| Literature DB >> 33213072 |
Nicolò Orsoni1, Francesca Degola1, Luca Nerva2,3, Franco Bisceglie1, Giorgio Spadola1, Walter Chitarra2,3, Valeria Terzi4, Stefano Delbono4, Roberta Ghizzoni4, Caterina Morcia4, Agnieszka Jamiołkowska5, Elżbieta Mielniczuk5, Francesco M Restivo1, Giorgio Pelosi1.
Abstract
As key players in biotic stress response of plants, jasmonic acid (JA) and its derivatives cover a specific and prominent role in pathogens-mediated signaling and hence are promising candidates for a sustainable management of phytopathogenic fungi. Recently, JA directed antimicrobial effects on plant pathogens has been suggested, supporting the theory of oxylipins as double gamers in plant-pathogen interaction. Based on these premises, six derivatives (dihydrojasmone and cis-jasmone, two thiosemicarbazonic derivatives and their corresponding complexes with copper) have been evaluated against 13 fungal species affecting various economically important herbaceous and woody crops, such as cereals, grapes and horticultural crops: Phaeoacremonium minimum, Neofusicoccum parvum, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Fomitiporia mediterranea, Fusarium poae, F. culmorum, F. graminearum, F. oxysporum f. sp. lactucae,F. sporotrichioides, Aspergillus flavus, Rhizoctonia solani,Sclerotinia spp. and Verticillium dahliae. The biological activity of these compounds was assessed in terms of growth inhibition and, for the two mycotoxigenic species A. flavus and F. sporotrichioides, also in terms of toxin containment. As expected, the inhibitory effect of molecules greatly varied amongst both genera and species; cis-jasmone thiosemicarbazone in particular has shown the wider range of effectiveness. However, our results show that thiosemicarbazones derivatives are more effective than the parent ketones in limiting fungal growth and mycotoxins production, supporting possible applications for the control of pathogenic fungi.Entities:
Keywords: crop protection; jasmone derivatives; jasmonic acid; mycopesticides; mycotoxins; phytopathogenic fungi; thiosemicarbazones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33213072 PMCID: PMC7698523 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Scheme 1Schematic representation of the structures of Jasmonic acid (JA) derivatives (J, Jdi), their thiosemicarbazones (JTS, JdiTS), and their copper complexes (JTS-Cu, JdiTS-Cu).
Figure 1(A) Overlapping of molecules A/B (left) and A/C (right). (B) Hydrogen bonding scheme between molecule A and B. (C) Hydrogen bond scheme along the ribbons formed by molecules A/B. (D) packing of the ribbons. Sulfur is represented in yellow, nitrogen in blue and carbon in gray.
The different hydrophobic chain dihedral angles for the three independent molecules.
|
|
|
|
| |
| C7–C8–C9–C10 | 138.9 (8)° | −125.1 (8)° | −130.9 (6)° | |
| C8–C9–C10–C11 | −4.3 (16)° | −2.0 (15)° | −2.0 (15)° | |
| C9–C10–C11–C12 | −153.6 (13)° | 134.3 (11)° | 123.9 (8)° |
Average bond lengths in the thiosemicarbazone moiety of the three molecules.
|
|
|
|
| C-N4 | 1.320 | |
| C-S | 1.695 | |
| C-N2 | 1.346 | |
| N2-N1 | 1.389 |
Figure 2Scavenging assay (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH)). The in vitro antioxidant ability of compounds is expressed as percentage of inhibition with respect to ascorbic acid 30 mM scavenging activity (100%).
Figure 3Effect of compounds on the growth of esca disease-linked species (A) P. minimum, (B) N. parvum, (C) P. chlamydospora and (D) F. mediterranea. Culture medium was amended with molecules at 25 μM concentration; values are reported as inhibition percentage as compared to the control (Dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO, 0.25% v/v amended cultures) ± S.D. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Effects of the compounds on the growth of cereals pathogenic fungi (A) F. poae, (B) F. culmorum, (C) F. graminearum, (D) F. sporotrichioides and (E) A. flavus. Culture medium was amended with an increasing concentration of molecules (from 5 to 100 µM) on the basis of the species; values are reported as inhibition percentage as compared to the control (DMSO amended cultures) ± S.D. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effect of compounds on the growth of horticultural crop pathogens (A) R. solani, (B) Sclerotinia spp., (C) V. dahliae and (D) F. oxysporum. Culture medium was amended with increasing concentrations of molecules (from 25 to 100 µM) on the basis of the species; values are reported as inhibition percentage as compared to the control (DMSO amended cultures) ± S.D. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Effect of compounds on the mycotoxin production in two cereals pathogenic fungi. Toxins T-2 and HT-2 were quantified in F. sporotrichioides cultures exposed to increasing concentration (from 1 to 25 µM) of J, JTS, Jdi and JdiTS compounds (A). Aflatoxins were quantified in A. flavus cultures exposed to increasing concentration (from 25 to 100 µM) of all the compounds (B). Values are reported as inhibition percentage as compared to the control (DMSO amended cultures) ± S.D. Asterisks or different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Effect of compounds on sclerotia biogenesis. Sclerotia biomass (A. flavus) or number (Sclerotinia spp.) was determined in cultures exposed to 100 µM concentration of compounds. Values are reported as inhibition percentage as compared to the control (DMSO amended cultures) ± S.D. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Compound | Inhibition (%) | Inhibition (%) |
| JTS | 71.9 ± 3.0 * | 55.3 ± 7.1 * |
| JTS-Cu | 96.9 ± 1.6 * | n.d. |
| JdiTS | 62.5 ± 5.7 * | 52.6 ± 3.5 * |
| JdiTS-Cu | 0.0 ± 0.2 | n.d. |