Literature DB >> 33213290

Influence of species of negative control sera on results of a brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay.

Steven C Olsen1, Lauren S Crawford1, Antonio Fuentes2, Miladin Kostovic3, Paola M Boggiatto1.   

Abstract

We evaluated serologic responses of cattle, bison, elk, and swine representing negative control, early vaccination (4-8 wk), late vaccination (21-28 wk) or booster vaccination, early after-experimental challenge (2-4 wk), and late after-experimental challenge (8-21 wk), in a brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay (FPA; n = 10 sera per species per treatment) using negative control sera from cattle, bison, elk, and swine (n = 5 per species). Sera from cattle shedding Brucella abortus strain RB51 in milk were also evaluated against the 20 negative control sera. The species of negative control sera used in the FPA could increase (p < 0.05) delta millipolarization (mP; delta mP = sample mP - negative control mP) results. In general, the species of negative control sera did not alter the interpretation of FPA results in control, vaccinated, or infected animals. Even after repeated RB51 vaccinations in bison, cattle, or elk, or in cattle shedding RB51 in milk, serologic results from the FPA remained negative. Species differences in FPA results were noted; elk developed robust humoral responses very quickly after infection that resulted in strong positive FPA results. In cattle and bison, humoral responses appeared to develop over a longer period of time, and greater delta mP values were detected at later times after infection. Sensitivity of the FPA for detecting infected animals was greatest for elk in early challenge samples and bison in late challenge samples. Our data suggest that species of origin of negative control sera does not influence interpretation of the FPA in natural hosts of Brucella abortus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella abortus; bison; cattle; elk; fluorescence polarization assay; swine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33213290      PMCID: PMC7758695          DOI: 10.1177/1040638720970888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  18 in total

Review 1.  Brucellosis.

Authors:  Georgios Pappas; Nikolaos Akritidis; Mile Bosilkovski; Epameinondas Tsianos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Advancement of knowledge of Brucella over the past 50 years.

Authors:  S C Olsen; M V Palmer
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.221

3.  An evaluation of three serological tests for antibody to Brucella suis in pigs.

Authors:  R J Rogers; D R Cook; P J Ketterer; F C Baldock; P J Blackall; R W Stewart
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Identification of Brucella suis from feral swine in selected states in the USA.

Authors:  Kerri Pedersen; Christine R Quance; Suelee Robbe-Austerman; Antoinette J Piaggio; Sarah N Bevins; Samuel M Goldstein; Wesson D Gaston; Thomas J DeLiberto
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.535

Review 5.  Fluorescence polarization assay for the diagnosis of brucellosis: a review.

Authors:  K Nielsen; D Gall
Journal:  J Immunoassay Immunochem       Date:  2001

6.  Effects of exogenous recombinant interleukin-12 on immune responses and protection against Brucella abortus in a murine model.

Authors:  I K Lee; S C Olsen; C A Bolin
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Identification of Brucella spp. in feral swine (Sus scrofa) at abattoirs in Texas, USA.

Authors:  K Pedersen; N E Bauer; S Olsen; A M Arenas-Gamboa; A C Henry; T D Sibley; T Gidlewski
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 2.702

8.  Comparison of serologic tests and bacteriologic culture for detection of brucellosis in swine from naturally infected herds.

Authors:  R A Ferris; M A Schoenbaum; R P Crawford
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: case study.

Authors:  Felix Roth; Jakob Zinsstag; Dontor Orkhon; G Chimed-Ochir; Guy Hutton; Ottorino Cosivi; Guy Carrin; Joachim Otte
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Evaluation of three competitive ELISAs and a fluorescence polarisation assay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  A Praud; M Durán-Ferrer; D Fretin; M Jaÿ; M O'Connor; A Stournara; M Tittarelli; I Travassos Dias; B Garin-Bastuji
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.