Literature DB >> 33218292

Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.

Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez1, Alejandro J Tenorio1, Kevin T Campbell1, Eduardo A Silva1, J Kent Leach1,2.   

Abstract

To realize the promise of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, it is imperative to develop bioinks that possess the necessary biological and rheological characteristics for printing cell-laden tissue grafts. Alginate is widely used as a bioink because its rheological properties can be modified through precrosslinking or the addition of thickening agents to increase printing resolution. However, modification of alginate's physiochemical characteristics using common crosslinking agents can affect its cytocompatibility. Therefore, we evaluated the printability, physicochemical properties, and osteogenic potential of four common alginate bioinks: alginate-CaCl2 (alg-CaCl2), alginate-CaSO4 (alg-CaSO4), alginate-gelatin (alg-gel), and alginate-nanocellulose (alg-ncel) for the 3D bioprinting of anatomically accurate osteogenic grafts. While all bioinks possessed similar viscosity, printing fidelity was lower in the precrosslinked bioinks. When used to print geometrically defined constructs, alg-CaSO4 and alg-ncel exhibited higher mechanical properties and lower mesh size than those printed with alg-CaCl2 or alg-gel. The physical properties of these constructs affected the biological performance of encapsulated bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Cell-laden constructs printed using alg-CaSO4 and alg-ncel exhibited greater cell apoptosis and contained fewer living cells 7 days postprinting. In addition, effective cell-matrix interactions were only observed in alg-CaCl2 printed constructs. When cultured in osteogenic media, MSCs in alg-CaCl2 constructs exhibited increased osteogenic differentiation compared to the other three bioinks. This bioink was then used to 3D print anatomically accurate cell-laden scaphoid bones that were capable of partial mineralization after 14 days of in vitro culture. These results highlight the importance of bioink properties to modulate cell behavior and the biofabrication of clinically relevant bone tissues. Impact statement Alginate-based bioinks are widely used for three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of bone tissues. However, a direct systematic comparison between alginate-based bioinks is needed to assess the optimal bioink properties for mesenchymal stromal cell survival and osteogenesis. This study evaluates the printability, physical properties, biocompatibility, and osteogenic potential of four commonly used alginate-based bioinks and establishes the importance of bioink properties for advancing toward the clinical translation of 3D bioprinted bone grafts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alginate; bioink; bioprinting; mesenchymal stromal cell; osteogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33218292      PMCID: PMC8558068          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   4.080


  54 in total

Review 1.  The potential impact of bone tissue engineering in the clinic.

Authors:  Ruchi Mishra; Tyler Bishop; Ian L Valerio; John P Fisher; David Dean
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  3D Bioprinting Using a Templated Porous Bioink.

Authors:  James P K Armstrong; Madeline Burke; Benjamin M Carter; Sean A Davis; Adam W Perriman
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.

Authors:  Naomi Paxton; Willi Smolan; Thomas Böck; Ferry Melchels; Jürgen Groll; Tomasz Jungst
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 9.954

4.  The Use of Three-Dimensional Printing for Complex Scaphoid Fractures.

Authors:  Nicholas Jew; Joseph D Lipman; Michelle G Carlson
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Computational-Based Design of Hydrogels with Predictable Mesh Properties.

Authors:  Kevin T Campbell; Kajetan Wysoczynski; Dustin J Hadley; Eduardo A Silva
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Alginate-Chitosan Hydrogels Provide a Sustained Gradient of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate for Therapeutic Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Priscilla A Williams; Kevin T Campbell; Hessam Gharaviram; Justin L Madrigal; Eduardo A Silva
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties.

Authors:  C K Kuo; P X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Bone fracture healing: cell therapy in delayed unions and nonunions.

Authors:  Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Philippe Rosset; Daniel Lozano; Julien Stanovici; Christian Ermthaller; Florian Gerbhard
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Alginate Sulfate-Nanocellulose Bioinks for Cartilage Bioprinting Applications.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Ece Öztürk; Øystein Arlov; Paul Gatenholm; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of complex cell laden alginate hydrogel structures.

Authors:  Atabak Ghanizadeh Tabriz; Miguel A Hermida; Nicholas R Leslie; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.954

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization.

Authors:  Sebastian Freeman; Stefano Calabro; Roma Williams; Sha Jin; Kaiming Ye
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Characterization of Induction and Targeting of Senescent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Robert C H Gresham; Devanshi Kumar; Jonathan Copp; Mark A Lee; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 3.  Application Progress of Modified Chitosan and Its Composite Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yuemeng Zhu; Yidi Zhang; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Advanced Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Tissue and Organ Analogs Using Alginate Hydrogel Bioinks.

Authors:  Qiqi Gao; Byoung-Soo Kim; Ge Gao
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.118

5.  3D Bio-Printability of Hybrid Pre-Crosslinked Hydrogels.

Authors:  Cartwright Nelson; Slesha Tuladhar; Loren Launen; Ahasan Habib
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.