Samuel Kent1. 1. Maxillofacial Surgery Trainees Research Collaborative (MTReC), Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK. sjwkent@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Defining current inpatient management of cervicofacial infections is key to identifying strategies to optimise care. Steroid use is beneficial in peritonsillar and orbital abscess, but there are few studies of steroid use in odontogenic cervicofacial infections. Our previous research identified widespread variation in practice, necessitating a national audit to define current practice. METHODS: A multicentre, trainee-led snapshot audit was carried out across 25 hospitals in the UK. Information recorded included demographic features, presentation, surgical and medical management, and steroid administration. RESULTS: One thousand two admissions were recorded. Fifty-five percent were male, with mean age 37.3 years (range 0-94 years). Steroids were administered to 357 patients (36%), 159 of whom received steroids on admission, and 254 peri-operatively. Patients who were prescribed steroids had significantly higher white cell count (12.4 vs 11.5), CRP (79.5 vs 57) and heart rate (94 vs 88) on admission. Justifications given for administration included swelling (74), dysphagia (21), and airway compromise (7). Three patients (0.8%) reported steroid-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study uses the largest recorded cohort of cervicofacial infections to define current inpatient steroid administration. Our results suggest that steroids are targeted towards the most compromised 1/3 of patients. The incidence of steroid-related side effects was low. Defining the characteristics of patients currently receiving steroids will aid in determining whether steroid administration is an effective adjunct in treating odontogenic cervicofacial infection.
INTRODUCTION: Defining current inpatient management of cervicofacial infections is key to identifying strategies to optimise care. Steroid use is beneficial in peritonsillar and orbital abscess, but there are few studies of steroid use in odontogenic cervicofacial infections. Our previous research identified widespread variation in practice, necessitating a national audit to define current practice. METHODS: A multicentre, trainee-led snapshot audit was carried out across 25 hospitals in the UK. Information recorded included demographic features, presentation, surgical and medical management, and steroid administration. RESULTS: One thousand two admissions were recorded. Fifty-five percent were male, with mean age 37.3 years (range 0-94 years). Steroids were administered to 357 patients (36%), 159 of whom received steroids on admission, and 254 peri-operatively. Patients who were prescribed steroids had significantly higher white cell count (12.4 vs 11.5), CRP (79.5 vs 57) and heart rate (94 vs 88) on admission. Justifications given for administration included swelling (74), dysphagia (21), and airway compromise (7). Three patients (0.8%) reported steroid-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study uses the largest recorded cohort of cervicofacial infections to define current inpatient steroid administration. Our results suggest that steroids are targeted towards the most compromised 1/3 of patients. The incidence of steroid-related side effects was low. Defining the characteristics of patients currently receiving steroids will aid in determining whether steroid administration is an effective adjunct in treating odontogenic cervicofacial infection.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Brenda L Minor; Veida Elliott; Michelle Fernandez; Lindsay O'Neal; Laura McLeod; Giovanni Delacqua; Francesco Delacqua; Jacqueline Kirby; Stephany N Duda Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 6.317