Literature DB >> 33211237

Automated estimation of echocardiogram image quality in hospitalized patients.

Christina Luong1, Zhibin Liao2, Amir Abdi2, Purang Abolmaesumi2, Teresa S M Tsang3,4, Hany Girgis1, Robert Rohling2, Kenneth Gin1, John Jue1, Darwin Yeung1, Elena Szefer5, Darby Thompson5, Michael Yin-Cheung Tsang1, Pui Kee Lee1, Parvathy Nair1.   

Abstract

We developed a machine learning model for efficient analysis of echocardiographic image quality in hospitalized patients. This study applied a machine learning model for automated transthoracic echo (TTE) image quality scoring in three inpatient groups. Our objectives were: (1) Assess the feasibility of a machine learning model for echo image quality analysis, (2) Establish the comprehensiveness of real-world TTE reporting by clinical group, and (3) Determine the relationship between machine learning image quality and comprehensiveness of TTE reporting. A machine learning model was developed and applied to TTEs from three matched cohorts for image quality of nine standard views. Case TTEs were comprehensive studies in mechanically ventilated patients between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2015. For each case TTE, there were two matched spontaneously breathing controls (Control 1: Inpatients scanned in the lab and Control 2: Portable studies). We report the overall mean maximum and view specific quality scores for each TTE. The comprehensiveness of an echo report was calculated as the documented proportion of 12 standard parameters. An inverse probability weighted regression model was fit to determine the relationship between machine learning quality score and the completeness of a TTE report. 175 mechanically ventilated TTEs were included with 350 non-intubated samples (175 Control 1: Lab and 175 Control 2: Portable). In total, the machine learning model analyzed 14,086 echo video clips for quality. The overall accuracy of the model with regard to the expert ground truth for the view classification was 87.0%. The overall mean maximum quality score was lower for mechanically ventilated TTEs (0.55 [95% CI 0.54, 0.56]) versus 0.61 (95% CI 0.59, 0.62) for Control 1: Lab and 0.64 (95% CI 0.63, 0.66) for Control 2: Portable; p = 0.002. Furthermore, mechanically ventilated TTE reports were the least comprehensive, with fewer reported parameters. The regression model demonstrated the correlation of echo image quality and completeness of TTE reporting regardless of the clinical group. Mechanically ventilated TTEs were of inferior quality and clinical utility compared to spontaneously breathing controls and machine learning derived image quality correlates with completeness of TTE reporting regardless of the clinical group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Echocardiography; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33211237     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01981-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  16 in total

1.  The segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from ultrasound data using deep learning architectures and derivative-based search methods.

Authors:  Gustavo Carneiro; Jacinto C Nascimento; António Freitas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Automatic Quality Assessment of Echocardiograms Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Feasibility on the Apical Four-Chamber View.

Authors:  Amir H Abdi; Christina Luong; Teresa Tsang; Gregory Allan; Saman Nouranian; John Jue; Dale Hawley; Sarah Fleming; Ken Gin; Jody Swift; Robert Rohling; Purang Abolmaesumi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Automatic apical view classification of echocardiograms using a discriminative learning dictionary.

Authors:  Hanan Khamis; Grigoriy Zurakhov; Vered Azar; Adi Raz; Zvi Friedman; Dan Adam
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Machine-Learning Algorithms to Automate Morphological and Functional Assessments in 2D Echocardiography.

Authors:  Sukrit Narula; Khader Shameer; Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar; Joel T Dudley; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Phenomapping for the Identification of Hypertensive Patients with the Myocardial Substrate for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Daniel H Katz; Rahul C Deo; Frank G Aguilar; Senthil Selvaraj; Eva E Martinez; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Jie Peng; Marguerite R Irvin; Hemant Tiwari; D C Rao; Donna K Arnett; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Support vector machine-based arrhythmia classification using reduced features of heart rate variability signal.

Authors:  Babak Mohammadzadeh Asl; Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan; Maryam Mohebbi
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Influence of image quality on the accuracy of real time three-dimensional echocardiography to measure left ventricular volumes in unselected patients: a comparison with gated-SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Dennis A Tighe; Mihaela Rosetti; Craig S Vinch; Dinesh Chandok; Diane Muldoon; Barbara Wiggin; Seth T Dahlberg; Gerard P Aurigemma
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.724

9.  Cognitive Machine-Learning Algorithm for Cardiac Imaging: A Pilot Study for Differentiating Constrictive Pericarditis From Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Partho P Sengupta; Yen-Min Huang; Manish Bansal; Ali Ashrafi; Matt Fisher; Khader Shameer; Walt Gall; Joel T Dudley
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Fully Automated Echocardiogram Interpretation in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey Zhang; Sravani Gajjala; Pulkit Agrawal; Geoffrey H Tison; Laura A Hallock; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Mats H Lassen; Eugene Fan; Mandar A Aras; ChaRandle Jordan; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Michelle Melisko; Atif Qasim; Sanjiv J Shah; Ruzena Bajcsy; Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiographic Left Atrial Volume Measurement with Pulmonary Vein Comparison.

Authors:  Mengyun Zhu; Ximin Fan; Weijing Liu; Jianying Shen; Wei Chen; Yawei Xu; Xuejing Yu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.