| Literature DB >> 33205255 |
Rebekka Medert1,2, Andy Pironet3, Lucas Bacmeister1,2, Sebastian Segin1,2, Juan E Camacho Londoño1,2, Rudi Vennekens3, Marc Freichel4,5.
Abstract
Transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (TRPM4) cation channels act in cardiomyocytes as a negative modulator of the L-type Ca2+ current. Ubiquitous Trpm4 deletion in mice leads to an increased β-adrenergic inotropy in healthy mice as well as after myocardial infarction. In this study, we set out to investigate cardiac inotropy in mice with cardiomyocyte-specific Trpm4 deletion. The results guided us to investigate the relevance of TRPM4 for catecholamine-evoked Ca2+ signaling in cardiomyocytes and inotropy in vivo in TRPM4-deficient mouse models of different genetic background. Cardiac hemodynamics were investigated using pressure-volume analysis. Surprisingly, an increased β-adrenergic inotropy was observed in global TRPM4-deficient mice on a 129SvJ genetic background, but the inotropic response was unaltered in mice with global and cardiomyocyte-specific TRPM4 deletion on the C57Bl/6N background. We found that the expression of TRPM4 proteins is about 78 ± 10% higher in wild-type mice on the 129SvJ versus C57Bl/6N background. In accordance with contractility measurements, our analysis of the intracellular Ca2+ transients revealed an increase in ISO-evoked Ca2+ rise in Trpm4-deficient cardiomyocytes of the 129SvJ strain, but not of the C57Bl/6N strain. No significant differences were observed between the two mouse strains in the expression of other regulators of cardiomyocyte Ca2+ homeostasis. We conclude that the relevance of TRPM4 for cardiac contractility depends on homeostatic TRPM4 expression levels or the genetic endowment in different mouse strains as well as on the health/disease status. Therefore, the concept of inhibiting TRPM4 channels to improve cardiac contractility needs to be carefully explored in specific strains and species and prospectively in different genetically diverse populations of patients.Entities:
Keywords: 129SvJ; C57Bl/6N; Cardiac contractility; Cardiomyocyte specific deletion; Catecholamine; Genetic background; Inotropic response; TRPM4; Transient receptor potential (TRP) channel
Year: 2020 PMID: 33205255 PMCID: PMC7671982 DOI: 10.1007/s00395-020-00831-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Res Cardiol ISSN: 0300-8428 Impact factor: 17.165
Primer sets for genotyping
| Allele | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
| Trpm4 WT | 5´ GTTTGATGTCTCCTTCAGTCG 3´ 5´ ACCTACAGGAAACCTCGGGG 3´ |
| Trpm4 – | 5´ GTTTGATGTCTCCTTCAGTCG 3´ 5´ GAGTTCCTGTCCTCCTAAAGG 3´ |
| Trpm4flox | 5´ GTTTGATGTCTCCTTCAGTCG 3´ 5´ ACCTACAGGAAACCTCGGGG 3´ |
| αMHC-CreERT2 | 5´ TTATGGTACCACATAGACCTCT 3´ 5´ TGCTGTTGGATGGTCTTCACAG 3´ |
Fig. 1Protein expression analysis of TRPM4 in adult Trpm4flox/flox; αMHC-CreERT2 mice and constitutive Trpm4-deficient mice on the genetic C57Bl/6N or 129SvJ background. a Western blots (left) with anti-TRPM4 and anti-GAPDH, 10 weeks after tamoxifen treatment; right panel: Analysis of the relative expression analysis shows a TRPM4 reduction of 78 ± 10% in the heart of Trpm4flox/flox; αMHC-CreERT2 pos. animals. Microsomal membrane fractions from n = 4 independent Cre negative and Cre positive mice were analyzed. b Western blot analysis with anti-TRPM4, anti-SERCA2a, anti-Cavβ2 and anti-GAPDH in globally Trpm4–/–(Bl/6N) (n = 4) and Trpm4–/–(129SvJ) (n = 3) mice compared to Trpm4+/+(Bl/6N) (n = 4) and Trpm4+/+(SvJ) (n = 3) littermate controls. Relative expression of TRPM4 (c), Cavβ2 (d) and SERCA2a (e). Trpm4+/+(Bl/6N) Values are expressed as means ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 2Measurement of cardiac function of inducible and cardiomyocyte-specific TRPM4-deficient mice on the C57Bl/6N genetic background. Representative pressure–Volume loops under basal conditions and β-adrenergic stimulation of a Trpm4flox/flox/αMHC-CreERT2 negative (n = 4) and b Trpm4flox/flox/αMHC-CreERT2 positive (n = 6) littermates. Statistical analysis of isoproterenol dose–response curves of c heart rate, d stroke volume, e stroke work and f PRSW (Preload-Recruitable-Stroke Work). Values are expressed as means ± SEM
Hemodynamic analysis of inducible cardiomyocyte-specific Trpm4flox/flox; αMHC-CreERT2 mice. Creneg, n = 4; Crepos, n = 6
| C57Bl/6N | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isoproterenol (ng/kg/min) | 0 | 9 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 300 | ||||||
| Genotype: Trpm4flox/flox | Cre- | Cre + | Cre- | Cre + | Cre- | Cre + | Cre- | Cre + | Cre- | Cre + | Cre- | Cre + |
| HR (b/min) | 479 ± 16 | 478 ± 12 | 487 ± 18 | 484 ± 13 | 559 ± 10 | 548 ± 15 | 638 ± 15 | 641 ± 12 | 677 ± 17 | 694 ± 5 | 696 ± 9 | 707 ± 5 |
| SV (µl) | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 9.3 ± 1.0 | 10.2 ± 0.5 | 9.4 ± 1.0 | 12.0 ± 0.9 | 11.3 ± 0.8 | 14.7 ± 1.2 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 15.5 ± 1.7 | 14.3 ± 1.0 | 15.9 ± 1.5 | 14.6 ± 1.1 |
| CO (µl/min) | 4604 ± 214 | 4392 ± 450 | 4967 ± 312 | 4515 ± 445 | 6704 ± 451 | 6190 ± 491 | 9325 ± 641 | 8529 ± 406 | 10,460 ± 1071 | 9943 ± 635 | 11,075 ± 1083 | 10,298 ± 822 |
| Ved (µl) | 26.6 ± 3.5 | 23.2 ± 2.5 | 25.9 ± 3.2 | 22.9 ± 2.4 | 22.0 ± 2.7 | 18.6 ± 2.0 | 17.9 ± 2.1 | 15.1 ± 1.7 | 16.9 ± 2.1 | 14.0 ± 1.8 | 16.8 ± 2.0 | 14.5 ± 1.8 |
| Ves (µl) | 18.3 ± 3.7 | 15 ± 9 | 17.6 ± 3.3 | 15.5 ± 2.4 | 11.7 ± 2.3 | 9.5 ± 2.3 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | 2.6 ± 1.7 | 2.2 ± 1.0 | 1.4 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 1.3 | 1.6 ± 1.2 |
| Ped (mmHg) | 3.7 ± 1.0 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 4.2 ± 1.9 | 2.5 ± 1.1 |
| Systolic parameters | ||||||||||||
| SW (mmHg*s) | 489 ± 7 | 464 ± 79 | 511 ± 12 | 463 ± 66 | 689 ± 68 | 585 ± 67 | 864 ± 102 | 717 ± 59 | 892 ± 93 | 812 ± 75 | 937 ± 99 | 862 ± 98 |
| dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 393 ± 229 | 3711 ± 196 | 4113 ± 316 | 3800 ± 160 | 5648 ± 361 | 4862 ± 394 | 8205 ± 964 | 6768 ± 234 | 9733 ± 465 | 9015 ± 280 | 11,763 ± 1303 | 10,241 ± 449 |
| PRSW (mmHg) | 65.0 ± 0.9 | 58.0 ± 0.9 | 62.6 ± 1.4 | 62.3 ± 1.2 | 75.1 ± 1.0 | 75.5 ± 1.0 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 79.4 ± 1.0 | 78.9 ± 0.7 | 83.2 ± 0.5 | 77.1 ± 0.6 | 83.5 ± 0.2 |
| Diastolic parameters | ||||||||||||
| -dP/dtmin (mmHg/s) | – 4827 ± 417 | – 4467 ± 211 | – 5012 ± 571 | – 4686 ± 228 | – 6657 ± 1048 | – 5492 ± 365 | – 6643 ± 587 | – 5994 ± 541 | – 5969 ± 532 | – 6289 ± 569 | – 7793 ± 1491 | – 6488 ± 526 |
| Tau (ms) | 8.3 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.2 |
HR, heart rate; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; Ved, end-diastolic volume; Ves, end-systolic volume; Ped, end-diastolic pressure; SW, stroke work; dP/dtmax, peak rate of pressure rise; -dP/dtmin, peak rate of pressure decline; PRSW, preload recruited stroke work; Tau, relaxation time constant (Weiss method). Values are expressed as means ± SEM
