Literature DB >> 33201604

Estimates of on-farm antimicrobial usage in turkey production in the United States, 2013-2017.

Randall S Singer1,2, Leah J Porter2, Nora F D Schrag3, Peter R Davies4,5, Michael D Apley3, Kathe Bjork6.   

Abstract

With increasing concern about the emergence and spread of resistant bacteria, there is an increasing motivation to optimize antimicrobial use administrations in animal agriculture. A key component of antimicrobial stewardship is the ability to collect antimicrobial use data and ultimately use this information to assess that administrations are necessary and effective. The objective of this study was to develop a system for collecting on-farm antimicrobial use data from the US turkey industry and to have it be representative of the largest commercial turkey producers in the United States that comprise the vast majority of national turkey production. Participation was voluntary. Data were collected for the period 2013 through 2017 and are reported on a calendar year basis. Using statistics from USDA:NASS as a denominator, the data supplied by participating companies represented approximately 67.3% of turkey production in the United States in 2013 and increased to approximately 69.8% in 2017. The data that were submitted for 2017 are based on approximately 187,016,604 poults placed, 164,081,335 turkeys slaughtered, and 5,178,431,422 pounds liveweight produced. The estimated percentage of turkey poults placed that received hatchery antimicrobials decreased from 96% in 2013 to 41% in 2017. Medically important in-feed antimicrobial use decreased substantially. For example, in-feed tetracycline use decreased approximately 67% between 2013 and 2017. Medically important water-soluble antimicrobial use decreased substantially for most antimicrobials. Between 2013 and 2017, water-soluble penicillin use decreased approximately 42%, water-soluble tetracycline use decreased approximately 28%, and water-soluble lincomycin use decreased approximately 46%. Reducing the total amounts of antimicrobials used might be a crude indicator for mitigating the selection of antimicrobial resistance. Reducing the need for such use and verifying that treatment regimens deliver beneficial outcomes to animal health are more meaningful objectives.
© 2020 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial stewardship; antimicrobial use; epidemiological monitoring; turkeys

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201604     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  4 in total

1.  Characterizing avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) from colibacillosis cases, 2018.

Authors:  Darby M Newman; Nicolle L Barbieri; Aline L de Oliveira; Dajour Willis; Lisa K Nolan; Catherine M Logue
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  From OIE standards to responsible and prudent use of antimicrobials: supporting stewardship for the use of antimicrobial agents in animals.

Authors:  Jorge Pinto Ferreira; Delfy Gochez; Morgan Jeannin; Mduduzi Welcome Magongo; Camille Loi; Karen Bucher; Gerard Moulin; Elisabeth Erlacher-Vindel
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Non-typhoidal Salmonella From Retail Meat Products in California, 2018.

Authors:  Katie Yen Lee; Edward Robert Atwill; Maurice Pitesky; Anny Huang; Kurtis Lavelle; Maribel Rickard; Marzieh Shafii; Melody Hung-Fan; Xunde Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 4.  Comparison of different biomass methodologies to adjust sales data on veterinary antimicrobials in the USA.

Authors:  Ece Bulut; Renata Ivanek
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.790

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.