| Literature DB >> 33202571 |
Manoj Tripathi1, Luca Valentini2, Yuanyang Rong1, Silvia Bittolo Bon2, Maria F Pantano3, Giorgio Speranza4,5,6, Roberto Guarino3, David Novel3,4, Erica Iacob4, Wei Liu4, Victor Micheli4, Alan B Dalton1, Nicola M Pugno3,7.
Abstract
Hybrid nanomaterials fabricated by the heterogeneous integration of 1D (carbon nanotubes) and 2D (graphene oxide) nanomaterials showed synergy in electrical and mechanical properties. Here, we reported the infiltration of carboxylic functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (C-SWNT) into free-standing graphene oxide (GO) paper for better electrical and mechanical properties than native GO. The stacking arrangement of GO sheets and its alteration in the presence of C-SWNT were comprehensively explored through scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction. The C-SWNTs bridges between different GO sheets produce a pathway for the flow of electrical charges and provide a tougher hybrid system. The nanoscopic surface potential map reveals a higher work function of the individual functionalised SWNTs than surrounded GO sheets showing efficient charge exchange. We observed the enhanced conductivity up to 50 times and capacitance up to 3.5 times of the hybrid structure than the GO-paper. The laminate of polystyrene composites provided higher elastic modulus and mechanical strength when hybrid paper is used, thus paving the way for the exploitation of hybrid filler formulation in designing polymer composites.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanotubes; composites; electrical properties; mechanical properties; nanotechnology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33202571 PMCID: PMC7696645 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a) Photograph (4 cm) and optical image resolution (5×) for free-standing GO and (b) of GO/C-SWNT paper. (c) SEM image (the background has been whitened, for clarity) of a GO-paper showing packing of each GO layer conglomeration. (d) AFM image of individual GO sheets cross-stacked to produce a GO-paper. (e) A water drop profile on a GO sheet with a contact angle of 76.47° over GO sheets. (f) SEM image of a GO/C-SWNT paper shows entangled CNTs network; inset reveals an area of the cross-section. (g) AFM image of GO/C-SWNT paper shows disruption of GO sheet arrangement in vertical stacking, some C-SWNT are shown by marked arrows. (h) The water contact angle measurement of the GO/C-SWNT paper is 62.98° showing higher hydrophilic characteristics than GO-paper. The “+” sign indicates the focused location of the objective lens at the topmost curvature of water droplet.
Figure 2(a,b) XRD spectra of GO and GO/C-SWNT paper for 2θ range between 5–30°. (c) Raman spectra of pure C-SWNT, GO-paper and GO/C-SWNT in the range from 1000 cm−1 to 3200 cm−1 showing characteristics D, G, and 2D peaks. Inset shows the zoomed region of 2D and D+G peaks for the native GO-paper. (d) TGA (thermogravimetric analysis) recorded from 20 °C to 800 °C with the degradation of GO and GO/C-SWNT in Ar- atmosphere, inset DTG curves shows the rate of mass loss at different temperatures. (e,f) Histogram from XPS data measured for C1S and O1S of GO and GO/C-SWNT of pre and post TGA treatment showing the presence of aliphatic and functional carbon groups.
Figure 3(a) I-V curve of GO-paper and GO/C-SWNT paper between −20 to 20 V. Inset shows resolved I-V curve from GO-paper. (b) Cyclic voltammetry for GO and GO/C-SWNT paper in buffer solution (PBS = 7).
Figure 4(a) 3D-AFM topography of C-SWNTs on GO surface, showing their distribution and networking with each other over GO sheets. (b) The local conductivity map contrast between C-SWNT and GO sheets under a bias voltage of 900mV. (c) I-V curve carried out at 3 different C-SWNTs marked as 1, 2 and 3 showing the impact of functional groups on local electrical property. (d) 3-D morphology carried under KPFM operation in first-pass scanning shows individual C-SWNTs of a diameter nearly 5nm connected to its network. (e) The CPD (mV) contrast (second pass) between individual C-SWNT illustrating the difference in the work function (WF) between GO sheets, individual C-SWNT and its network. (f) Schematic view of the AFM set-up of the same sample used for C-AFM and KPFM measurements. (g) WF profile of an individual C-SWNT marked by dotted circle which is higher than in the surrounded GO. (h) The trend of increasing WF values with accumulation of C-SWNTs. (i) Enlarged representation of the proposed bridging mechanism of GO sheets by C-SWNT and the edge interaction between GO sheets through water molecules [46,57].
Figure 5(a) SEM image of the AFM tip apex and the cross-section region of GO-paper. (b) A schematic view showing a uniaxial tensile force applied to a GO-paper. (c) Force-penetration plots recorded for a GO-paper, GO/C-SWNT and Graphite (HOPG, reference sample) using a DLC-coated silicon tip (inset SEM image probe apex). The data dispersion is associated with the degree of uniformity in the packing of individual layers as well as the roughness of the topmost layers. (d) The indentation depth measured after force-distance spectroscopy shows higher depth (nm) in hybrid GO/C-SWNT. (e) Stress-strain curves obtained from tensile tests on GO-paper and GO/C-SWNT. (f) Stress-strain curve for PS laminates obtained from GO and GO/C-SWNT fillers.
Nanoindentation and tensile tests of GO, GO/C-SWNT and PS composites.
| Sample in Nanoindentation Tests | Equation (2) Fit | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Average R2 | |||
| GO | 1.47 ± 0.70 | 0.56 ± 0.73 | 0.99 |
| GO/C-SWNT | 0.23 ± 0.12 | negligible | 0.91 |
| HOPG | 11.41 ± 1.89 | 0.21 ± 0.50 | 0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| GO | 652 ± 127 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 9 ± 1 |
| GO/C-SWNT | 738 ± 76 | 7.7 ± 1.2 | 50 ± 20 |
| PS (neat) | 153 ± 42 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 150 ± 50 |
| PS-GO | 178 ± 9 | 2 ± 0.3 | 12 ± 1 |
| PS-GO/C-SWNT | 294 ± 77 | 5.5 ± 2 | 100 ± 30 |