyun Hong; YoungRok Choi; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-08-31

5.  Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Nicholas L Wood; Amber B Kernodle; Andrew J Hartley; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 17.298

6.  Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Avesh J Thuluvath; John Peipert; Rachel Berkowitz; Osama Siddiqui; Bridget Whitehead; Arielle Thomas; Josh Levitsky; Juan Caicedo-Ramirez; Daniela P Ladner
Journal:  Dig Med Res       Date:  2021-09-30

7.  Donor Hepatic Occult Collagen Deposition Predisposes to Peritransplant Stress and Impacts Human Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Hirofumi Hirao; Takahiro Ito; Jerzy W Kupiec-Weglinski; Fady M Kaldas; Kentaro Kadono; Hidenobu Kojima; Bita V Naini; Kojiro Nakamura; Shoichi Kageyama; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 17.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.