| Literature DB >> 33215042 |
Kalirajan Rajagopal1, Potlapati Varakumar1, Aparma Baliwada1, Gowramma Byran1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In early 2020, many scientists are rushing to discover novel drugs and vaccines against the coronavirus, and treatments for COVID-19, because coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a life-threatening viral disease, affected first in China and quickly spread throughout the world. In this article, in silico studies have been performed to explore the binding modes of chemical constituents for natural remedies like Curcuma longa (turmeric) and Andrographis paniculata against COVID-19 (PDB ID 5R82) targeting coronavirus using Schrodinger suit 2019-4. The molecular docking studies are performed by the Glide module, in silico ADMET screening was performed by the QikProp module, and binding energy of ligands was calculated using the Prime MM-GB/SA module.Entities:
Keywords: Andrographis paniculata; Coronavirus (COVID-19); Curcuma longa (turmeric); Docking studies; MM-GBSA
Year: 2020 PMID: 33215042 PMCID: PMC7562761 DOI: 10.1186/s43094-020-00126-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Futur J Pharm Sci ISSN: 2314-7245
Docking studies for phytochemical constituents of Curcuma longa (turmeric) and Andrographis paniculata with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)
| Cpd | Glide score | Lipophilic | Phob En | H bond | XP electro | Low MW | Rot Penal | XP penalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T4_Cyclocurcumin | − 6.77 | − 4.12 | 0 | − 2.36 | − 0.35 | − 0.27 | 0.18 | 0 |
| N1_Andrographolide | − 6.26 | − 1.27 | 0 | − 4.01 | − 1.3 | − 0.33 | 0.2 | 0 |
| N7_dihydroxydimethoxyflavone | − 6.23 | − 2.69 | 0 | − 2.44 | − 0.84 | − 0.45 | 0.08 | 0 |
| T1_Curcumin | − 6.13 | − 4.14 | 0 | − 1.46 | − 0.72 | − 0.27 | 0.37 | 0 |
| T3_Bisdemethoxycurcumin | − 5.36 | − 4.13 | 0 | − 0.7 | − 0.6 | − 0.47 | 0.5 | 0 |
| T2_Demethoxycurcumin | − 5.25 | − 3.69 | 0 | − 1.06 | − 0.62 | − 0.37 | 0.42 | 0 |
| T7_Curcuphenol | − 5.13 | − 4.34 | 0 | − 0.7 | − 0.31 | − 0.5 | 0.6 | 0 |
| N3_14deoxy12hydroxyandrographolide | − 5.11 | − 2.89 | 0 | − 2.12 | − 0.27 | − 0.33 | 0.27 | 0 |
| T6_Curlone | − 3.89 | − 4.05 | 0 | 0 | − 0.07 | − 0.5 | 0.6 | 0 |
| N2_14deoxyandrographolide | − 3.88 | − 1.96 | 0 | − 2.07 | − 0.54 | − 0.39 | 0.29 | 0 |
| T5_Turmerone | − 3.78 | − 3.87 | 0 | 0 | − 0.01 | − 0.5 | 0.6 | 0 |
| N8_cinnamateester | − 3.31 | − 3.55 | 0 | 0 | − 0.02 | − 0.5 | 0.76 | 0 |
| N5_Stigmasterol | − 2.28 | − 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | − 0.12 | 0.15 | 1 |
| N6_βSitosterylfattyacidesters | − 1.89 | − 2.66 | 0 | − 0.3 | − 0.02 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 |
| N4_betaSitosterol | − 1.36 | − 1.86 | 0 | 0 | − 0.06 | − 0.12 | 0.2 | 0 |
| Hydroxychloroquine (Std) | − 5.47 | − 3.15 | 0 | − 1.75 | − 0.69 | − 0.38 | 0.5 | 0 |
In silico ADMET screening for phytochemical constituents of Curcuma longa (turmeric) and Andrographis paniculata
| Compounds | Mol. Wt. | Dipole | Donor HB | Accpt HB | QPlog o/w | #metab | Rule of five | %Human oral absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1_Curcumin | 368.385 | 8.366 | 2 | 7 | 3.301 | 5 | 0 | 88.976 |
| T2_Demethoxycurcumin | 338.359 | 9.291 | 2 | 6.25 | 2.821 | 4 | 0 | 85.615 |
| T3_Bisdemethoxycurcumin | 308.333 | 8.477 | 2 | 5.5 | 2.585 | 3 | 0 | 81.091 |
| T4_Cyclocurcumin | 368.385 | 5.335 | 2 | 5.75 | 3.488 | 6 | 0 | 90.504 |
| T5_Turmerone | 218.338 | 3.649 | 0 | 2 | 4.036 | 6 | 0 | 100 |
| T6_Curlone | 218.338 | 3.147 | 0 | 2 | 3.991 | 5 | 0 | 100 |
| T7_Curcuphenol | 218.338 | 1.472 | 1 | 0.75 | 4.419 | 6 | 0 | 100 |
| N1_Andrographolide | 350.454 | 6.319 | 3 | 8.1 | 1.455 | 6 | 0 | 77.655 |
| N2_14deoxyandrographolide | 334.455 | 4.004 | 2 | 6.4 | 2.46 | 6 | 0 | 91.184 |
| N3_14deoxy12OH_andrographolide | 350.454 | 4.508 | 2 | 7.1 | 2.04 | 6 | 0 | 83.156 |
| N4_betaSitosterol | 414.713 | 2.542 | 1 | 1.7 | 7.643 | 3 | 1 | 100 |
| N5_Stigmasterol | 412.698 | 2.464 | 1 | 1.7 | 7.473 | 5 | 1 | 100 |
