| Literature DB >> 33211710 |
L Ketema1, Z G Dememew1, D Assefa1, T Gudina2, A Kassa2, T Letta2, B Ayele2, Y Tadesse2, B Tegegn3, D G Datiko1, C Negeri1, A Bedru1, E Klinkenberg4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aligned with global childhood tuberculosis (TB) road map, Ethiopia developed its own in 2015. The key strategies outlined in the Ethiopian roadmap are incorporating TB screening in Integrated Maternal, Neonatal and Child Illnesses (IMNCI) clinic for children under five years (U5) and intensifying contact investigations at TB clinic. However, these strategies have never been evaluated.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33211710 PMCID: PMC7676707 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Schematic representation of the stepped wedge design of the implementation study in 30 health centers in Addis Ababa, August 2016-November 2017.
Fig 1 shows the four periods, each with the length of four months. The first period (August- November 2016) was the baseline period where all health facilities served as control. December 2016-March 2017 was phase I where the first group of 10 health facilities (phase I health facilities) were enrolled into intervention. During this phase the rest of 20 health facilities served as control in the control period. April-July 2017 was a period when the second group of 10 health facilities (phase II) were enrolled into intervention. Here, phase I &II health facilities served as intervention health facilities in the intervention period, whereas the remaining 10 health fasciitis (phase III facilities) served as a control in the control period. Finally, in August-November 2017 phase III facilities entered the intervention.
TB screening, identification of presumptive TB and TB cases, and contact investigation and TB preventive therapy efforts in the 30 study facilities in Addis Ababa Ethiopia, August 2016- November 2017.
| Ser No. | Variables | Overall frequency (proportion) | Control period Frequency (proportion) | Intervention period Frequency (proportion) | Two-sample test of proportion, p-value (intervention vs control period) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||
| 1.1 | Children in attendance | 181,455 | 85553 | 95902 | |
| 1.2 | Children screened for TB (proportion screened) | 145,862 (80.4%) | 52055 (60.80%) | 93807 (97.90%) | <0.001 |
| 1.3 | Presumptive cases identified (proportion from screened) | 739 (0.5%0 | 154 (0.3%) | 585 (0.6%) | <0.001 |
| 1.4 | NGA procedure carried out (proportion of those with presumptive TB) | 125 (1.0%) | 18 (11.7%) | 107(18.1%) | 0.06 |
| 1.5 | TB cases detected (proportion from presumed TB cases) | 59 (8.0%) | 11 (7.1%) | 48 (8.2%) | 0.66 |
| 2 | |||||
| 2.1 | children participated | 180,896 | 85278 | 95618 | |
| 2.2 | children screened for TB (proportion screened) | 145443 (80.4%) | 51873 (60.8%) | 93570 (97.9%) | <0.001 |
| 2.3 | presumptive cases identified (proportion from screened) | 688 (0.5%) | 149 (0.3%) | 539 (0.6%) | <0.001 |
| 2.4 | NGA procedure carried out (proportion of those with presumptive TB) | 105 (15.3%) | 18 (12.1%) | 87 (16.1%) | 0.22 |
| 2.5 | TB cases detected (proportion from presumed TB cases) | 47 (6.8%) | 9 (6.0%) | 38 (7.1%) | 0.67 |
| 3 | |||||
| 3.1 | Number of index cases | 1,603 | 684 | 919 | |
| 3.2 | U5 contact children traced | 559 | 275 | 284 | |
| 3.3 | contacts screened (proportion screened) | 419 (75.0%) | 182 (66.2%) | 237 (83.5%) | <0.001 |
| 3.4 | Presumptive TB cases identified (proportion from screened) | 51 (12.2%) | 5 (2.7%) | 46 (19.4%) | <0.001 |
| 3.5 | NGA procedure done (proportion of those with presumptive TB) | 20 (39.2%) | 0 (0%) | 20 (43.5%) | NA |
| 3.6 | TB cases detected (proportion from presumed TB cases) | 12 (23.5%) | 2 (40.0%) | 10 (21.7%) | 0.36 |
| 3.7 | Eligible U5 children eligible for IPT | 357 | 163 | 194 | NA |
| 3.8 | Children started on IPT (proportion from eligible) | 228 (63.9%) | 69 (42.3%) | 159 (82.0%) | <0.001 |
Fig 2Summary of the findings: TB screening, evaluation, and diagnosis at IMNCI; and contact tracing, screening, and initiation of TB preventive therapy at TB DOTS in Addis Abba Ethiopia, August 2016-November 2017.
Fig 2 shows the flow of TB screening and contact investigation activities based on the control and intervention period. For each period, there was TB activities at IMNCI and TB DOTs clinics. At IMNCI clinic, TB screening, identified presumed TB cases and TB cases were reported. At TB DOTS, number of index cases, contacts traced and screened, and IPT coverage were reported.
Comparison of TB activities during the pre-intervention/control and intervention period per the study facility in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, August 2016- November 2017.
| Ser No. | Variables | Mean Difference per study health facility (after and before intervention) | 95% Confidence Interval of mean difference | t-value | Sig. (2-tailed) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 1.1 | Total children involved | 172 | -128 | 471.7 | 1.1 | 0.26 |
| 1.2 | Total screened | 697.9 | 400.6 | 991.1 | 4.7 | |
| 1.3 | Total presumptive TB case | 7.6 | 5.1 | 10.03 | 6.04 | |
| 1.4 | Total NGA procedure done | 1.5 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 3.5 | |
| 1.5 | Total TB cases identified | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 4.3 | |
| 1.6 | % screened | 47.2 | 39.5 | 54.9 | 12.1 | |
| 2 | ||||||
| 2.1 | No of U5 (IMNCI) children involved | 172.3 | -127.1 | 471.7 | 1.1 | 0.26 |
| 2.2 | % screened at _IMNCI | 47.3 | 39.6 | 55 | 12.1 | |
| 2.3 | NGA done at IMNCI | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 2.9 | |
| 2.4 | TB cases at IMNCI | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 4 | |
| 3 | ||||||
| 3.1 | % Contact screened | 27.9 | 18.7 | 37 | 6.03 | |
| 3.2 | %IPT coverage | 42.2 | 27.8 | 56.6 | 5.8 | |
The assessment of feasibility of integrating TB screening and contact investigation activities into IMNCI and TB DOTS clinics, August 2016- November 2017 Addis Ababa.
| Ser No. | Feasibility | Clients who responded yes (N = 190) | Service providers who responded yes (N = 80) | Heads of the study health facilities who responded yes, (N = 30) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Satisfied with availability of TB screening and contact investigation services at the same place as IMNCI and TB DOTs services | 95.0 | 95.7 | 95.2 |
| 1.2 | Is it appropriate to integrate TB screening and contact investigation services with IMNCI and TB DOTs services | 94.7 | 90.9 | 100.0 |
| 1.3 | Perceived positive effects of integrated TB screening and contact investigation services on IMNCI and TB DOTs services | 94.4 | 95.2 | 100.0 |
| 2.1 | Is it practical to implement TB symptom screening, clinical evaluation, and treatment for TB | NA | 95.2 | 100 |
| 2.2 | Are the suggested process, tools, and SOPs for TB management in IMNCI and TB DOTs setting easy to adopt | NA | 94.7 | 100 |
| 2.3 | Is delivery of integrated TB services through IMNCI and TB DOTs sustainable considering cost and human resources? | NA | 86.4 | 89 |
| 2.4 | Do integrated TB screening and contact investigation services disrupt implementation of routine IMNCI and TB DOTs services? | NA | 14.3 | 17 |