Karolina Obońska1, Michał Kasprzak2, Kamila Tymosiak2, Tomasz Fabiszak2, Magdalena Krintus3, Jacek Kubica2. 1. Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland. k.obonska@cm.umk.pl. 2. Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, 9 Sklodowskiej-Curie Street, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In an attempt to improve low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level control in patients ineffectively treated with statins, we evaluated the effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg rosuvastatin and ezetimibe and its relation to the timing of drug administration. METHODS: A randomized, open label, single center, crossover study involving 83 patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia with baseline LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. In arm I the FDC drug was administered in the morning for 6 weeks, then in the evening for the following 6 weeks and vice versa in arm II. The primary endpoint was the change in LDL-C after 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: The median LDL-C concentration at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks respectively was: 98.10 mg/dL (Q1;Q3: 85.10;116.80), 63.14 mg/dL (50.70;77.10) and 59.40 mg/dL (49.00;73.30); p < 0.001. LDL-C levels were similar regardless of the timing of drug administration (morning 62.50 mg/dL [50.70;76.00] vs. evening 59.70 mg/dL [48.20;73.80]; p = 0.259], in both time points: 6 week: 63.15 mg/dL (50.75;80.65) vs. 63.40 mg/dL (50.60;74.00), p = 0.775; and 12 week: 62.00 mg/dL (50.20;74.40) vs. 59.05 mg/dL (47.65;66.05), p = 0.362. The absolute change in LDL-C concentration for the morning vs. evening drug administration was - 6 week: -34.6 mg/dL (-56.55; -19.85) (-34.87%) vs. -31.10 mg/dL (-44.20; -16.00) (-35.87%) (p not significant); 12. week: -34.20 mg/dL (-47.8; -19.0) (-37.12%) vs. -37.20 mg/dL (-65.55; -23.85) (-40.06%) (p not significant). The therapy was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe significantly and permanently decreases LDL-C regardless of the timing of drug administration.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In an attempt to improve low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level control in patients ineffectively treated with statins, we evaluated the effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg rosuvastatin and ezetimibe and its relation to the timing of drug administration. METHODS: A randomized, open label, single center, crossover study involving 83 patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia with baseline LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. In arm I the FDC drug was administered in the morning for 6 weeks, then in the evening for the following 6 weeks and vice versa in arm II. The primary endpoint was the change in LDL-C after 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: The median LDL-C concentration at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks respectively was: 98.10 mg/dL (Q1;Q3: 85.10;116.80), 63.14 mg/dL (50.70;77.10) and 59.40 mg/dL (49.00;73.30); p < 0.001. LDL-C levels were similar regardless of the timing of drug administration (morning 62.50 mg/dL [50.70;76.00] vs. evening 59.70 mg/dL [48.20;73.80]; p = 0.259], in both time points: 6 week: 63.15 mg/dL (50.75;80.65) vs. 63.40 mg/dL (50.60;74.00), p = 0.775; and 12 week: 62.00 mg/dL (50.20;74.40) vs. 59.05 mg/dL (47.65;66.05), p = 0.362. The absolute change in LDL-C concentration for the morning vs. evening drug administration was - 6 week: -34.6 mg/dL (-56.55; -19.85) (-34.87%) vs. -31.10 mg/dL (-44.20; -16.00) (-35.87%) (p not significant); 12. week: -34.20 mg/dL (-47.8; -19.0) (-37.12%) vs. -37.20 mg/dL (-65.55; -23.85) (-40.06%) (p not significant). The therapy was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe significantly and permanently decreases LDL-C regardless of the timing of drug administration.
Authors: R John Simes; Ian C Marschner; David Hunt; David Colquhoun; David Sullivan; Ralph A H Stewart; Wendy Hague; Anthony Keech; Peter Thompson; Harvey White; John Shaw; Andrew Tonkin Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T S Parker; D J McNamara; C Brown; O Garrigan; R Kolb; H Batwin; E H Ahrens Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1982-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Herbert Schuster; Philip J Barter; Steen Stender; Raphael C Cheung; Jacques Bonnet; Jonathan M Morrell; Claire Watkins; David Kallend; Ali Raza Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Peter H Jones; Michael H Davidson; Evan A Stein; Harold E Bays; James M McKenney; Elinor Miller; Valerie A Cain; James W Blasetto Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Erin A Bohula; Robert P Giugliano; Christopher P Cannon; Jing Zhou; Sabina A Murphy; Jennifer A White; Andrew M Tershakovec; Michael A Blazing; Eugene Braunwald Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: François Mach; Colin Baigent; Alberico L Catapano; Konstantinos C Koskinas; Manuela Casula; Lina Badimon; M John Chapman; Guy G De Backer; Victoria Delgado; Brian A Ference; Ian M Graham; Alison Halliday; Ulf Landmesser; Borislava Mihaylova; Terje R Pedersen; Gabriele Riccardi; Dimitrios J Richter; Marc S Sabatine; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Lale Tokgozoglu; Olov Wiklund Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Osman Ahmed; Karin Littmann; Ulf Gustafsson; Camilla Pramfalk; Katariina Öörni; Lilian Larsson; Mirko E Minniti; Staffan Sahlin; German Camejo; Paolo Parini; Mats Eriksson Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 5.501