Literature DB >> 28391650

Identification of Brucella spp. in feral swine (Sus scrofa) at abattoirs in Texas, USA.

K Pedersen1, N E Bauer2, S Olsen3, A M Arenas-Gamboa4, A C Henry5, T D Sibley5, T Gidlewski6.   

Abstract

Various tissues, nasal swabs, urine and blood samples were collected from 376 feral swine at two federally inspected abattoirs in Texas during six separate sampling periods in 2015. Samples were tested for Brucella spp. by culture and serology. Brucella spp. were cultured from 13.0% of feral swine, and antibodies were detected in 9.8%. Only 32.7% of culture-positive feral swine were also antibody positive, and 43.2% of antibody-positive feral swine were culture positive. Approximately, the same number of males (14.0%) and females (12.1%) were culture positive, and slightly more males (10.5%) than females (8.7%) were antibody positive. Our results indicate that serology likely underestimates the prevalence of feral swine infected, and that those who come in contact with feral swine should be aware of the symptoms of infection with Brucella spp. to ensure prompt treatment. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Sus scrofazzm321990; Brucella spp.; abattoir; brucellosis; feral swine; slaughter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391650     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  7 in total

1.  Transmission of antibiotic resistance at the wildlife-livestock interface.

Authors:  Shinyoung Lee; Peixin Fan; Ting Liu; Anni Yang; Raoul K Boughton; Kim M Pepin; Ryan S Miller; Kwangcheol Casey Jeong
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Framework for assessing vertebrate invasive species damage: the case of feral swine in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Shwiff; Alex Pelham; Steven Shwiff; William Haden-Chomphosy; Vienna R Brown; Karina Ernst; Aaron Anderson
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Influence of species of negative control sera on results of a brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay.

Authors:  Steven C Olsen; Lauren S Crawford; Antonio Fuentes; Miladin Kostovic; Paola M Boggiatto
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Field evaluation of low-dose warfarin baits to control wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Texas.

Authors:  Richard M Poché; David Poché; Greg Franckowiak; Daniel J Somers; Lindsay N Briley; Batchimeg Tseveenjav; Larisa Polyakova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Loci Associated With Antibody Response in Feral Swine (Sus scrofa) Infected With Brucella suis.

Authors:  Courtney F Pierce; Vienna R Brown; Steven C Olsen; Paola Boggiatto; Kerri Pedersen; Ryan S Miller; Scott E Speidel; Timothy J Smyser
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-25

6.  Infectious agents in feral swine in Ohio, USA (2009-2015): A low but evolving risk to agriculture and public health.

Authors:  Magaly Linares; Craig Hicks; Andrew S Bowman; Armando Hoet; Jason W Stull
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-12

7.  Vaccine safety studies of Brucella abortus S19 and S19ΔvjbR in pregnant swine.

Authors:  Slim Zriba; Daniel G Garcia-Gonzalez; Omar H Khalaf; Lance Wheeler; Sankar P Chaki; Allison Rice-Ficht; Thomas A Ficht; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2019-08-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.