Literature DB >> 33217381

Sample Preparation and Imaging Conditions Affect mEos3.2 Photophysics in Fission Yeast Cells.

Mengyuan Sun1, Kevin Hu2, Joerg Bewersdorf3, Thomas D Pollard4.   

Abstract

Photoconvertible fluorescent proteins (PCFPs) are widely used in super-resolution microscopy and studies of cellular dynamics. However, our understanding of their photophysics is still limited, hampering their quantitative application. For example, we do not know the optimal sample preparation methods or imaging conditions to count protein molecules fused to PCFPs by single-molecule localization microscopy in live and fixed cells. We also do not know how the behavior of PCFPs in live cells compares with fixed cells. Therefore, we investigated how formaldehyde fixation influences the photophysical properties of the popular green-to-red PCFP mEos3.2 in fission yeast cells under a wide range of imaging conditions. We estimated photophysical parameters by fitting a three-state model of photoconversion and photobleaching to the time course of fluorescence signal per yeast cell expressing mEos3.2. We discovered that formaldehyde fixation makes the fluorescence signal, photoconversion rate, and photobleaching rate of mEos3.2 sensitive to the buffer conditions likely by permeabilizing the yeast cell membrane. Under some imaging conditions, the time-integrated mEos3.2 signal per yeast cell is similar in live cells and fixed cells imaged in buffer at pH 8.5 with 1 mM DTT, indicating that light chemical fixation does not destroy mEos3.2 molecules. We also discovered that 405-nm irradiation drove some red-state mEos3.2 molecules to enter an intermediate dark state, which can be converted back to the red fluorescent state by 561-nm illumination. Our findings provide a guide to quantitatively compare conditions for imaging mEos3.2-tagged molecules in yeast cells. Our imaging assay and mathematical model are easy to implement and provide a simple quantitative approach to measure the time-integrated signal and the photoconversion and photobleaching rates of fluorescent proteins in cells.
Copyright © 2020 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33217381      PMCID: PMC7820738          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  40 in total

1.  EosFP, a fluorescent marker protein with UV-inducible green-to-red fluorescence conversion.

Authors:  Jörg Wiedenmann; Sergey Ivanchenko; Franz Oswald; Florian Schmitt; Carlheinz Röcker; Anya Salih; Klaus-Dieter Spindler; G Ulrich Nienhaus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM).

Authors:  Michael J Rust; Mark Bates; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Rational design of true monomeric and bright photoactivatable fluorescent proteins.

Authors:  Mingshu Zhang; Hao Chang; Yongdeng Zhang; Junwei Yu; Lijie Wu; Wei Ji; Juanjuan Chen; Bei Liu; Jingze Lu; Yingfang Liu; Junlong Zhang; Pingyong Xu; Tao Xu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Single-molecule evaluation of fluorescent protein photoactivation efficiency using an in vivo nanotemplate.

Authors:  Nela Durisic; Lara Laparra-Cuervo; Angel Sandoval-Álvarez; Joseph Steven Borbely; Melike Lakadamyali
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Algorithmic corrections for localization microscopy with sCMOS cameras - characterisation of a computationally efficient localization approach.

Authors:  Ruisheng Lin; Alexander H Clowsley; Isuru D Jayasinghe; David Baddeley; Christian Soeller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  A General Mechanism of Photoconversion of Green-to-Red Fluorescent Proteins Based on Blue and Infrared Light Reduces Phototoxicity in Live-Cell Single-Molecule Imaging.

Authors:  Bartosz Turkowyd; Alexander Balinovic; David Virant; Haruko G Gölz Carnero; Fabienne Caldana; Marc Endesfelder; Dominique Bourgeois; Ulrike Endesfelder
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Green fluorescent protein photobleaching: a model for protein damage by endogenous and exogenous singlet oxygen.

Authors:  L Greenbaum; C Rothmann; R Lavie; Z Malik
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.915

8.  Counting cytokinesis proteins globally and locally in fission yeast.

Authors:  Jian-Qiu Wu; Thomas D Pollard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Quantifying and optimizing single-molecule switching nanoscopy at high speeds.

Authors:  Yu Lin; Jane J Long; Fang Huang; Whitney C Duim; Stefanie Kirschbaum; Yongdeng Zhang; Lena K Schroeder; Aleksander A Rebane; Mary Grace M Velasco; Alejandro Virrueta; Daniel W Moonan; Junyi Jiao; Sandy Y Hernandez; Yongli Zhang; Joerg Bewersdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Synthetic and genetic dimers as quantification ruler for single-molecule counting with PALM.

Authors:  Tim N Baldering; Marina S Dietz; Karl Gatterdam; Christos Karathanasis; Ralph Wieneke; Robert Tampé; Mike Heilemann
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.