| Literature DB >> 28079180 |
Yongwen Lin1,2,3, Muhammad Qasim1,2,3, Mubasher Hussain1,2,3, Komivi Senyo Akutse2,3,4,5, Pasco Bruce Avery6, Chandra Kanta Dash1,2,3, Liande Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
Some herbivore-induced-plant volatiles (HIPVs) compounds are vital for the functioning of an ecosystem, by triggering multi-trophic interactions for natural enemies, plants and herbivores. However, the effect of these chemicals, which play a crucial role in regulating the multi-trophic interactions between plant-herbivore-entomopathogenic fungi, is still unknown. To fill this scientific gap, we therefore investigated how these chemicals influence the entomopathogenic fungi growth and efficacy. In this study, Lipaphis erysimi induced Arabidopsis thaliana HIPVs were collected using headspace system and detected with GC-MS, and then analyzed the effects of these HIPVs chemicals on Lecanicillium lecanii strain V3450. We found that the HIPVs menthol and methyl salicylate at 1 and 10 nmol·ml-1 improved many performance aspects of the fungus, such as germination, sporulation, appressorial formation as well as its pathogenicity and virulence. These findings are not only important for understanding the multi-trophic interactions in an ecosystem, but also would contribute for developing new and easier procedures for conidial mass production as well as improve the pathogenicity and virulence of entomopathogenic fungi in biological pest management strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28079180 PMCID: PMC5227919 DOI: 10.1038/srep40494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Quantities of major compounds in headspace volatiles released from A. thaliana infested by L. erysimi.
| Compounds | Quantities ± SD (nmol) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | |
| Limonene | 3.10 ± 0.06a | 3.80 ± 0.18a | 3.23 ± 0.09a | 3.05 ± 0.26a | 2.82 ± 0.52a |
| 2-Methyl-6-heptene | 4.98 ± 0.13a | 4.87 ± 0.23a | 5.10 ± 0.34a | 4.76 ± 0.29a | 4.94 ± 0.39a |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 1.44 ± 0.06a | 1.33 ± 0.08ab | 1.78 ± 0.15b | 1.46 ± 0.14ab | 1.57 ± 0.14ab |
| Menthol | 0.41 ± 0.02a | 0.47 ± 0.11a | 3.26 ± 0.17b | 3.68 ± 0.39b | 2.17 ± 0.19c |
| Methyl salicylate | Nd | 1.26 ± 0.05a | 3.23 ± 0.26b | 3.61 ± 0.35a | 4.52 ± 0.56b |
| Benzaldehyde | Nd | nd | 1.32 ± 0.25a | 1.38 ± 1.05a | 1.43 ± 0.12a |
| Phenylacetaldehyde | Nd | nd | 1.01 ± 0.04a | 1.07 ± 0.06a | 1.46 ± 0.13b |
| Decan-3-ol | Nd | nd | 1.06 ± 0.06a | 0.67 ± 0.08b | 1.29 ± 0.13a |
| Terpineols | Nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.77 ± 0.06 |
Data show mean values of quantities ± SD (nmol) of main compounds in headspace which were collected for 12 h. There were 0, 2, 5, 10, 20 L. erysimi in treatment I, II, III, IV, V, respectively. Means followed by a different letter per compound emitted across each row per treatment are significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.05). ‘nd’ means not detected.
The influence of headspace to conidial germination and appressorial rate.
| Treatments | Insect density | Germination rate % | Appressorial formation rate % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean value ± SE | confidence limited | mean value ± SE | confidence limited | ||
| I | 0 | 54.86 ± 1.61a | 57.59–65.79 | 5.06 ± 1.11a | 3.68-0.64 |
| II | 2 | 59.33 ± 2.16ab | 53.33–65.32 | 7.08 ± 1.87ab | 4.76-9.41 |
| III | 5 | 61.69 ± 1.48ab | 58.40–71.06 | 10.15–1.21b | 8.65–11.66 |
| IV | 10 | 67.22 ± 2.08bc | 61.44–73.01 | 13.97–1.20c | 12.48–15.47 |
| V | 20 | 64.7 ± 2.28bc | 50.38–59.33 | 8.49 ± 2.51b | 5.37–11.61 |
Data shows germination and appressorial formation rate mean mortality ± SE of 5 replicates 12 h exposure to headspace at 25 °C. The HIPVs was emitted from Aradopsis was induced by different densities of aphids. Means followed by the different letter are significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.05).
Analysis of correlation between the single HIPVs chemical and performance of conidia as influenced by HIPVs.
| Correlation analysis for germination rate and chemicals | Correlation analysis for appressorial formation rate and chemicals | |
|---|---|---|
| Limonene | 0.049 | −0.265 |
| 2-Methyl-6-heptene | −0.144 | −0.431 |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 0.173 | 0.285 |
| Menthol | 0.532 | 0.919 |
| Methyl salicylate | −0.070 | 0.705 |
| Benzaldehyde | 0.162 | 0.772 |
| Phenylacetaldehyde | −0.042 | 0.515 |
| Decan-3-ol | −0.132 | 0.504 |
| Terpineols | −0.782 | −0.077 |
Figure 1Germination and appressorial formation rate of L. lecanii treated with the different chemicals at different quantities for 12 h.
