| Literature DB >> 33202694 |
Justyna Zorga1, Alina Kunicka-Styczyńska2, Radosław Gruska3, Krzysztof Śmigielski1.
Abstract
The aim of the research was to increase the efficiency of the hydrodistillation process and determine the volatile composition, biological activity, and aroma profile of essential oil from celery seeds (Apium graveolens L.). The essential oil was extracted from the plant material by ultrasonic hydrodistillation with higher efficiency when compared with classical hydrodistillation. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using the impedimetric method for the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and yeast Candida vini as well as moulds Aspergillus niger and Penicillium expansum with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (μL/mL) values: 30, 10, 20, 3, 30, 40, and 40, respectively. The oil possessed very weak 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) antioxidant activity with the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 81.6 g/L. Initial studies of the aroma profile indicated that the perception of the fragrance of the oil could be related to the sex of the panellists. According to women, the fragrance of celery seeds oil was intense herb-like. From the men's point of view, it had a fresh, mossy, and mushroom scent.Entities:
Keywords: Taguchi method; aroma profile; biological activity; optimization; sonication
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33202694 PMCID: PMC7698019 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Statistical analysis of input factors for ultrasonic pre-treatment of celery seeds according to the Taguchi method.
| Test No. | Sonication Time (min) | Pulse Range | Power Control Amplitude (%) | Content of Water (mL) | Essential Oil Yield (g/100 g of Seeds) | Eta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 0.1 | 20 | 350 | 1.456 ± 0.011 | 3.318555 |
| 2 | 5 | 0.5 | 60 | 700 | 1.978 ± 0.048 | 5.922812 |
| 3 | 5 | 1 | 100 | 950 | 1.731 ± 0.035 | 4.763080 |
| 4 | 20 | 0.1 | 60 | 950 | 1.949 ± 0.029 | 5.797067 |
| 5 | 20 | 0.5 | 100 | 350 | 1.690 ± 0.011 | 4.557621 |
| 6 | 20 | 1 | 20 | 700 | 1.884 ± 0.015 | 5.501434 |
| 7 | 50 | 0.1 | 100 | 700 | 1.908 ± 0.061 | 5.607108 |
| 8 | 50 | 0.5 | 20 | 950 | 1.961 ± 0.045 | 5.846586 |
| 9 | 50 | 1 | 60 | 350 | 1.927 ± 0.043 | 5.697718 |
Figure 1The graphs of average Eta versus input levels of optimized parameters. Solid line—value of Eta, dashed line—±2∙standard error, 1,2,3—input levels for each parameters (content of water: 1–350 mL, 2–700 mL, 3–950 mL; power control amplitude 1–20%, 2–60%, 3–100%); pulse range: 1–0.1, 2–0.5, 3–1; sonication time: 1–5 min, 2–20 min, 3–50 min); n = 3.
Expected S/N ratio (Eta) under optimum conditions.
| Factor | Level | Effect Size | Standard Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contents of water [mL] | 2 | 0.453565 | 0.097524 |
| Power control amplitude [%] | 2 | 0.582312 | 0.097524 |
| Pulse range | 2 | 0.218786 | 0.097524 |
| Sonication time [min] | 3 | 0.493584 | 0.097524 |
| Expected S/N ratio | 6.971801 | ||
Composition of essential oil from ultrasounds pre-treated celery seeds (GC-MS).