Fig. 3Measurement of cardiac function in global TRPM4 knockout mice on the C57Bl/6N genetic background. Representative pressure–Volume loops under basal conditions and β-adrenergic stimulation of a Trpm4+/+(Bl/6N) mice (n = 8) and b Trpm4–/– (Bl/6N) (n = 7) littermates. Statistical analysis of isoproterenol dose–response curves of c heart rate, d stroke volume, e stroke work and f PRSW (Preload-Recruitable-Stroke Work). Values are expressed as means ± SEM
Hemodynamic analysis of constitutively TRPM4-deficient mice on the genetic C57Bl/6 N background. TRPM4+/+, n = 8; TRPM4−/−, n = 7
| C57Bl/6N | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isoproterenol (ng/kg/min) | 0 | 9 | 30 | 90 | 300 | |||||
| Genotype: Trpm4 | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- |
| HR (b/min) | 473 ± 7 | 448 ± 10 | 484 ± 8 | 464 ± 7.5 | 575 ± 12 | 556 ± 4 | 657 ± 8 | 635 ± 8 | 685 ± 4 | 683 ± 6.4 |
| SV (µl) | 15.5 ± 0.7 | 15.2 ± 0.7 | 14.9 ± 0.9 | 18.0 ± 1.2 | 19.9 ± 1.1 | 22.1 ± 1.3 | 20.9 ± 1.5 | 23.4 ± 2.1 | 20.6 ± 1.5 | 22.8 ± 2.3 |
| CO (µl/min) | 7305 ± 377 | 6786 ± 29 | 7377 ± 495 | 8332 ± 618 | 11,423 ± 699 | 12,295 ± 102 | 13,716 ± 892 | 14,897 ± 1398 | 14,108 ± 1052 | 15,639 ± 1664 |
| Ved (µl) | 33.7 ± 1.6 | 37.7 ± 2.4 | 33.1 ± 2.0 | 37.2 ± 2.0 | 25.2 ± 2.2 | 28.4 ± 3.0 | 21.5 ± 1.8 | 24.0 ± 2.3 | 21.6 ± 1.6 | 23.5 ± 2.0 |
| Ves (µl) | 21.8 ± 1.4 | 26.8 ± 2.1 | 21.0 ± 1.9 | 24.0 ± 1.3 | 6.7 ± 2.1 | 8.0 ± 1.7 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.9 |
| Ped (mmHg) | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 5.3 ± 1.4 | 5.0 ± 0.7 |
| Systolic parameters | ||||||||||
| SW (mmHg*s) | 721 ± 48 | 643 ± 29 | 723 ± 57 | 810 ± 88 | 1005 ± 93 | 1186 ± 102 | 1135 ± 101 | 1386 ± 133 | 1139 ± 109 | 1464 ± 180 |
| dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 3580 ± 169 | 2897 ± 104 | 3654 ± 206 | 3547 ± 321 | 5853 ± 573 | 5471 ± 344 | 8803 ± 481 | 7913 ± 485 | 9698 ± 467 | 9668 ± 438 |
| PRSW (mmHg) | 70.2 ± 3.7 | 70.2 ± 4.9 | 71.1 ± 2.0 | 75.0 ± 4.0 | 82.7 ± 4.1 | 77.1 ± 4.7 | 83.8 ± 4.2 | 84.4 ± 5.9 | 90.2 ± 5.5 | 89.1 ± 6.2 |
| Diastolic parameters | ||||||||||
| dP/dtmin (mmHg) | -4061 ± 224 | -3182 ± 153 | -4082 ± 223 | -3854 ± 302 | -4907 ± 251 | -5308 ± 220 | -5690 ± 270 | -5708 ± 375 | -6766 ± 418 | -6445 ± 478 |
| Tau (ms) | 9.0 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 0.4 | 8.7 ± 0.4 | 8.7 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.3 |
HR, heart rate; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; Ved, end-diastolic volume; Ves, end-systolic volume; Ped, end-diastolic pressure; SW, stroke work; dP/dtmax, peak rate of pressure rise; -dP/dtmin, peak rate of pressure decline; PRSW, preload recruited stroke work; Tau, relaxation time constant (Weiss method). Values are expressed as means ± SEM
Fig. 4Measurement of cardiac function in global TRPM4 knockout mice on the 129SvJ genetic background. Representative pressure–Volume loops under basal conditions and β-adrenergic stimulation of a Trpm4+/+(129SvJ) mice (n = 7) and b Trpm4–/–(129SvJ) (n = 6) littermates. Statistical analysis of isoproterenol dose–response curves of c heart rate, d stroke volume, e stroke work and f PRSW (Preload-Recruitable-Stroke Work). Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Hemodynamic analysis of constitutively TRPM4-deficient mice on the genetic 129SvJ background. TRPM4+/+, n = 7; TRPM4−/−, n = 6
| 129SvJ | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isoproterenol (ng/kg/min) | 0 | 9 | 30 | 90 | 300 | |||||
| Genotype: Trpm4 | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- | + / + | -/- |
| HR (b/min) | 471.9 ± 2 | 477 ± 11 | 488 ± 6 | 492 ± 10 | 531 ± 9 | 526 ± 15 | 592 ± 10 | 590 ± 19 | 650 ± 8.3 | 634 ± 31 |
