Literature DB >> 19818641

Learning thoracoscopic lobectomy.

René Horsleben Petersen1, Henrik Jessen Hansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Thoracoscopic (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)) lobectomy is a safe and effective method for treating early-stage lung cancer. Despite this, it is still not widely practised, which could be due to a shallow learning curve. We have evaluated the surgical outcome in a training programme at an institution with an established VATS lobectomy programme. We present the surgical data and outcome of the first 50 intended VATS lobectomies performed by a consultant in training as the primary surgeon.
METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospectively registered surgical database consisting of 262 consecutively intended VATS lobectomies. A single consultant performed 212 intended VATS lobectomies. His first 50 intended VATS lobectomies were excluded, as they were considered to be his learning curve, leaving 162 intended VATS lobectomies, of which 12 were converted to open lobectomy, performed from January 2005 to April 2008. Fifty intended VATS lobectomies were performed by a consultant in a training programme for VATS lobectomies, of which three were converted to open lobectomy from April 2007 to April 2008. The training consultant was experienced in open thoracic surgery and had performed more than 200 minor VATS procedures prior to the training programme. The surgical data and outcome between the 47 VATS lobectomies were compared with the 150 VATS lobectomies performed by the experienced consultant using statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There were significantly better results for the training consultant regarding prolonged air leak, chest tube duration and length of stay, which probably reflects the careful selection of the patients favouring the training consultant. The operation time was significant longer for the consultant in training (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: With careful selection of patients, VATS lobectomy can be taught safely in a surgical institution experienced in VATS lobectomies. Using statistical analysis, the surgical outcome for the training consultant was acceptable in comparison to the outcome of the experienced consultant. The consultant in training did spend more time in the operating theatre (p<0.0001) and we recommend taking that into account when planning future training programmes in VATS lobectomy. Copyright (c) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19818641     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  36 in total

1.  A new approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy "the caudal position".

Authors:  Giampiero Dolci; Andrea Dell'Amore; Niccolò Daddi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Training in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer M J Richards; Joel Dunning; William S Walker
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

3.  Pulmonary artery bleeding caused during VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  Joel Dunning; William S Walker
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  René H Petersen; Henrik J Hansen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Teaching video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Philip W Carrott; David R Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Is it safe to perform completion lobectomy after diagnostic wedge resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery?

Authors:  Bo Laksáfoss Holbek; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-25

7.  Development and validation of a theoretical test of proficiency for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Mona Meral Savran; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; William Walker; Thomas Schmid; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Society for Translational Medicine expert consensus on training and certification standards for surgeons and assistants in minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Lunxu Liu; Jiandong Mei; Jie He; Shugeng Gao; Shanqing Li; Jianxing He; Yunchao Huang; Shidong Xu; Weimin Mao; Qunyou Tan; Chun Chen; Xiaofei Li; Zhu Zhang; Gening Jiang; Lin Xu; Lanjun Zhang; Jianhua Fu; Hui Li; Qun Wang; Deruo Liu; Lijie Tan; Qinghua Zhou; Xiangning Fu; Zhongmin Jiang; Haiquan Chen; Wentao Fang; Xun Zhang; Yin Li; Ti Tong; Zhentao Yu; Yongyu Liu; Xiuyi Zhi; Tiansheng Yan; Xingyi Zhang; Todd L Demmy; Mark F Berry; Alexia Belén Gutierrez Pérez; Daniele Cataneo; Andrea Bille; Peter Licht; Gregor J Kocher; Murat Oncel; Serdar Evman; Katrine Jensen; Patrick Bagan; Raul Embun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: which is the learning curve of an experienced consultant?

Authors:  Antonio Mazzella; Anne Olland; Pierre Emmanuel Falcoz; Stephane Renaud; Nicola Santelmo; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  RATS: a word is enough to the wise.

Authors:  Daniel Valdivia; Khaled Mardanzai; Clemens Aigner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.