Wei-An Lai1, Pang-Hsu Liu1, Ming-Jen Tsai1, Ying Chieh Huang1,2. 1. Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine Chiayi City Taiwan. 2. Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical Center and School of Medicine Kaohsiung Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) use in injured patients has continuously increased in the past decades. We designed and undertook this study to evaluate the frequency, and potential risks of incidental findings (IFs), and how they were processed in trauma patients receiving CT scans. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed CT scans, official CT reports, and basic demographics in trauma patients who received CT scans at our emergency department in 2016. Scans with IFs prompted a detailed review of medical records to determine clinical significance and how they were processed. IFs were classified into three categories: category I (potentially severe condition, in-time management required), category II (not urgent, follow-up needed), and category III (of minor concern). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine patient characteristics associated with IFs. RESULTS: In the 4,092 scans enrolled, IFs were identified in 649 (15.9%). There were 13 (2.0%) category I, 306 (47.2%) category II, and 330 (50.8%) category III IFs. Patients with IFs were older than those without. No sex-based difference was found. Most (61.5%) of the scans were performed for the head; however, the abdomen had the highest IF prevalence (26.2%). Documentation about IFs was poor; 31% of category I, 91.9% of category II, and 97.0% of category III have no related record. Old age remains the risk predicting the presence of IFs, and every year of increasing age was independently associated with a higher prevalence of IFs (OR: 1.019; 95% CI: 1.015-1.024). CONCLUSIONS: IFs are common in trauma CT scans; however, recognition and management remain poor. Abdomen and chest scans, and CT in older patients should remind us of increasing risks of IFs.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) use in injured patients has continuously increased in the past decades. We designed and undertook this study to evaluate the frequency, and potential risks of incidental findings (IFs), and how they were processed in trauma patients receiving CT scans. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed CT scans, official CT reports, and basic demographics in trauma patients who received CT scans at our emergency department in 2016. Scans with IFs prompted a detailed review of medical records to determine clinical significance and how they were processed. IFs were classified into three categories: category I (potentially severe condition, in-time management required), category II (not urgent, follow-up needed), and category III (of minor concern). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine patient characteristics associated with IFs. RESULTS: In the 4,092 scans enrolled, IFs were identified in 649 (15.9%). There were 13 (2.0%) category I, 306 (47.2%) category II, and 330 (50.8%) category III IFs. Patients with IFs were older than those without. No sex-based difference was found. Most (61.5%) of the scans were performed for the head; however, the abdomen had the highest IF prevalence (26.2%). Documentation about IFs was poor; 31% of category I, 91.9% of category II, and 97.0% of category III have no related record. Old age remains the risk predicting the presence of IFs, and every year of increasing age was independently associated with a higher prevalence of IFs (OR: 1.019; 95% CI: 1.015-1.024). CONCLUSIONS: IFs are common in trauma CT scans; however, recognition and management remain poor. Abdomen and chest scans, and CT in older patients should remind us of increasing risks of IFs.
Authors: Raoul van Vugt; Helena M Dekker; Jaap Deunk; Rozemarijn J van der Vijver; Arie B van Vugt; Digna R Kool; Monique Brink; Michael J R Edwards Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: D Dante Yeh; Ayesha M Imam; Shani H Truong; Erin L McLaughlin; Eric N Klein; Laura L Avery; George C Velmahos Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Sandra Niedermeier; Rebecca Wania; Alina Lampart; Robert Stahl; Christoph Trumm; Christian Kammerlander; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian H Nickel; Roland Bingisser; Marco Armbruster; Vera Pedersen Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-01-30