Literature DB >> 33210336

Estimation of differential occupational risk of COVID-19 by comparing risk factors with case data by occupational group.

Michael Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The disease burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not uniform across occupations. Although healthcare workers are well-known to be at increased risk, data for other occupations are lacking. In lieu of this, models have been used to forecast occupational risk using various predictors, but no model heretofore has used data from actual case numbers. This study assesses the differential risk of COVID-19 by occupation using predictors from the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) database and correlating them with case counts published by the Washington State Department of Health to identify workers in individual occupations at highest risk of COVID-19 infection.
METHODS: The O*NET database was screened for potential predictors of differential COVID-19 risk by occupation. Case counts delineated by occupational group were obtained from public sources. Prevalence by occupation was estimated and correlated with O*NET data to build a regression model to predict individual occupations at greatest risk.
RESULTS: Two variables correlate with case prevalence: disease exposure (r = 0.66; p = 0.001) and physical proximity (r = 0.64; p = 0.002), and predict 47.5% of prevalence variance (p = 0.003) on multiple linear regression analysis. The highest risk occupations are in healthcare, particularly dental, but many nonhealthcare occupations are also vulnerable.
CONCLUSIONS: Models can be used to identify workers vulnerable to COVID-19, but predictions are tempered by methodological limitations. Comprehensive data across many states must be collected to adequately guide implementation of occupation-specific interventions in the battle against COVID-19.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; infection control; occupational medicine; preventive medicine; workplace safety

Year:  2020        PMID: 33210336     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  29 in total

1.  A compelling demonstration of why traditional statistical regression models cannot be used to identify risk factors from case data on infectious diseases: a simulation study.

Authors:  Solveig Engebretsen; Gunnar Rø; Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.612

2.  Prophylaxis in healthcare workers during a pandemic: a model for a multi-centre international randomised controlled trial using Bayesian analyses.

Authors:  Pepa Bruce; Kate Ainscough; Lee Hatter; Irene Braithwaite; Lindsay R Berry; Mark Fitzgerald; Thomas Hills; Kathy Brickell; David Cosgrave; Alex Semprini; Susan Morpeth; Scott Berry; Peter Doran; Paul Young; Richard Beasley; Alistair Nichol
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Efficacy of dental evacuation systems for aerosol exposure mitigation in dental clinic settings.

Authors:  Brie Hawley Blackley; Kimberly R Anderson; Fotinos Panagakos; Tammy Chipps; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Transit Workers: Perceptions of Employer Responses and Associations with Health Factors.

Authors:  Sean P M Rice; Leah S Greenspan; Talya N Bauer; Jarred Rimby; Todd E Bodner; Ryan Olson
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.779

5.  Essential work, precarious labour: The need for safer and equitable harm reduction work in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Michelle Olding; Allison Barker; Ryan McNeil; Jade Boyd
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-12-10

6.  Estimated N95 Respirator Needs for Nonhealthcare Essential Workers in the United States During Communicable Respiratory Infectious Disease Pandemics.

Authors:  Ethan D Fechter-Leggett; Kathleen B Fedan; Jean M Cox-Ganser; Martin I Meltzer; Bishwa B Adhikari; Chad H Dowell
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Occupation and COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation and ICU admission among foreign-born and Swedish-born employees: a register-based study.

Authors:  Chioma Adanma Nwaru; Ailiana Santosa; Stefan Franzén; Fredrik Nyberg
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Reasons for Low Protection of Vulnerable Workers from COVID-19-Results from the Quantitative and Qualitative Study on Working Life in Latvia.

Authors:  Linda Matisāne; Linda Paegle; Maija Eglīte; Lāsma Akūlova; Asnate Anna Linde; Ivars Vanadziņš; Iveta Mietule; Jeļena Lonska; Lienīte Litavniece; Iluta Arbidāne; Sarmīte Rozentāle; Ieva Grīntāle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Influence of Socioeconomic Status on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Spanish Pregnant Women. The MOACC-19 Cohort.

Authors:  Javier Llorca; Carolina Lechosa-Muñiz; Lorena Lasarte-Oria; Rocío Cuesta-González; Marcos López-Hoyos; Pilar Gortázar; Inés Gómez-Acebo; Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos; María J Cabero-Pérez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  COVID-19 Surveillance and Investigations in Workplaces - Seattle & King County, Washington, June 15-November 15, 2020.

Authors:  Jesse Bonwitt; Ruth W Deya; Dustin W Currie; Beth Lipton; Melinda Huntington-Frazier; Sara Jaye Sanford; Aley Joseph Pallickaparambil; Julia Hood; Agam K Rao; Kaitlin Kelly-Reif; Sara E Luckhaupt; Sargis Pogosjans; Scott Lindquist; Jeff Duchin; Vance Kawakami
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 17.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.