| No. | Chemical Compound | RT (min) | RIE | RIL | Area (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOUAH | EOHD * | |||||
| 1 | 12.8 | 937 | 940 | 0.1 | 0 | |
| 2 | sabinene | 14.4 | 967 | 965 | tr | 0 |
| 3 | 15.0 | 980 | 972 | 0.8 | 0 | |
| 4 | 15.5 | 993 | 992 | 0.6 | 0.1 | |
| 5 | 16.3 | 1013 | 1011 | tr | 0 | |
| 6 | limonene | 16.8 | 1026 | 1027 | 76.9 | 1 |
| 7 | 19.2 | 1085 | 1082 | tr | 0.1 | |
| 8 | octen-1-ol acetate | 19.5 | 1100 | 1102 | tr | 0 |
| 9 | 19.9 | 1103 | 1103 | 0.1 | 0 | |
| 10 | limona ketone | 20.0 | 1106 | 1105 | tr | 0 |
| 11 | 20.4 | 1116 | 1116 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
| 12 | limonene oxide | 21.3 | 1138 | 1138 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 13 | pentylbenzene | 21.5 | 1144 | 1146 | 0.7 | −0.1 |
| 14 | 1-pentylcyclohexa-1,3-diene | 21.7 | 1148 | 1156 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 15 | 22.1 | 1167 | 1174 | tr | 0 | |
| 16 | 22.5 | 1169 | 1175 | tr | 0 | |
| 17 | 22.6 | 1171 | 1167 | 0.1 | 0 | |
| 18 | 22.9 | 1179 | 1179 | 0.1 | 0 | |
| 19 | dihydrocarveol | 23.0 | 1181 | 1181 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 20 | 23.9 | 1479 | 1472 | tr | 0 | |
| 21 | 34.0 | 1487 | 1491 | 9.7 | 0.4 | |
| 22 | 34.2 | 1494 | 1500 | 1.4 | 0.1 | |
| 23 | 7- | 35.4 | 1532 | 1526 | tr | 0 |
| 24 | selina-3,7(11)-diene | 35.5 | 1540 | 1535 | tr | 0 |
| 25 | hedycariol | 36.1 | 1545 | 1541 | tr | 0 |
| 26 | 36.7 | 1573 | 1576 | 0.5 | 0 | |
| 27 | humulene epoxide 2 | 37.5 | 1597 | 1601 | tr | 0 |
| 28 | 3-butylphthalide | 38.0 | 1626 | 1629 | 3.6 | 0.5 |
| 29 | 38.7 | 1639 | 1644 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |
| 30 | sedanenolide (senkyunolide A) | 39.9 | 1698 | 1701 | 3.4 ** | −1.1 |
| total | 99.0 | |||||
| monoterpenes | 78.4 | |||||
| monoterpenoids | 0.7 | |||||
| sesquiterpenes | 11.1 | |||||
| sesquiterpenoids | 1.0 | |||||
| other hydrocarbons | 7.8 | |||||
tr—trace, EOUAH—the essential oil obtained by ultrasound-assisted hydrodistillation, EOHD—the essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation, RT—retention time, RIE and RIL—experimental and literature (the NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69) retention index, *—the difference in the content expressed in percentage point in relation to Dąbrowska et al. (2020) [13], where 0 means no differences in chemical composition, **—a chemical compound that content has changed statistically significantly.
Figure 2GC-MS chromatogram of the essential oil from sonicated celery seeds (Apium graveolens L.). For peak identification, see Table 3.
Antimicrobial activity of essential oil from sonicated celery seeds.
| Strain | MIC (μL/mL) | MBC/MFC * (μL/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 70 | |
| 30 | 100 | |
| 20 | 150 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 40 | >300 * | |
| 40 | >300 * | |
| 30 | 120 * |
MIC—minimal inhibitory concentration, MBC—minimal bactericidal concentration, MFC—minimal fungicidal concentration. SD (the standard deviations) equalled 0, (n = 3).
Antioxidant activity of essential oil from sonicated celery seeds.
| Concentration of Essential Oil (g/L) | 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH radicals scavenging effect (%) | 34.5 ± 0.3 | 35.3 ± 0.3 | 37.9 ± 0.3 | 39.6 ± 0.3 | 44.8 ± 0.4 | 52.9 ± 0.4 |
| Trolox Equivalents (µg/mL) | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 10.2 ± 0.4 |
| IC50 parameter (g/L) | 81.6 | |||||
Figure 3Aroma profile of essential oil from sonicated celery seeds assessed by men (A) and by women (B) (n = 3).
The experimental layout according to the L9 orthogonal array.
| Test No. | Sonication Time (min) | Pulse Range | Power Control Amplitude (%) | Content of Water (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 0.1 | 20 | 350 |
| 2 | 5 | 0.5 | 60 | 700 |
| 3 | 5 | 1 | 100 | 950 |
| 4 | 20 | 0.1 | 60 | 950 |
| 5 | 20 | 0.5 | 100 | 350 |
| 6 | 20 | 1 | 20 | 700 |
| 7 | 50 | 0.1 | 100 | 700 |
| 8 | 50 | 0.5 | 20 | 950 |
| 9 | 50 | 1 | 60 | 350 |