Literature DB >> 33213814

1-Year Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Shocks: The Subcutaneous ICD Post Approval Study.

Martin C Burke1, Johan D Aasbo2, Mikhael F El-Chami3, Raul Weiss4, Jay Dinerman5, Sam Hanon6, Gauthem Kalahasty7, Eric Bass8, Michael R Gold9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated spontaneous arrhythmias and clinical outcomes in the S-ICD System PAS (Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Post Approval Study) cohort.
BACKGROUND: The U.S. S-ICD PAS trial patient population more closely resembles transvenous ICD cohorts than earlier studies, which included many patients with little structural heart disease and few comorbidities. Early outcomes and low peri-operative complication rates were demonstrated in the S-ICD PAS cohort, but there are no data detailing spontaneous arrhythmias and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: The S-ICD PAS prospective registry included 1,637 de novo patients from 86 U.S. centers. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time to event, and multivariate logistic regression were performed using data out to 365 days.
RESULTS: Patients (68.5% men; mean ejection fraction of 32.0%; 42.9% ischemic; 13.4% on dialysis) underwent implantation for primary (76.6%) or secondary prevention indication. The complication-free rate was 92.5%. The appropriate shock (AS) rate was 5.3%. A total of 395 ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) episodes were appropriately sensed, with 131 (33.2%) self-terminating. First and final shock efficacy (up to 5 shocks) for the 127 discrete AS episodes were 91.3% and 100.0%, respectively. Discrete AS episodes included 67 monomorphic VT (MVT) and 60 polymorphic VT (PVT)/VF, with first shock efficacy of 95.2% and 86.7%, respectively. There were 19 storm events in 18 subjects, with 84.2% conversion success. Storm episodes were more likely PVT/VF (98 of 137).
CONCLUSIONS: In the first year after implantation, a predominantly primary prevention population with low ejection fraction demonstrated a high complication-free rate and spontaneous event shock efficacy for MVT and PVT/VF arrhythmias at rapid ventricular rates. (Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System Post Approval Study [S-ICD PAS; NCT01736618).
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrhythmia; heart failure; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; subcutaneous ICD; sudden cardiac death; ventricular arrhythmia

Year:  2020        PMID: 33213814     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Subcutaneous and Transvenous ICDs: an Update on Contemporary Questions and Controversies.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Albert S Tully; Emily P Zeitler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: long-term results of the EFFORTLESS study.

Authors:  Pier D Lambiase; Dominic A Theuns; Francis Murgatroyd; Craig Barr; Lars Eckardt; Petr Neuzil; Marcoen Scholten; Margaret Hood; Jȕrgen Kuschyk; Amy J Brisben; Nathan Carter; Timothy M Stivland; Reinoud Knops; Lucas V A Boersma
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 35.855

3.  Usefulness of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score in a Large Mixed Patient Cohort of Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Kevin Willy; Julia Köbe; Florian Reinke; Benjamin Rath; Christian Ellermann; Julian Wolfes; Felix K Wegner; Patrick R Leitz; Philipp S Lange; Lars Eckardt; Gerrit Frommeyer
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Abdominal Emergency After Subcutaneous ICD Implantation.

Authors:  S Allan Petty; Ramil Goel
Journal:  JACC Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.