| N6_βSitosterylfattyacidesters | 526.885 | 3.304 | 0 | 2 | 9.625 | 3 | 2 | 100 |
| N7_dihydroxydimethoxyflavone | 314.294 | 3.726 | 1 | 4.5 | 2.682 | 4 | 0 | 93.829 |
| N8_cinnamateester | 218.295 | 4.054 | 0 | 2 | 3.983 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Hydroxychloroquine (std) | 335.876 | 6.854 | 2 | 5.7 | 3.369 | 5 | 0 | 93.213 |
| 130–725 | 1–12.5 | 0–6 | 2–20 | − 2–6.5 | 1–8 | max 4 | > 80% is high < 25% is poor |
Mol. Wt. molecular weight of the molecule, Dipole computed dipole moment, Donor HB estimated number of hydrogen bonds that would be donated by the solute to water molecules in an aqueous solution, Accpt HB estimated number of hydrogen bonds that would be accepted by the solute from water molecules in an aqueous solution, QPlog o/w predicted octanol/water partition coefficient, #metab number of likely metabolic reactions, Rule of five number of violations of Lipinski’s rule of five, %Human oral absorption predicted human oral absorption on 0 to 100% scale
Binding free energy calculation using Prime/MM-GBSA approach
| Compd | MMGBSA_dG_Bind | MMGBSA | MMGBSA | MMGBSA_dG_Bind | MMGBSA | MMGBSA_dG_Bind_vdW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T4_Cyclocurcumin | − 36.0315 | − 31.6404 | 8.0570 | − 0.1385 | − 11.6120 | − 28.1951 |
| N1_Andrographolide | − 34.6766 | − 28.4227 | 6.9893 | − 1.9077 | − 4.4014 | − 28.5162 |
| N7_diOHdiOMeflavone | − 50.6953 | − 41.1895 | 1.6877 | − 1.5594 | − 8.5302 | − 26.2631 |
| T1_Curcumin | − 50.3408 | − 18.0802 | 1.5801 | − 2.6563 | − 11.9153 | − 42.2597 |
| T3_BisdeOMecurcumin | − 43.5559 | − 22.2542 | − 1.599 | 0.5231 | − 11.2505 | − 35.4184 |
| T2_Demethoxycurcumin | − 38.7071 | − 9.1482 | 6.6291 | − 1.3511 | − 11.0807 | − 42.2478 |
| T7_Curcuphenol | − 26.1402 | − 11.4548 | 14.9959 | 0.0274 | − 17.0435 | − 27.3193 |
| N3_14deoxy12OHandrographolide | − 29.3622 | − 5.8525 | − 9.0786 | 0.1215 | − 10.4797 | − 33.9966 |
| T6_Curlone | − 22.3669 | − 23.7502 | 2.6632 | − 0.3572 | − 9.3057 | − 17.1282 |
| N2_14deoxyandrographolide | − 39.6148 | − 17.6018 | 7.7512 | − 1.4333 | − 14.1630 | − 35.8594 |
| T5_Turmerone | − 24.1033 | 14.8710 | − 12.9950 | 3.1283 | − 8.2392 | − 37.1469 |
| N8_cinnamateester | − 30.7961 | 6.1548 | 1.5202 | 0.4830 | − 10.6485 | − 41.1941 |
| N5_Stigmasterol | − 31.5416 | 18.6211 | − 6.1436 | 2.5054 | − 15.3476 | − 41.7355 |
| N6_βSitosterylfattyacidesters | 1.1272 | 27.1428 | − 0.7667 | 3.0617 | − 5.4991 | − 29.3366 |
| N4_betaSitosterol | − 25.0588 | − 5.7182 | 1.8587 | 1.9414 | − 10.8267 | − 31.8647 |
| Hydroxychloroquine (std) | − 26.9975 | − 4.9621 | 2.1824 | 0.0011 | -9.2894 | − 33.0622 |
Fig. 1Structures of phytochemical constituents. a Chemical structures of selected major bioactive constituents of Curcuma longa (turmeric). b Chemical structures of selected major bioactive constituents of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees. c Structure of hydroxychloroquine (Std)
Fig. 2Docked poses of all compounds with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)
Fig. 3a Ligand interaction of compound T4_Cyclocurcuminwith SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82). b Ligand interaction of compound N1_Andrographolidewith SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82). c Ligand interaction of compound N7_dihydroxydimethoxyflavonewith SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82). d Ligand interaction of compound T1_Curcumin with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82). e Ligand interaction of compound hydroxychloroquine (Std) with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)
Fig. 4Best affinity mode of docked compounds with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)
Fig. 5Hydrogen bonding interaction of cpd N1_Andrographolide with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)
Fig. 6Hydrophilic/lipophilic map of cpd T4_Cyclocurcumin with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)
Fig. 7Rotational penalty of hydroxychloroquine (Std) with SARS CoV-2 main protease (5R82)