Literature DB >> 33201104

Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning.

Pietro Mascagni1,2, Armine Vardazaryan1, Deepak Alapatt1, Takeshi Urade3, Taha Emre1, Claudio Fiorillo2, Patrick Pessaux3,4,5, Didier Mutter4,5, Jacques Marescaux4, Guido Costamagna2, Bernard Dallemagne4,5, Nicolas Padoy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a deep learning model to automatically segment hepatocystic anatomy and assess the criteria defining the critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
BACKGROUND: Poor implementation and subjective interpretation of CVS contributes to the stable rates of bile duct injuries in LC. As CVS is assessed visually, this task can be automated by using computer vision, an area of artificial intelligence aimed at interpreting images.
METHODS: Still images from LC videos were annotated with CVS criteria and hepatocystic anatomy segmentation. A deep neural network comprising a segmentation model to highlight hepatocystic anatomy and a classification model to predict CVS criteria achievement was trained and tested using 5-fold cross validation. Intersection over union, average precision, and balanced accuracy were computed to evaluate the model performance versus the annotated ground truth.
RESULTS: A total of 2854 images from 201 LC videos were annotated and 402 images were further segmented. Mean intersection over union for segmentation was 66.6%. The model assessed the achievement of CVS criteria with a mean average precision and balanced accuracy of 71.9% and 71.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning algorithms can be trained to reliably segment hepatocystic anatomy and assess CVS criteria in still laparoscopic images. Surgical-technical partnerships should be encouraged to develop and evaluate deep learning models to improve surgical safety.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201104     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  21 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Tadahiro Goto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tomer Golany; Amit Aides; Daniel Freedman; Nadav Rabani; Yun Liu; Ehud Rivlin; Greg S Corrado; Yossi Matias; Wisam Khoury; Hanoch Kashtan; Petachia Reissman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Validation of an artificial intelligence platform for the guidance of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Simon Laplante; Babak Namazi; Parmiss Kiani; Daniel A Hashimoto; Adnan Alseidi; Mauricio Pasten; L Michael Brunt; Sujata Gill; Brian Davis; Matthew Bloom; Luise Pernar; Allan Okrainec; Amin Madani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 4.  Computer-aided anatomy recognition in intrathoracic and -abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  R B den Boer; C de Jongh; W T E Huijbers; T J M Jaspers; J P W Pluim; R van Hillegersberg; M Van Eijnatten; J P Ruurda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Surgery utilizing artificial intelligence technology: why we should not rule it out.

Authors:  Hisashi Shinohara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.540

Review 6.  The Advances in Computer Vision That Are Enabling More Autonomous Actions in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Vincent Grasso; Nicolas Bourdel; Roland Croner; Gaya Spolverato; Isabella Frigerio; Alfredo Illanes; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Adrian Park; Eyad Elyan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01).

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakanuma; Yuichi Endo; Atsuro Fujinaga; Masahiro Kawamura; Takahide Kawasaki; Takashi Masuda; Teijiro Hirashita; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Ken'ichi Shinozuka; Yusuke Matsunobu; Toshiya Kamiyama; Makoto Ishikake; Kohei Ebe; Tatsushi Tokuyasu; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 8.  Objective assessment of robotic surgical skills: review of literature and future directions.

Authors:  Saratu Kutana; Daniel P Bitner; Poppy Addison; Paul J Chung; Mark A Talamini; Filippo Filicori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Explaining a model predicting quality of surgical practice: a first presentation to and review by clinical experts.

Authors:  Arthur Derathé; Fabian Reche; Pierre Jannin; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Bernard Gibaud; Sandrine Voros
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 10.  Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.

Authors:  Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 13.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.