| SV (µl) | 20.2 ± 2.0 | 21.6 ± 0.9 | 21.6 ± 2.5 | 24.9 ± 1.5 | 24.5 ± 2.5 | 29.2 ± 1.8 | 26.1 ± 2.3 | 26.2 ± 2.5 | ||
| CO (µl/min) | 9500 ± 931.3 | 10,338 ± 610 | 11,500 ± 1505 | 12,249 ± 824 | 14,310 ± 1895 | 15,408 ± 1246 | 17,111 ± 272 | 19,257 ± 888 | 19,068 ± 309 | 21,784 ± 530 |
| Ved (µl) | 37.0 ± 4.1 | 40.4 ± 1.7 | 36.4 ± 4.6 | 42.8 ± 2.3 | 35.1 ± 3.7 | 39.4 ± 2.5 | 30.8 ± 3.8 | 34.8 ± 2.2 | 30.8 ± 4.0 | 35.4 ± 1.8 |
| Ves (µl) | 19.1 ± 2.5 | 23.0 ± 2.6 | 15.4 ± 2.6 | 20.8 ± 8 | 10.7 ± 2.2 | 12.8 ± 2.9 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.4 |
| Ped (mmHg) | 7.8 ± 1.1 | 6.3 ± 0.8 | 8.1 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 1.4 | 6.9 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 0.8 | 6.4 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 2.0 | 6.8 ± 0.6 | 8.4 ± 2.4 |
| Systolic parameters | ||||||||||
| SW (mmHg*s) | 1283 ± 169 | 1366 ± 108 | 1566 ± 235 | 1690 ± 104 | 1759 ± 265 | 1969 ± 202 | 1974 ± 272 | 2262 ± 147 | 2101 ± 309 | 2574 ± 198 |
| dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 6369 ± 542 | 6372 ± 642 | 7866 ± 762 | 7679 ± 577 | 9259 ± 1067 | 10,067 ± 1363 | 12,057 ± 1134 | 12,341 ± 652 | 14,107 ± 1026 | 15,189 ± 1227 |
| PRSW (mmHg) | 71.3 ± 2.5 | 81.8 ± 4.9 | 71.3 ± 5.0 | 80.1 ± 5.1 | 79.3 ± 5.9 | 94 ± 5.4 | 93.2 ± 4.5 | 97.7 ± 3.0 | ||
| Diastolic parameters | ||||||||||
| dP/dtmin (mmHg) | -6369 ± 542 | -6513 ± 577 | -7089 ± 762 | -7338 ± 413 | -7191 ± 713 | -7517 ± 735 | -6359 ± 756 | -6218 ± 284 | -7111 ± 627 | -6020 ± 324 |
| Tau (ms) | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 6.1 ± 0.3 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.4 ± 0.4 |
Significant differences between TRM4+/+and TRPM4-/-are indicated as bold values
HR, heart rate; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; Ved, end-diastolic volume; Ves, end-systolic volume; Ped, end-diastolic pressure; SW, stroke work; dP/dtmax, peak rate of pressure rise; -dP/dtmin, peak rate of pressure decline; PRSW, preload recruited stroke work; Tau, relaxation time constant (Weiss method). Values are expressed as means ± SEM
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 5Analysis of Ca2+ transient in cardiomyocytes from Trpm4+/+ and Trpm4−/− mice on the C57Bl/6N (a–e) or 129SvJ (f–j) background. (a–b) representative examples illustrating the time-course of experiments to test the effect of isoprenaline (1 µM) on electrically evoked Ca2+ transients (5 Hz). After the application of isoprenaline, the pacing was seized and cells were stimulated with caffeine (10 mM) to induce Ca2+ release. Analysis of the basal amplitude of electrically-evoked Ca2+ transients (c), the relative effect of isoprenaline (d) and the amplitude of the caffeine evoked transient (e) in cells from Trpm4+/+ and Trpm4−/− cardiomyocytes from C57Bl/6 N mice. f–j show similar experiments but from cardiomyocytes from 129SvJ mice. Amplitudes of Ca2+ transients were calculated as follows: F2 represents the peak of the Ca2+ transient, F1 is the base of the Ca2+ transient, and F0 is the fluorescence value in a resting cell, before the cell is stimulated. Thus (F2-F1)/F0 gives the net amplitude of the Ca2+ transients normalized to the loading of the cell (F0). In all our traces background fluorescence (fluorescence value of a cell-free field) is subtracted from the data. Each data point represents averaged values from cells of biologically independent mice (10 WT and 9 KO animals on C57Bl/6N and 8 WT and 10 KO animals on 129SvJ background. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. **p < 0.01