| Literature DB >> 33202893 |
Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez1, Sandra Valle-Estévez2, Peñas Albas Fraile-García3, Alfonso Martínez-Nova1, Beatriz Gómez-Martín1, Elena Escamilla-Martínez1.
Abstract
Working on the intrinsic musculature of the foot has been shown to be effective in controlling pronation. However, the potential coadjuvant effect that involving other muscle groups might have on foot posture remains unknown. The aim was, therefore, to assess whether a 9-week intrinsic and extrinsic foot and core muscle strength program influenced foot posture in pronated subjects. The participants were 36 healthy adults with pronated feet that were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group (n = 18) performed a strengthening exercise protocol for 9 weeks (two sessions of 40 min per week), while the control group (n = 18) did not do these exercises. After 9 weeks, the foot posture index (FPI) scores of the two groups were analyzed to detect possible changes. The FPI at the baseline was 8.0 ± 1.5. After the 9 weeks, the experimental group showed significantly reduced FPI from 8.1 ± 1.7 to 6.4 ± 2.1 (p = 0.001), while the control group had the same score as pre-intervention (FPI 8 ± 1.2, p = 1.0). The FPI scores showed no significant differences by sex. Strengthening of the intrinsic and extrinsic foot and core muscles contributed to improving foot posture in adults, reducing their FPI by 1.66 points.Entities:
Keywords: flat foot; foot core; foot posture; health; pronated foot; therapeutic exercise
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33202893 PMCID: PMC7697388 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Anthropometric data of the sample by gender.
| Gender |
| Mean | SD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | Men | 15 | 77.6 | 7.5 | <0.001 |
| Women | 21 | 58.7 | 9.8 | ||
| Height | Men | 15 | 175.1 | 6.3 | <0.001 |
| Women | 21 | 161.1 | 6.4 | ||
| BMI | Men | 15 | 25.3 | 1.9 | 0.002 |
| Women | 21 | 22.3 | 2.9 | ||
| Years | Men | 15 | 24.3 | 6.3 | 0.099 |
| Women | 21 | 21.3 | 1.6 |
t-test for independent samples.
Figure 1Picking up small glass stones using toes and depositing the stones elsewhere.
Figure 2Inversion and eversion resistive movement with an elastic band.
Figure 3Hip abduction.
Differences by gender in both groups.
| Men | Women |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPI Experimental |
| 8.3 ± 1.7 | 8 ±1.8 | 0.887 |
|
| 7 ± 2.3 | 6.1 ± 2.1 | 0.457 | |
| FPI |
| 7.7 ± 1.4 | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 0.430 |
| Control |
| 7.7 ± 1.4 | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 0.430 |
t-test for independent samples.
Changes in foot posture index (FPI) group after the 9 weeks of the physical activity.
| Neutral | Pronated | Highly Pronated | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPI Pre | 0 | 15 | 3 | 18 |
| FPI Post | 6 | 11 | 1 | 18 |
|
| 0.001 | |||
chi-square test.