Chemicals used in the test were (I) menthol, (II) methyl salicylate and (III) decan-3-ol. The number ‘0’ on the y-axis is the control treatment. The bars indicate mean value of germination and appressorial formation rate and the error bars indicate ± standard error (n = 5). The different letters above the error bars on each side indicates significance (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05).
The hyphal growth of L. lecanii when exposed to the different chemical compounds at different concentrations.
| Series | Treatments | Fungal colony extension | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | Quantities (nmol·ml−1) | Speed (cm·d−1)* | Diameter (cm)*** | |
| 0 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 4.29 ± 0.21d | ||
| 1 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 5.39 ± 0.24a | ||
| I | Menthol | 10 | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 6.27 ± 0.11b |
| 100 | 0.71 ± 0.14 | 4.14 ± 0.09c | ||
| 1000 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 4.19 ± 0.06c | ||
| 0 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 4.29 ± 0.21d | ||
| 1 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 5.37 ± 0.13a | ||
| II | Methyl salicylate | 10 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 3.17 ± 0.08b |
| 100 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 1.58 ± 0.16c | ||
| 1000 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 1.14 ± 0.05c | ||
| 0 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 4.29 ± 0.21d | ||
| 1 | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 3.73 ± 0.12a | ||
| III | Decan-3-ol | 10 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 2.89 ± 0.07b |
| 100 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 1.62 ± 0.08c | ||
| 1000 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 1.37 ± 0.09c | ||
| 0 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 4.29 ± 0.21b | ||
| IV | Benzaldehye | 0.2 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 1.09 ± 0.04a |
| 2 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.77 ± 0.05a | ||
| V | Phenylacetaldehyde | 0 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 4.29 ± 0.21b |
| 0.2 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.76 ± 0.04a | ||
Data show mean value ± of the fungal colony of 5 replicates which cultured for 15 d. The number ‘0’ in all series are controlled treatments. Means followed by the different letter in a column are significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.05).
Figure 2Sporulation of L. lecanii after exposure to compounds for 15 days.
The chemicals which were used in the analysis are (I) menthol, (II) methyl salicylate, (III) decan-3-ol, (IV) benzaldehyde and (V) phenylacetaldehyde. The number ‘0’ on the x-axis is the control treatment. The bars indicate mean value of conidial concentration and error bars indicate a standard error (n = 5). The different letters above the error bars indicate significance (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05).
Pathogenicity of L. lecanii pre-treated by the different chemical in different quantities.
| Series | Treatments | Fungal pathogenicity to | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | Quantities (nmol·ml−1) | LT50 | 95% Confidence limits (lower-upper) | Mortality (%) | |
| 0 | 5.94 | 5.63–6.30 | 46.00 ± 2.67a | ||
| 1 | 4.94 | 4.68–5.23 | 49.33 ± 2.45a | ||
| I | Menthol | 10 | 4.57 | 4.34–4.81 | 73.33 ± 4.35b |
| 100 | 6.04 | 5.69–6.42 | 46.00 ± 3.23a | ||
| 1000 | 5.87 | 5.53–6.29 | 38.00 ± 2.00a | ||
| 0 | 5.94 | 5.63–6.30 | 46.00 ± 2.67ab | ||
| 1 | 5.05 | 4.80–5.34 | 62.00 ± 2.71c | ||
| II | Methyl salicylate | 10 | 6.30 | 5.91–6.80 | 50.0 0 ± 2.36ad |
| 100 | 7.08 | 6.55–7.79 | 37.32 ± 2.21be | ||
| 1000 | 7.60 | 6.95–8.53 | 32.00 ± 1.70e | ||
| 0 | 5.94 | 5.63–6.30 | 46.00 ± 2.67a | ||
| 1 | 6.05 | 5.71–6.46 | 36.67 ± 3.33a | ||
| III | Decan-3-ol | 10 | 6.62 | 6.24–7.12 | 35.33 ± 4.55a |
| 100 | 7.05 | 6.54–7.73 | 40.66 ± 3.71a | ||
| 1000 | 7.52 | 6.93–8.36 | 34.66 ± 3.42a | ||
| 0 | 5.94 | 5.63–6.30 | 46.00 ± 2.67a | ||
| IV | Benzaldehye | 0.2 | 7.32 | 6.79–8.04 | 42.67 ± 4.14a |
| 2 | 7.90 | 7.22–8.88 | 34.66 ± 2.67a | ||
| V | Phenylacetaldehyde | 0 | 5.94 | 5.63–6.30 | 46.00 ± 2.67a |
| 0.2 | 7.80 | 7.13–8.77 | 38.67 ± 3.43a | ||
Data shows LT50 value and percent mean mortality ± SE of 3 replicates 15 d post-exposure at 25 °C. LT50 were analyzed by linear regression. The number ‘0’ in the quantities column represent control treatments. Means followed by the different letter are significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.05).
Figure 3Diagrammatic sketch of headspace collecting system.
(A) pump; (B) flower meter; (C) air-purify cup; (D) glass jar; (E) absorbing column.